Journal Information
Vol. 17. Issue 2.
Pages 53-55 (March - April 1981)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 17. Issue 2.
Pages 53-55 (March - April 1981)
Full text access
Aislamiento de M. Tuberculosis, en funcion del grado de contaminacion del esputo
Isolation of m. tuberculosis in functio of the degree of contamination of the sputum.
Visits
4322
V. Ausina, C. Marti, B. Mirelis, N. Rabella
Servicio de Microbiología. Hospital de la Santa Cruz y San Pablo. Barcelona.
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Resumen

Un total de 1.496 esputos remitidos al laboratorio para cultivo de M. tuberculosis se han clasificado en siete subgrupos en base al grado de contaminación bucofaríngea según los criterios microscópicos propuestos por la American Society for Microbiology (Cumitech, 7).

De las 153 cepas de M. tuberculosis aisladas, 43 (28,1 %) procedían de esputos con gran contaminación bucofaríngea (subgrupos 1 y 2) y 89 (58,2 %) de esputos con escasa o nula contaminación (subgrupos 3, 4 y 5). Las diferencias en el número de aislamientos de ambos grupos son estadísticamente significativas (x2 = 15,39 P < 0,01). Sin embargo, ningún laboratorio clí-nico está autorizado a rechazar los esputos conalto grado de contaminación bucofaríngea destinados a cultivo de M. tuberculosis ya que la proporción global de aislamientos en este grupo de muestras es del 7,1 %.

Summary

A total of 1,496 sputum sent to the laboratory for culture of M. tuberculosis were classified into seven subgroups based on the degree of bucopharyngeal contamination according to the microscopic criteria proposed by the American Society for Microbiology.

Of. the 153 strains of M. tuberculosis that were isolated, 43 (28.1 %) carne from sputum with great buccopharyngeal contamination (subgroups 1 and 2); and 89 (58.2 %) from sputum with scarse or nuil contamination (subgroups 3, 4 and 5). The differences in the number of isolations of both groups are statistically significant (x2 = 14.39 P < 0.01). However, no clinical laboratory is authorized to reject sputum with high degree of buccopharyngeal contamination destined to the culture of M. tuberculosis as the global proportion of isolations in this group of samples is of 7.1 %.

Full text is only aviable in PDF
Bibliografia
[1.]
J.G. Bartlett, N.S. Brewer, K.J. Ryan.
Laboratory diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections.
Cumitech, 7,
[2.]
R.W. Geckler, D.H. Gremillion, C.K. Mcallister, C.H. Ellenbogen.
Microscopic and bacteriological comparison of paired sputa and transtracheal aspirates.
J. Clin. Microbiol., 6 (1977), pp. 396
[3.]
P.R. Murray, J.A. Washington II.
Microscopic and bacteriologic analysis of expectorated sputum.
Mayo Clin. Proc., 50 (1975), pp. 339
[4.]
H. Yeager, J. Lacy, L.D. Smith, C.A. Le Maistre.
A Quantitative studies of mycobacterial populations in sputum and saliva.
Am. Rev. Resp. Dis., 95 (1967), pp. 998
[5.]
C.J. Curione Jr., G.S. Kaneko, L.S. Voss, F. Hesse, R.F. Smith.
Gram stain evaluation of the quality of sputum specimens for mycobacterial culture.
J. Clin. Microbiol., 3 (1977), pp. 381
[6.]
A. Taquet, F. Tison.
Résultat de l’isolement des mycobactéries par le lauryl-sulfate de sodium.
Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 100 (1961), pp. 676
[7.]
H.J. Corper, R.E. Stoner.
An improved procedure for the diagnostic culture of mammalian tubercle bacilli.
J. Lab. Clin. Med., 31 (1946), pp. 1364
[8.]
G.P. Kubica, W.E. Dye.
Laboratory methods for clinical and public health mycobacteriology.
Public Health Service Publication, N.° 67-1547. Center for Disease Control, (1967),
[9.]
A.L. Vestal.
Procedures for the isolation and identification of mycobacteria.
Public Health Service Publication. N.° 77-8230. Center for Disease Control, (1977),
[10.]
E.H. Runyon, A.G. Karlson, G.P. Kubica, L.G. Wayne.
Mycobacterium. En Manual of Clinical Microbiology.
2.a Ed, American Society for Microbiology, (1974),
Copyright © 1981. Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica
Archivos de Bronconeumología
Article options
Tools

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?