Article information
Full text is only aviable in PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
American Thoracic Society.
Lung function testing: selection of reference values and interpretative strategies.
Am Rev Respir Dis, 144 (1991), pp. 1.202-1.218
[2.]
P. Harber.
Value based interpretation of pulmonary function tests.
Chest, 88 (1985), pp. 874-877
[3.]
M.A. Grippi, L.F. Metzger, A.V. Krupinski, A.P. Fishman.
Pulmonary function testing.
Pulmonary diseases and disorders, pp. 2. 469-2.521
[4.]
American College of Chest Physicians.
Statement on spirometry. A report of the section on respiratory pathophysiology, 83 (1983), pp. 547-550
[5.]
M.R. Miller, A.C. Pincock.
Predicted values: how should we use them?.
Thorax, 43 (1988), pp. 265-267
[6.]
J. Cary, J. Huseby, B. Culver, C. Kosanke.
Variability in interpretation of pulmonary function tests.
Chest, 76 (1979), pp. 389-390
[7.]
J. Roca.
Aplicaciones clínicas de las pruebas de función pulmonar.
Enfermedades respiratorias. Utilidad del laboratorio, pp. 171-190
[8.]
American Heart Association.
AHA Council Report. Manual for evaluation of lung function by spirometry, 65 (1982), pp. 644A-651A
[9.]
Ph.H. Quanjer, G.J. Tammeling, J.E. Cotes, O.F. Pedersen, R. Peslin, J.-C. Yernault.
Standardized lung function testing.
Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows. Official statement of the European Respiratory Society. Eur Respir J, 6 (1993), pp. 5-40
[10.]
SEPAR.
Normativa para la espirometría forzada.
Ediciones Doyma S.A, (1985),
[11.]
American Thoracic Society.
Standardization of spirometry -1994 update.
J Respir Crit Care Med, 152 (1995), pp. 1.107-1.136
[12.]
H.W. Gindmeyer, R.N. Jones, H.W. Barkman, H. Weill.
Spirometry: quantitative test criteria and test acceptability.
Am Rev Respir Dis, 136 (1987), pp. 449-452
[13.]
P.L. Enright, L.R. Johnson, J.E. Connetl, H. Voelken, A.S. Buist.
Spirometry in the Lung Health Study.
1. Methods and quality control. Am Rev Respir Dis, 143 (1991), pp. 1.215-1.223
[14.]
M.R. Becklake.
Concepts of normality applied to the measurement of lung function.
Am J Med, 80 (1986), pp. 1.158-1.164
[15.]
J.E. Cotes.
Lung function throughout life: determinants reference values.
Lung function. Assessment and application in medicine, pp. 445-513
[16.]
J.G. Garcia, G.W. Hunninghake, K.M. Nugent.
Thoracic gas volume measurement.
Increased variability in patients with obstructive ventilatory defects. Chest, 85 (1984), pp. 272-275
[17.]
S. Humerfelt, G.E. Eide, G. Kvále, A. Gulsvik.
Predictors of spirometric tests failure: a comparison of the 1983 and 1993 acceptability criteria from the European Community for Coal and Steel.
Eur Respir J, 7 (1994), pp. 355S
[18.]
L.W. Ng’ang’a, P. Ernst, M.S. Jaakkola, G. Gerardi, J.H. Hanley, M.K. Becklake.
Spirometric lung function. Distribution and determinants of test failure in a young adult population.
Am Rev Respir Dis, 145 (1992), pp. 48-52
[19.]
A.E. Medinger.
Should largest FEV, be reported from spirometric trials?.
Am Rev Respir Dis, 141 (1990), pp. A223
[20.]
R.T. McKay.
Pulmonary function testings: minimum standards versus desirable features.
Am Rev Respir Dis, 139 (1989), pp. A553
[21.]
D.R. Jacobs Jr., E.T. Nelson, A.S. Dontas, J. Kellen, M.L. Slattery, M. Higgins.
Are race and sex differences in lung function explained by frame size?. The CARDIA Study.
Am Rev Respir Dis, 146 (1992), pp. 644-649
[22.]
B.E. Pennock, J.J. Cottrell, R.M. Rogers.
Pulmonary function testing.
What is “normal”?. Arch Intern Med, 143 (1983), pp. 2.123-2.127
[23.]
B.E. Pennock, R.M. Rogers, D.R. McCaffree.
Changes in measured spirometric indices.
What is significant?. Chest, 80 (1981), pp. 97-99
[24.]
M.R. Miller, A.C. Pincock.
Repeatability of the moments of the truncated forced expiratory spirogram.
Thorax, 37 (1982), pp. 205-211
[25.]
M.C. Kapp, E.N. Schachter, G.J. Beck, L.R. Maunder, T.J. Witek Jr..
The shape of the maximum expiratory flow volume curve.
Chest, 94 (1988), pp. 799-806
[26.]
P. Enright.
Reporting the reproducibility of spirometry results.
Am Rev Respir Dis, 146 (1992), pp. 1.367-1.368
[27.]
J.H. Ellis Jr., S.P. Perera, D.C. Levin.
A computer program for calculation and interpretation of pulmonary function studies.
Chest, 68 (1975), pp. 209-213
[28.]
P. Harber, R. Schnur, J. Emery, S. Brooks, Y. Ploy-Song-Sang.
Statistical “biases” in respiratory disability determinations.
Am Rev Respir Dis, 128 (1983), pp. 413-418
[29.]
B.J. Sobol.
The early detection of airway obstruction: another perspective.
Am J Med, 60 (1976), pp. 619-624
[30.]
Herranz Díez.
Concordancia entre los valores de referencia para la espirometría recomendados por las Sociedades Neumológicas Españolas y Europea.
Arch Bronconeumol, 32 (1996), pp. 459-462
[31.]
A. Díez Herranz, J. Para Cabello, A. Aller, J.L. acutelvarez.
Interpretando la espirometría: ¿porcentajes o percentiles? Validación de diferentes criterios diagnósticos. XII Premio CIBA.
XIV Congreso SOCALPAR, (1993),
[32.]
E. Ferrante, M. Anaclerio, M. Quatela, R. Pistelli, G.M. Corbo, L. Fuso, et al.
Reference spirometric data and their modelling: is it time to change the traditional variables in models?.
Eur Respir J, 7 (1994), pp. 354S
[33.]
G. Viegi, B. Lundbäck, F. Di Pede, M. Vellutini, F. Pistelli, E. Jonsson, et al.
Comparison of forced expirograms in asymptomatic subjects of Italian and Swedish epidemiological samples.
Eur Respir J, 8 (1993), pp. 34S
[34.]
P.J. Cordero, P. Morales, E. Benlloch, L. Miravet, J. Cebrián.
Spirometric studies in normal subjects.
Reference values for adults of Spanish descent. Eur Respir J, 8 (1995), pp. 436S
[35.]
A.J. Ghio, R.O. Crapo, C.G. Elliot.
Reference equations used to predict pulmonary function.
Survey at institutions with respiratory disease training programs in the United States and Canada. Chest, 97 (1990), pp. 400-403
[36.]
H.M. Thomas III., R.C. Garret.
Interpretation of spirometry. A graphic and computational approach.
Chest, 86 (1984), pp. 129-131
[37.]
B.J. Sobol, P.G. Sobol.
Per cent of predicted as the limit of normal in.pulmonary function testing: a statistically valid approach.
Thorax, 34: (1979), pp. 1-3
[38.]
M.R. Miller, A.C. Pincock.
Predicted values: how should we use them?.
Thorax, 43 (1988), pp. 663-664
[39.]
PhH. Quanjer.
RV/TLC% ratio: alternative criteria of normality.
Eur Respir J, 8 (1995), pp. 1.813
[40.]
C.M. Roberts, K.D. Mac Rae, A.J. Winning, L. Adams, W.A. Seed.
Reference values and prediction equations for normal lung function in a nonsmoking white urban population.
Thorax, 46 (1991), pp. 643-650
[41.]
K.P. Poirier.
A quantitative definition of obstructive lung disease.
Am J Med, 45 (1968), pp. 329-335
[42.]
N. Gavriely, M. Nissan, D.W. Cugell, A-H.E. Rubin.
Respiratory health screening using pulmonary function tests and lung sound analysis.
Eur Respir J, 7 (1994), pp. 35-42
[43.]
K.C. Beck, K.P. Offord, P.D. Scanlon.
Comparison of four methods for calculating diffusing capacity by the single breath method.
Chest, 105 (1994), pp. 594-600
[44.]
N.M. Siafakas, P. Vermeire, N.B. Pride, P. Paoletti, J. Gibson, P. Howard, on behalf of the Task Force. Optimal assessment and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), et al.
A consensus statement of the European Respiratory Society (ERS).
Eur Respir J, 8 (1995), pp. 1.398-1.420
[45.]
L.C. Oliver, E.A. Eisen, N.L. Sprincc.
A comparison of two definitions of abnormality on pulmonary outcome in epidemiologic studies.
Am Rev Respir Dis, 133 (1986), pp. 825-829
[46.]
M. Terrin.
Reference spirometric values using techniques and equipment that meet ATS recommendations.
Am Rev Respir Dis, 124 (1981), pp. 763-764
[47.]
M.R. Miller, A.C. Pincock.
Retention of unwanted bias using percent of predicted.
Am Rev Respir Dis, 135 (1987), pp. 119A
[48.]
R.O. Crapo, A.H. Morris, R.M. Gardner.
Reference spirometric values using techniques and equipment that meet ATS recommendations.
Am Rev Respir Dis, 123 (1981), pp. 659-664
[49.]
D.E. Matthews, V.T. Farewell.
Estadística médica. Aplicación e interpretación.
Salvat Editores, S.A, (1990), pp. 93-107
[50.]
M.R. Miller, A.C. Pincock.
Grove DM. Patterns of spirogram abnormality in individual smokers. Am Rev Respir Dis, 132 (1985), pp. 1.034-1.040
[51.]
R.O. Crapo, A.H. Morris, R.M. Gardner.
Reference spirometric values using techniques and equipment that meet ATS recommendations.
Am Rev Respir Dis, 124 (1981), pp. 764
[52.]
R. Detels, D.P. Tashkin, M.S. Simmons, H.E. Carmichael Jr., J.W. Sayre, S.N. Rokaw, et al.
The UCLA population studies of chronic obstructive respiratory disease.
5. Agreement and disagreement of tests in identifying abnormal lung function. Chest, 82 (1982), pp. 630-638
[53.]
B.E. Pennock, R.M. Rogers, G.R. Owens, K.M. Unger.
The normal ranges in spirometric indices.
Chest, 81 (1982), pp. 658-659
[54.]
P.D. Oldham.
Per cent of predicted as the limit of normal in pulmonary function testing: a statistically valid approach.
Thorax, 34 (1979), pp. 569
[56.]
M.R. Miller, D.M. Grove, A.C. Pincock.
Time domain spirogram indices.
Their variability and reference values in nonsmokers. Am Rev Respir Dis, 132 (1985), pp. 1.041-1.048
[57.]
A. Díez Herranz, J. Para Cabello, M.L. Fernández Rodríguez.
Validación de diversos criterios de interpretación de la espirometría forzada.
Estudio preliminar. Arch Bronconeumol, 30 (1994), pp. 418-419
[58.]
A. Díez Herranz, F.E. Teruel González, J.L. Aller Alvarez.
Concordancia entre diferentes criterios de normalidad de los volúmenes pulmonares.
Arch Bronconeumol, 31 (1995), pp. 43
[59.]
A. Díez Herranz.
RV/TLC% ratio: alternative criteria of normality.
Eur Respir J, 8 (1995), pp. 1.812-1.813
[60.]
J. Vestbo, K.M. Knudson, F.V. Rasmussen.
The effect of smoking and occupation on lung function -a question of spirometry index and statistical methods?.
Am Rev Respir Dis, 139 (1989), pp. A545
[61.]
O. Eliasson, A.C. Degraff Jr..
The use of criteria for reversibility and obstruction to define patient groups for bronchodilator trials.
Influence of clinical diagnosis, spirometric, and anthropometric variables. Am Rev Respir Dis, 132 (1985), pp. 858-864
[62.]
K.J. Killian, P. Leblanc, D.H. Martin, E. Summers, N.L. Jones, E.J.M. Campbell.
Exercise capacity and ventilatory, circulatory, and symptom limitation in patients with chronic airflow limitation.
Am Rev Respir Dis, 146 (1992), pp. 935-940
[63.]
T.M. Brugman, J.F. Morris, W.P. Temple.
Comparison of lung volume measurements by single breath helium and multiple breath nitrogen equilibration methods in normal subjects and COPD patients.
Respiration, 49 (1986), pp. 52-60
[64.]
J.E. Cotes.
Lung function in disease.
Lung function. Assessment and application in medicine, pp. 514-609
[65.]
R. Gilbert, J.H. Auchincloss.
What is a “restrictive” defect?.
Arch Intern Med, 146 (1986), pp. 1.779-1.781
[66.]
J.J. Cottrell, B.E. Pennock, R.M. Rogers.
A simplified computer report.
Towards an understandable pulmonary function test. Chest, 84 (1983), pp. 158-160
[67.]
R. Gilbert, J.H. Auchincloss.
The interpretation of the spirogram.
How accurate is it for “obstruction”?. Arch Intern Med, 145 (1985), pp. 1.635-1.639
[68.]
American Thoracic Society.
Evaluation of impairment/disability secondary to respiratory disorders.
Am Rev Respir Dis, 133 (1986), pp. 1.205-1.209
[69.]
L.C. Oliver, E.A. Eisen, N.L. Sprince.
Effects of definition criteria on outcome in epidemiologic studies.
Am Rev Respir Dis, 131 (1985), pp. A175
[70.]
R. Gilbert, J.H. Auchincloss, D. Beloltti, D. Peppi.
Spirometric diagnosis of airway obstruction.
Am Rev Respir Dis, 127 (1983), pp. 119A
[71.]
A.F. Gelb, A.J. Williams, N. Zamel.
Spirometry. FEV1 vs FEF25-75 percent.
Chest, 84 (1983), pp. 473-474
[72.]
J.E. Cotes.
Assessment of bellows and mechanical attributes of the lung.
Lung function. Assessment and application in medicine, pp. 131-178
[73.]
A.L. Coates, K.J. Desmond, D. Demizio, P. Allen, P.H. Beaudry.
Sources of error in flow-volume curves.
Effect of expired volume measured at the mouth vs that measured in a body plethysmoaraph. Chest, 94 (1988), pp. 976-982
[74.]
N. Pavlov, J. Tocilj.
Sensitivity and specificity of spirometry and maximal expiratory flow-volume curve in asthmatic and healthy children.
Eur Respir J, 8 (1995), pp. 130S
Copyright © 1996. Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica
