Journal Information
Vol. 41. Issue 9.
Pages 499-504 (September 2005)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 41. Issue 9.
Pages 499-504 (September 2005)
Original Articles
Full text access
Usefulness of Fast ELISA Determination of D-Dimer Levels for Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism in an Emergency Room
Visits
5527
A. Friera-Reyesa,
Corresponding author
alfita1@telefonica.net

Correspondence: Dr. A. Friera-Reyes. Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico. Hospital de la Princesa. Diego de León, 62. 28006 Madrid. España
, P. Caballeroa, N. Ruiz-Giménezb, P. Artiedac, L. Domínguezd, E. Pérez-Amore, C. Suárezb, for the Venous Thromboembolic Disease Working Group
a Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain
b Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain
c Servicio de Análisis Clínico, Hospital de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain
d Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain
e Servicio de Neumología, Hospital de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Objective

To determine the sensitivity and negative predictive value of D-dimer levels measured by fast enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay (ELISA) in pulmonary embolism.

Patients and methods

Prospective study of consecutive patients with suspicion of pulmonary embolism attended in the Emergency Room of the Hospital de la Princesa in Madrid, Spain. Thromboembolism was diagnosed with an algorithm established in the hospital, and D-dimer levels were determined by fast ELISA (VIDAS D-dimer Assay) in each patient suspected of pulmonary embolism. Patients with negative findings from a test not considered a reference method for thromboembolism were followed for 3 months.

Results

Of 132 patients with clinical suspicion, 28 (21.2%) were positive and 104 (78.7%) were negative for embolism. D-dimer levels were below 0.5 μg/mL in 31 patients, 30 of whom did not have pulmonary thromboembolism whereas 1 did. D-dimer levels were abowe 0.5 μg/mL in 101 patients; thromboembolism did not occur in 74 of these but was reported in the remaining 27. For a value of 1 μg/mL, 66 patients had values below the cut off, 3 of whom presented pulmonary embolism. The remaining 66 patients had D-dimer levels above or equal to 1 μg/mL; 25 of them had a positive diagnosis for embolism and 41 had a negative diagnosis. Sensitivity and negative predictive values were 96.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 79.8%-99.9%) and 96.8% (95% CI, 81.5%-98.8%), respectively, at a cut off of 0.5 μg/mL; and 89.2% (95% CI, 70.6%-97.2%) and 95.45% (95% CI, 86.4%-98.8 %), respectively, at a cut off of 1 μg/mL.

Conclusions

In an emergency room, thromboembolism can be excluded if plasma levels of D-dimer measured by fast ELISA are below 0.5 μg/mL because of the high negative predictive value at this cut off.

Key Words:
Pulmonary embolism
Thromboembolic disease
D-dimer
Objetivo

Determinar la sensibilidad y el valor predictivo negativo del dímero-D, por enzimoinmunoanálisis (ELISA) rápido, en la embolia pulmonar.

Pacientes y méatodos

Estudio prospectivo de pacientes atendidos consecutivamente por sospecha clínica de embolia en el Servicio de Urgencias del Hospital de la Princesa de Madrid. El diagnóstico de tromboembolia se basó en el algoritmo establecido en el hospital, y se determinó el dímero-D por ELISA (VIDAS) en cada paciente con sospecha de embolia pulmonar. A los pacientes con resultado negativo para tromboembolia, establecido por una prueba no considerada de referencia, se les realizó seguimiento clínico a los 3 meses.

Resultados

De 132 pacientes con sospecha clínica, 28 (21,2%) fueron positivos y 104 (78,7%) negativos para embolia. El dímero-D fue < a 0,5 μg/ml en 31 pacientes, de los que 30 no tuvieron tromboembolia pulmonar y 1 sí la tuvo. De los 101 pacientes con dímero-D > 0,5 μg/ml, en 74 no se produjo tromboembolia y en 27 sí.

Si se considera como punto de corte 1 μg/ml, hubo 66 pacientes con valores inferiores, de los que 3 presentaron embolia pulmonar. Otros 66 pacientes mostraron un dímero-D ≤ 1 μg/ml; de ellos, 25 tuvieron un diagnóstico positivo para embolia y 41 negativo. La sensibilidad y el valor predictivo negativo para 0,5 μg/ml fue de 96,4 (intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%, 79,8-99,9) y 96,8 (IC del 95%, 81,5-98,8), respectivamente; para 1 μg/ml fue de 89,2 (IC del 95%, 70,6-97,2) y 95,45 (IC del 95%, 86,4-98,8), respectivamente.

Conclusiones

Los valores de dímero-D plasmático, determinados por la técnica de ELISA rápido (VIDAS), < 0,5 μg/ml permiten excluir con alto valor predictivo negativo una tromboembolia pulmonar en un servicio de urgencias.

Palabras clave:
Embolia pulmonar
Enfermedad tromboembólica
Dímero-D
Full text is only aviable in PDF
REFERENCES
[1]
A Palla, C Giuntini.
Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: have we reached our goal?.
Respiration, 71 (2004), pp. 22-23
[2]
The PIOPED Investigators.
Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. Results of the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED).
JAMA, 263 (1990), pp. 2753-2759
[3]
N Schibany, D Fleischmann, C Thallinger, A Schibany, J Hahne, A Ba-Salamah, et al.
Equipment availability and diagnostic strategies for suspected pulmonary embolism in Austria.
Eur Radiol, 11 (2001), pp. 2287-2294
[4]
SW Rathbun, GE Raskob, TL Whitsett.
Sensitivity and specificity of helical computed tomography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a systematic review.
Ann Intern Med, 132 (2000), pp. 22732
[5]
JR Mayo, M Remy-Jardin, NL Müller, J Remy, DF Worsley, C Hossein-Foucher, et al.
Pulmonary embolism: prospective comparison of spiral CT with ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy.
Radiology, 205 (1997), pp. 447-452
[6]
Y Ruiz, P Caballero, JL Caniego, A Friera, MJ Olivera, D Tagarro, et al.
Prospective comparison of helical CT with angiography in pulmonary embolism: global and selective vascular territory analysis. Interobserver agreement.
Eur Radiol, 13 (2003), pp. 823-829
[7]
A Perrier, S Desmarais, MJ Miron, P Moerloose, R Lepage, D Slosman, et al.
Non-invasive diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in outpatients.
[8]
PS Wells, JS Ginsberg, DR Anderson, C Keeron, M Gent, AG Turpie, et al.
Use of a clinical model for safe management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.
Ann Intern Med, 129 (1998), pp. 997-1005
[9]
F Uresandi, J Blanquer, F Conget, MA de Gregorio, JL Lobo, R Otero, et al.
Guía para el diagnóstico, tratamiento y seguimiento de la embolia pulmonar.
Arch Bronconeumol, 40 (2004), pp. 580-594
[10]
GJ Caine, GYH Lip.
D-dimer assessment of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.
Arch Intern Med, 163 (2003), pp. 243
[11]
DA Froehling, PL Elkin, SJ Swensen, JA Heit, VS Pankratz, JH Ryu.
Sensitivity and specificity of the semiquantitative latex agglutination D-dimer assay for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism as defined by computed tomographic angiography.
Mayo Clin Proc, 79 (2004), pp. 164-168
[12]
J Tillie-Leblond, I Mastora, F Radenne, S Paillard, AB Tonnel, J Remy, et al.
Risk of pulmonary embolism after a negative spiral CT angiogram in patients with pulmonary disease: 1 year clinical follow-up study.
Radiology, 223 (2002), pp. 461-467
[13]
A Friera, MJ Olivera, C Suárez, N Ruiz-Giménez, P Caballero.
Clinical validity of negative helical computed tomography for clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism.
Respiration, 71 (2004), pp. 30-36
[14]
PF Fedullo, V Tapson.
The evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism.
N Engl J Med, 349 (2003), pp. 1247-1256
[15]
I Kutinsky, S Blakey, V Roche.
Normal D-dimer levels in patients with pulmonary embolism.
Arch Intern Med, 159 (1999), pp. 1569-1572
[16]
MC Janssen, AE Heebels, M de Metz, H Verbruggen, H Wellersheim, S Janssen, et al.
Reliability of five rapid D-dimer assays compared to ELISA in the exclusion of deep-vein thrombosis.
Thromb Haemost, 77 (1997), pp. 262-266
[17]
N Ruiz-Giménez, A Friera, P Artieda, P Caballero, P Sánchez-Moliní, M Morales, et al.
Rapid D-dimer test combined with clinical model for deep vein thrombosis. Validation with ultrasonography and clinical follow-up in 383 patients.
Thromb Haemost, 91 (2004), pp. 1237-1246
[18]
P de Moerloose, S Desmarais, H Bounameaux, G Reber, A Perrier, G Dupuy, et al.
Contribution of a new, rapid individual and quantitative automated D-dimer ELISA to exclude pulmonary embolism.
Thromb Haemost, 75 (1996), pp. 11-23
[19]
DJ Brotman, JB Segal, JT Jani, BG Petty, TS Kickler.
Limitations of D-dimer testing in unselected inpatients with suspected venous thromboembolism.
Am J Med, 114 (2003), pp. 276-282
[20]
Goldhaber SZ, Simons GR, Elliot CG. Quantitative plasma D-dimer levels among patients undergoing pulmonary angiography for suspected pulmonary embolism. JAMA. 193;270:2819-22.
[21]
MJHA Kruip, MJ Slob, JHEM Schijen, C van der Heul, HR Büller.
Use of a clinical decision rule in combination with D-dimer concentration in diagnosis workup of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.
Arch Intern Med, 162 (2002), pp. 1631-1635
[22]
MD Brown, BH Rowe, MJ Reeves, JM Bermingham, SZ Goldhaber.
The accuracy of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay D-dimer test in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis.
Ann Intern Med, 40 (2002), pp. 133-144
[23]
D Jiménez Castro, E Pérez Rodríguez, L Montaner, J Flores, G Díaz Nuevo.
Valor diagnóstico del dímero D en el embolismo pulmonar y la neumonía.
Respiration (Spanish edition), 4 (2002), pp. 229-233
Copyright © 2005. Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica (SEPAR)
Archivos de Bronconeumología
Article options
Tools

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?