Journal Information
Vol. 36. Issue 6.
Pages 298-302 (June 2000)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 36. Issue 6.
Pages 298-302 (June 2000)
Full text access
Efecto del débito de nebulizadores tipo jet sobre el valor de la PC20 en niños asmáticos
Effect of output from jet nebulizers on PC20 values in asthmatic children
Visits
9155
P. Aguilar Miranda, J. Mallol Villablanca
Corresponding author
mri@lauca.usach.cl

Correspondencia: Clasificador 23. Correo 9. Providencia. Santiago de Chile.
Departamento de Medicina Respiratoria Infantil. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas. Hospital El Pino. Universidad de Santiago de Chile.
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Objetivo

Este estudio se realizó para medir el efecto de utilizar dos nebulizadores con débito diferente sobre la reactividad bronquial a metacolina en niños asmáticos.

Métodos

Veintisiete niños asmáticos atópicos, de 6 a 14 años de edad, inhalaron metacolina de acuerdo al método de Cockcroft hasta que sus FEV1 disminuyeran un 20% con respecto del valor control postsalino (PC20). Las pruebas de provocación bronquial se realizaron usando dos modelos diferentes de nebulizadores tipo jet: Ava Neb 1780 y Hudson UP Draft II 1730, cuyos débitos fueron de 205±13 mg/min y 356±31 mg/min, respectivamente (p<0,05).

Resultados

En 9/27 pacientes (33%) hubo diferencias significativas (una o más concentraciones dobles) en sus PC20 cuando se cambió un nebulizador por otro. Sin embargo, 7/9 niños presentaron significativamente una menor reactividad bronquial cuando las pruebas se realizaron con el jet nebulizador de menor débito.

Conclusiones

Este estudio sugiere que el uso de nebulizadores tipo jet con diferente débito puede influir notablemente sobre los resultados en las pruebas de provocación con metacolina en niños asmáticos. Esto último podría introducir sesgos significativos cuando se realizan mediciones comparativas de la reactividad bronquial, tanto en un mismo individuo como entre poblaciones.

Palabras clave:
Niños
Metacolina
Nebulizador tipo jet

This study aimed to assess the effects of two different nebulizer outputs on airway responsiveness to methacholine in asthmatic children. Twenty-seven atopic asthmatic children aged 6 to 14 years inhaled methacholine according to the Cockroft method until FEV1% had decreased 20% with respect to saline inhalation (PC20). The bronchial challenge tests were performed using two different types of jet nebulizer: Ava Neb 1780 and Hudson UP Draft II 1730, the outputs of which were 205±13 mg/min and 356±31 mg/min, respectively (p < 0.05). For 9 out of 27 patients (33%) the PC20 values were significantly different (one or more double concentrations) for the two nebulizers. However, 7 of those 9 children showed significantly lower bronchial responsiveness when the challenge tests were conducted with the low output jet nebulizer. This study suggests that using jet nebulizers with different outputs can markedly influence the results of methacholine challenge tests in asthmatic children. Such an influence could introduce significant bias in the assessment of bronchial responsiveness in comparative measurements in a single individual or in populations.

Key words:
Airway responsiveness
Asthmatic children
Methacholine
Nebulizers
Full text is only aviable in PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
G. Ryan, M.B. Dolovich, G. Obsminski, D.W. Cockcroft, E. Juniper, M.T. Newhouse.
Standardization of inhalation provocation test: influence of nebulizer output, particle size, and method of inhalation.
J Allergy Clin Immunol, 67 (1981), pp. 156-161
[2.]
C.J. Hartley-Sharpe, H. Booth, D.P. Johns, E.H. Walters.
Differences in aerosol output and airways responsiveness between the De Vilbiss 40 and 45 hand held nebulisers.
Thorax, 50 (1995), pp. 635-638
[3.]
National Heart, Lung, Blood Institute National Asthma Education Program Expert Panel Report.
Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma.
J Allergy Clin Immunol, 88 (1991), pp. 425-534
[4.]
American Thoracic, Society.
Standardization of spirometry 1994.
Update. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 152 (1995), pp. 1107-1136
[5.]
P.J. Sterk, L.M. Fabri, Ph.H. Quanjer, D.W. Cockcroft, P.M. O’Byrne, S.D. Anderson, et al.
Standardized challenge testing with pharmacological physical and sensitizing stimuli in adults.
Eur Respir J, 6 (1993), pp. 53-83
[6.]
D.W. Cockdroft, D.N. Killian, J.J.A. Mellon, F.E. Hargreave.
Bronchial reactivity to inhaled histamine: a method and clinical survey.
Clin Allergy;, (1977), pp. 235-243
[7.]
J. Mallol, P. Aguilar, S. Simonds.
Efecto sobre el valor de PC20 al emplear FEV1 más alto o más bajo para su cálculo.
Rev Chil Enf Respir, 12 (1996), pp. 7-11
[8.]
R.J. Knudson, R.C. Slatin, M.D. Lewobitz, B. Burrows.
The maximal expiratory flow-volume curve: normal standards, variability, and effects of age.
Am Rev Respir Dis, 113 (1976), pp. 587-600
[9.]
J. Mallol, J. Valderrama.
Interpolación y extrapolación computarizadas de la PC20 de metacolina usando diferentes modelos matemáticos.
Rev Chil Enf Respir, 13 (1997), pp. 17-25
[10.]
D.W. Cockcroft, T. Hurst, B. Gore.
Importance of evaporative water losses during standardized nebulized inhalation provocation tests.
Chest, 96 (1989), pp. 505-508
[11.]
F.E. Hargreave, G. Ryan, N.C. Thomson, P.M. O’Byrne, K. Latimer, E.F. Juniper, et al.
Bronchial responsiveness to histamine or methacholine in asthma: measurement and clinical significance.
J Allergy Clin Immunol, 68 (1981),
[12.]
J.M. Bland, D.G. Altman.
Comparing method of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading.
Lancet, 346 (1995), pp. 1085-1087
[13.]
R.S. Irwin, M.R. Pratter.
The value of pharmacologi bronchoprovocation challenge.
Med Clin North Am, 3 (1990), pp. 767-778
[14.]
J.O. Warner, C.K. Naspitz, G.J.A. Cropp.
Third International Consensus Statement on the Manegement of Childhood Asthma.
Pediatr Pulmol, 25 (1998), pp. 1-17
[15.]
O. Van Asperen, C.M. Mellis, R.T. South, S.J. Simpson.
Bronchial reactivity in cystic fibrosis with normal pulmonary function.
AJDC, 135 (1981), pp. 815-819
[16.]
R. Moreno, M. Gutiérrez, T. Beroíza, C. Álvarez, V. Acevedo, C. Lisboa.
Forma y posición de la curva dosis-respuesta a metacolina en las infecciones de la vía aérea superior.
Rev Chil Enf Respir, 5 (1989), pp. 190-196
[17.]
S.A. O’Connor, D.P. Jones, J.V. Collins, R.B. Heath, M.J. Campbell, M.H. Leighton.
Changes in pulmonary function after naturally acquired respiratory infection in normal persons.
Am Rev Respir Dis, 120 (1979), pp. 1087-1093
[18.]
J.E. Fish, J.F. Kelly.
Measurement of responsiveness in bronchoprovocation testing.
J Allergy Clin Immunol, 64 (1979), pp. 592-596
[19.]
H. Mochizuki, M. Mitsushashi, K. Tokuyama, K. Tajima, A. Morikawa, T. Kuruome.
A new method of estimating bronchial hyper-responsiveness in younger children.
Ann Allergy, 55 (1985), pp. 162-166
[20.]
P.J. Sterk, A. Plomp, J.F. Van De Vate, P.H. Quanjer.
Physical properties of aerosols produced by several jet and ultrasonic nebulizers.
Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir, 18 (1982), pp. 665-671
[21.]
M.C. Hollie, R.A. Malone, R.M. Skufka, H.S. Nelson.
Extreme variability in aerosol output of DeVilbiss 646 jet nebulizer.
Chest, 100 (1991), pp. 1339-1344
[22.]
W. Arossa, F. Quagliotti, M. Sala, S. Spinaci, G. De Candussio.
Different performance of two commercial nebulizers.
Respiration, 46 (1984), pp. 128-132
[23.]
J. Mallol, F. Cortes, L. Barrueto, J. Zuñiga.
Variabilidad en la función de nebulizadores tipo jet Hudson. Efecto del volumen de llenado.
Rev Chil Enf Respir, 10 (1994), pp. 25-33
[24.]
R. Ovalle, L. Espejo, J. Mallol.
Efecto del uso de aire comprimido u oxígeno sobre el débito de nebulizadores tipo jet.
Rev Chil Enf Respir, 10 (1994), pp. 287
[25.]
J. Mallol, D. Saa, S. Simmonds, F. Cortés.
Variabilidad en la función de nebulizadores tipo jet. Efecto del flujo de aire comprimido.
Rev Colomb Neumol, 6 (1994), pp. 50-54
[26.]
J. Kongerud, V. Soyseth, B. Johansen.
Room temperature influences output from the Wright jet nebulizer.
Eur Respir J, 2 (1989), pp. 681-684
[27.]
J.H. Dennis, A.J. Avery, E.H. Walters, D.J. Hendrick.
Calibration of aerosol output from the Mefar dosimeter: implications for epidemiological studies.
Eur Respir J, 5 (1992), pp. 1279-1282
[28.]
P.J.F.M. Merkus, E.E.M. Van Esen-Zandvliet, E. Parlevliet, G. Borsboom, P.J. Sterk, K.F. Kerrebijn, et al.
Changes of nebulized output over the years.
Eur Respir J, 5 (1992), pp. 488-491
[29.]
E.C. Smith, J. Denyer, A.H. Kendrick.
Comparison of twenty three nebulizer/compressor combinations for domiciliary use.
Eur Respir J, 8 (1995), pp. 1214-1221
Copyright © 2000. Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica
Archivos de Bronconeumología
Article options
Tools

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?