Journal Information
Vol. 42. Issue 11.
Pages 575-582 (November 2006)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 42. Issue 11.
Pages 575-582 (November 2006)
Original Articles
Full text access
Validation Study of the Spanish Adaptation of the Satisfaction With Asthma Treatment Questionnaire for Inhaled Medication
Visits
3958
Jesús Martín Fernándeza,
Corresponding author
jmartinefe@hotmail.com

Correspondence: Dr. J. Martín Fernández. CS San Martín de Valdeiglesias. La Bola, s/n. 28680 San Martín de Valdeiglesias. Madrid. España
, Carlos Barcina Sánchezb, Francisco Javier Jiménez Jiménezb, Rosario Marazuela Bermejob
a Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Centro de Salud San Martín de Valdeiglesias, Área 8 de AP, Servicio Madrileño de la Slaud, Madrid, Spain
b Departmento Médico, AstraZéneca Spain, Madrid, Spain
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Objective

Although satisfaction with asthma treatment is an important variable, it has received little attention and few validated measurement instruments are available. the aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties and the feasibility of the Spanish adpatation of the Satisfaction With Asthma Treatment Questionnaire (SATQ) for inhaled medication.

Patients and methods

This cross-sectional study to validate the adapted SATQ included 239 patients (67.8% women) with stable asthma (mean age, 43.3 yeas; forced expiratory volume in 1 second, 89% of predicted) and a median time since diagnosis of 10 years. Intermittent asthma was reported in 23.0% of the patients and severe persistent disease in 15.9%. Patients filled out the questionnaire twice.

Results

A 4-dimensional factorial structure could be discerned. These dimensions were similar to the validation of the original questionnaire and explained 55.1% of the variance. Internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach α, 0.880 for the overall score and 0.600-.866 for subscales), as was reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.912 for the overall score and 0.841-0.916 for subscales). A significant moderate correlation was observed between the overall score and physician—and patient—reported satisfaction (ρ=0.295 and 0.507, respectively). Three of the 4 subscales were able to discriminate between categories of the Global Initiative for Asthma. the questionnaire was completed in less than 10 minutes by 92.5% of the patients, and 93.7% left no filed blank.

Conclusions

The Spanish adaptation of the SATQ is a useful, user-friendly instrument for measuring satisfaction with indhaled treatment.

Key words:
Asthma
Patient Satisfaction
Questionnaire
Validation study
Objetivo

La satisfacción con el tratamiento en el asma es un aspecto trasendente, pero escasamente estudiado y con pocos instrumentos de mediad validados. Se pretende evalular las propiedades psicométricas y la factibilidad de la versión adaptada al castellano del cuestionario Satisfaction with inhaled Asthma Treatment Questionnaire (SATQ).

Pacientes y métodos

Se ha diseñado un estudio transversal analitico para la validacion de un cuestionario. Se incluyó a 239 pacientes con asma estable (edad media: 43,3 años; un 67,8% mujeres; volumen espiratorio forzado en el primer segundo, un 89% del teórico), con una mediana de tiempo de diagnóstico de 10 años. El 23,0% presentaba asma intermitente y el 15,9%, persistente grave. Cumplimentaron el cuestionario en 2 ocasiones.

Resultados

Se encontró una estructura factorial con 4 dimensiones, similares a la validacion original que explicaban el 55,1% de la variancia. La consistencia interna fue adecuada (alfa de Cronbach de 0,880 para la puntuación total y de 0,600-0,866 para las subescalas), así como la fiabilidad (coeficiente de correlación intraclase de 0,912 para la puntuación total y de 0,841-0,916 para las subescalas). Se observó una correlación significativa, de intensidad moderada, entre la puntuación total y la satisfacción referida por médico y paciente (rho = 0,295 y 0,507, respectivamente). Tres de las 4 subescalas fueron capaces de discriminar entre las categorias de la Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA). El 92,5% de los pacientes completaron el cuestionario en menos de 10 min y el 93,7% no dejaron ninguna pregunta en blanco.

Conclusiones

La versión adaptada del SATQ es una herramiento útil y fácil de usar para medir la satisfacción con el tratamineto inhalado.

Palabras clave:
Asma
Satisfacción del paciente
Cuestionario
Estudios de validación
Full text is only aviable in PDF
REFERENCES
[1]
JB Soriano, JM Antó.
Epidemiología del asma en España.
Avances en asma, pp. 1-5
[2]
GINA Workshop Report (Updated 2004). Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention. National Institutes of Health. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. NIH Publication no. 02-3659.
[3]
British Thoracic Society, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. British guideline on the management of asthma.
Thorax, 58 (2003), pp. 1-94
[4]
MR Partridge, SR Hill.
Enhancing care for people with asthma: the role of communication, education, training and self-management. 1998 World Asthma Meeting Education and Delivery of Care Working Group.
Eur Respir J., 16 (2000), pp. 333-348
[5]
L Osman.
the patient perspective. What should a new anti-asthma agent provide?.
Drugs, 52 (1996), pp. 29-35
[6]
A Lopez Viña.
Actitudes para fomentar el cumplimiento terapéutico en el asma.
Arch Bronconenumol., 41 (2005), pp. 334-340
[7]
ME Hyland, E Stähl.
Asthma treatment needs: a comparison of patients' and health care professionals' perceptions.
Clin Ther., 26 (2004), pp. 2141-2152
[8]
K Osterman, E Stahl, A Kallen.
Bricanyl Turbuhaler in the treatment of asthma: a six week multi-centre study carried out in Sweden, the United Kingdom, Denamark, Norway and Finland.
Eur Respir J., 4 (1991), pp. 175-179
[9]
P Mahajan, L Okamoto.
Patient satisfaction with the Diskhaler and the Diskus inhaler, a new multidose power delivery system for the treatment of asthma.
Clin Ther., 19 (1997), pp. 1126-1134
[10]
EM Cotterell, M Gazarian, RL Henry, MW O'Meara, SR Wales.
Child and parent satisfaction with the use of spacer devices in acute asthma.
J Paediatr Child Helath, 38 (2002), pp. 604-607
[11]
NM Clark, M Gong, MA Schork, N Kaciroti, D Evans, D Roloff, et al.
Long-term effects of asthma education for physicians on patient satisfaction and use of health services.
Eur Respir J., 16 (2000), pp. 15-21
[12]
M Perpiná, V Sobradillo, J Castillo, F Duce, F Manresa, J Martinez, et al.
Consistencia interna y validez de contenido de la versión española del Asthma Autonomy Questionnaire.
Arch Bronconeumol., 36 (2000), pp. 90-94
[13]
RJ Adams, BJ Smith, RE Ruffin.
Impact of the physician's participatory style in asthma outcomes and patient satisfaction.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol., 86 (2001), pp. 263-271
[14]
C Paterson, N Britten.
Organising primary health care for people with asthma: the patient's perspective.
Br J Gen Pract., 50 (2000), pp. 299-303
[15]
TA Balasbaugh, CV Chambers, JJ Diamond.
Asthma controller medications: what do patients want?.
J Asthma., 36 (1999), pp. 591-596
[16]
M Schlaeppi, K Edwards, RW Fuller, R Sharma.
Patient perception of the diskus inhaler: a comparison with the turbuhaler inhaler.
Br J Clin Pract., 50 (1996), pp. 14-19
[17]
SD Mathias, EH Warren, HH Colwell, JC Sung.
A new treatment satisfaction measure for asthmatics: a validation study.
Qual Life Res., 9 (2000), pp. 873-882
[18]
JL Campbell, GM Kiebert, MR Partridge.
Development of the Satisfaction with Asthma Treatment Questionnaire.
Eur Resp J., 22 (2003), pp. 127-134
[19]
CM Kozma, TL Slaton, BU Monz, R Hodder, PR Reese.
Development and validation of a patient satisfaction and preference questionnaire for inhalation devices.
Treat Respir Med., 4 (2005), pp. 41-52
[20]
C Acquadro, R Berzon, D Dubois, NK Leidy, P Marquis, D Revicki, et al.
PRO Harmonization Group. Incorporating the patient's perspective into drug development and communication: an ad hoc task force report of the Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Harmonization Group meeting at the Food and Drug Administration, February 16, 2001.
Value Health, 6 (2003), pp. 522-531
[21]
EF Juniper, PM O'Byrne, GH Guyatt, PJ Ferrie, DR King.
Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure asthma control.
Eur Resp J., 14 (1999), pp. 902-907
[22]
JA Hall, TS Stein, DL Roter, N Rieser.
Inaccuracies in physicians' perceptions of their patients.
Med Care., 37 (1999), pp. 1164-1168
[23]
EF Juniper, GH Guyatt, DH Feeny, et al.
Measuring quality of life in children with asthma.
Qual Life Res., 5 (1996), pp. 35-46
[24]
JL Malo, J L'Archeveque, C Trudeau, C D'Aquino, A Cartier.
Should we monitor peak expiratory flow rates or record symptoms with a simple diary in the management of asthma?.
J Allergy Clin Immunol., 91 (1993), pp. 702-709
[25]
E Martínez-Moragón, M Perpiñá, A Belloch, A de Diego, ME Martínez-Francés.
Percepcion de mejoría en los pacientes con asma.
Arch Bronconeumol., 38 (2002), pp. 468-472
[26]
T Oga, K Nishimura, M Tsukino, S Sato, T Hajiro, M Mishima.
Comparison of the responsiveness of different disease-specific helath status measures in patients with asthma.
Chest, 122 (2002), pp. 1228-1233
[27]
ML Moy, AL Fuhlbrigge, K Blumenschein, RH Chapman, AJ Zillich, KM Kuntz, et al.
Association between preference-based health-related quality of life an asthma severity.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol., 92 (2004), pp. 329-334
[28]
T van der Molen, BW Willemse, S Schokker, NH ten Hacken, DS Postma, EF Juniper.
Development, validity and responsiveness of the Clinical COPD Questionnaire.
Health Qual Life Outcomes, 1 (2003), pp. 13
[29]
Health Services Research Group.
A guide to direct measures of patient satisfaction in clinical practice.
Can Med Assoc J., 146 (1992), pp. 1727-1731
[30]
Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust.
Assessing helath status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria.
Qual Life Res., 11 (2002), pp. 193-205
[31]
GH Guyatt, DH Feeny, DL Patrick.
Measuring health-related quality of life.
Ann Intern Med., 118 (1993), pp. 622-629

This study received economic support from AstraZeneca, Spain, although the authors took sole responsibility for drafting this article

Copyright © 2006. Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica (SEPAR)
Archivos de Bronconeumología
Article options
Tools

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?