Journal Information
Vol. 42. Issue 12.
Pages 627-632 (December 2006)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 42. Issue 12.
Pages 627-632 (December 2006)
Original Articles
Full text access
Recording the Daily Physical Activity of COPD Patients With an Accelerometer: An Analysis of Agreement and Repeatability
Visits
5036
Vanesa Loresa,
Corresponding author
vloresg@hotmail.com

Correspondence: Dra. V. Lores. Julio Palacios, 10, 6.° A. 28029 Madrid. España
, Francisco García-Ríoa, Blas Rojoa, Sergio Alcoleaa, Olga Medianob
a Sección de Neumología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
b Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain
This item has received
Article information
Objective

The purpose of this study was to assess the agreement between different measurements of mean daily physical activity taken over a week in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with an accelerometer and to analyze the medium-term repeatability of these measurements.

Patients and methods

The study enrolled 12 healthy control subjects and 23 patients with stable COPD (mean [SD] forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] of 45% [13%] of predicted and a ratio of FEV1 to forced vital capacity of 53% [13%]). Accelerometer output, measured in vector magnitude units, was recorded in a physical activity log for a 1-week period. The results were then analyzed to compare output for a conventional recording period (Friday to Sunday) to that for 2 other periods (Monday to Wednesday and Tuesday to Thursday). The measurements were repeated 3 to 5 weeks later.

Results

Activity counts were lower in the COPD patients than in the control subjects (184 [99] vs 314 [75]; P<.001). In the COPD patients, the results for the Friday to Sunday period correlated well with the results for both the Monday to Wednesday period (95% confidence interval, −29.21 to 28.81) and the Tuesday to Thursday period (95% confidence interval, −32.13 to 28.43). There were no significant differences in terms of medium-term repeatability of accelerometer readings between the COPD group and the control group (repeatability coefficient of 11.2% [4.6%] and 8.5% [4.7%], respectively).

Conclusions

Both agreement between the different measurements of physical activity taken during a 1-week period and medium-term repeatability for COPD patients and control subjects were very good.

Key words:
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
Physical activity
Exercise
Follow-up
Repeatability
Objetivo

Evaluar la concordancia intrasemanal de la medida con un acelerómetro de la actividad física cotidiana en pacientes con enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC). Analizar la reproducibilidad del registro a medio plazo.

Pacientes y métodos

Se estudió a 23 pacientes con EPOC estable -cifra media (± desviación estándar) de volu-men espiratorio forzado en el primer segundo del 45 ± 13% y cociente entre este parámetro y la capacidad vital forzada del 53 ± 13%- y 12 sujetos sanos. Se efectuó un registro con acelerómetro durante una semana y se analizó el vector de desplazamiento (VMU) en el período convencional (viernes a sábado) y en 2 períodos alternativos (lunes a miércoles y martes a jueves). El registro se repitió a las 3-5 semanas.

Resultados

El VMU fue menor en los pacientes con EPOC que en los controles (184 ± 99 frente a 314 ± 75; p < 0,001). En el grupo con EPOC el registro de viernes a do-mingo mantenía una buena relación con el efectuado de lunes a miércoles (intervalo de concordancia del 95%, −29,21 a 28,81) y con el realizado de martes a jueves (intervalo de concordancia del 95%, −32,13 a 28,43). El coeficiente de reproducibilidad del VMU a medio plazo de los pacientes con EPOC (11,2 ± 4,6%) no resultó ser significativamente dife-rente del de los controles (8,5 ± 4,7%).

Conclusiones

El registro de la actividad física cotidiana mediante un acelerómetro alcanza una elevada concordancia entre períodos de análisis comprendidos dentro de una misma semana y muestra una notable reproducibilidad a medio plazo, tanto en sujetos sanos como en pacientes con EPOC.

Palabras clave:
EPOC
Actividad física
Ejercicio
Seguimiento
Reproducibilidad
Full text is only aviable in PDF
REFERENCES
[1]
RA Pauwels, AS Buist, PMA Calverley, CR Jenkins, SS Hurd.
Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. NHLBI/WHO Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) workshop summary.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 163 (2001), pp. 1256-1276
[2]
VS Pena, M Miravitlles, R Gabriel, CA Jiménez-Ruiz, C Villasante, JF Masa, et al.
Geographic variations in prevalence and underdiagnosis of COPD: results of the IBERPOC multicentre epidemiological study.
Chest, 118 (2000), pp. 981-989
[3]
C Fletcher, R Peto.
The natural history of chronic obstruction.
Med J, 1 (1977), pp. 1645-1648
[4]
NR Anthonisen.
Prognosis in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: results from a multicenter clinical trials.
Am Rev Respir Dis, 133 (1989), pp. 95-99
[5]
J Marín.
Viejos y nuevos criterios para clasificar la EPOC.
Arch Bronconeumol, 40 (2004), pp. 9-15
[6]
J Clotet, X Gómez-Arbonés, C Ciria, JM Albalad.
La espirometría es un buen método para la detección y el seguimiento de la EPOC en fumadores de alto riesgo en atención primaria.
Arch Bronconeumol, 40 (2004), pp. 155-159
[7]
CAJ Katelaars, MA Schlösser, R Mostert, RJG Huyer Abu-Saad Halfens, EFM Wouters.
Determinants of health-related quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Thorax, 51 (1996), pp. 39-43
[8]
DW Mapel, JS Hurley, FJ Frost, HV Petersen, MA Picchi, DB Coultas.
Health care utilization in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Arch Intern Med, 160 (2000), pp. 2653-2658
[9]
C Sanjuas Benito.
Medición de la calidad de vida: ¿cuestionarios genéricos o específicos?.
Arch Bronconeumol, 41 (2005), pp. 107-109
[10]
PW Jones, FH Quirk, CM Baveystock, P Littlejohns.
A self complete measure of health status for chronic airflow limitation.
Am Rev Respir Dis, 145 (1992), pp. 1321-1327
[11]
CG Cote, JM Marín, BR Celli.
Factors that predict health care resources utilization in COPD.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 159 (1999), pp. A912
[12]
ME Martínez Francés, M Perpiñá Tordera, EM Belloch Fuster Martínez Moragón, A de Diego Damiá.
¿Cómo valorar percepción de la disnea inducida en la EPOC?.
Arch Bronconeumol, 40 (2004), pp. 149-154
[13]
O Bauerle, CA Chrusch, M Younes.
Mechanisms by which COPD affects exercise tolerance.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 157 (1998), pp. 57-68
[14]
DE O'Donnell, JC Bertley, LK Chau, KA Webb.
Qualitative aspects of exertional breathlessness in chronic airflow limitation.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 155 (1997), pp. 109-115
[15]
M Montes de Oca, SH Torres, Y González, E Romero, N Hernández, C Talamo.
Cambios en la tolerancia al ejercicio, calidad vida relacionada con la salud y características de los músculos periféricos después de 6 semanas de entrenamiento en pacientes con EPOC.
Arch Bronconeumol, 41 (2005), pp. 413-418
[16]
RA Rabinovich, J Vilaro, J Roca.
Evaluación de la tolerancia ejercicio en pacientes con EPOC.
Prueba de marcha de 6 minutos Arch Bronconeumol, 40 (2004), pp. 80-85
[17]
B Preusser, M Winningham.
Validating a direct measure of energy expenditure with daily activity in patients with COPD.
Am J Repir Crit Care Med, 151 (1995), pp. A682
[18]
JF Nichols, CG Morgan, JA Sarkin, JF Sallis, KJ Calfas.
Validity, reliability, and calibration of the Tritrac accelerometer as a measure of physical activity.
Med Sci Sports Exerc, 31 (1999), pp. 908-912
[19]
BG Steele, L Holt, B Belza, S Ferris, S Lakshminaryan, DM Buchner.
Quantitating physical activity in COPD using a triaxial accelerometer.
Chest, 117 (2000), pp. 1359-1367
[20]
GS Bonni, B Belza, K Cain, C Warms.
Bodies in motion: monitoring daily activity and exercise with motion sensors in people with chronic pulmonary disease.
J Rehabil Res Dev, 5 (2003), pp. 45-58
[21]
American Thoracic Society.
Standardization of spirometry. 1994 update.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 152 (1995), pp. 1107-1136
[22]
H Quanjer, GJ Trammeling, JE Cotes, OF Pedersen, R Peslin, JC Yernault.
Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows.
Eur Respir J, 6 (1993), pp. 5-40
[23]
P Armitage, G Berry.
Statistical methods in medical research, pp. 296-312
[24]
JM Bland, DG Altman.
Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurements.
Lancet, 8 (1986), pp. 307-310
[25]
GJ Welk, SN Blair, K Wood, S Jones, RW Thompson.
A comparative evaluation of three accelerometry-based physical activity monitors.
Med Sci Sports Exerc, 32 (2002), pp. S489-s497
[26]
CE Matthews, BE Ainsworth, RW Thompson, DR Bassett Jr.
Sources of variance in daily physical activity levels as measured by an accelerometer.
Med Sci Sports Exerc, 34 (2002), pp. 1376-1381
[27]
JF Nichols, CG Moragan, JA Sarkin, JF Sallis.
Validity, reliability and calibration of the Tritrac accelerometers as a measure of physical activity.
Med Sci Sport Exerc, 28 (1997), pp. 908-912
[28]
G Kochersberger, E McConnell, MN Kuchibhatla, C Pieper.
The reliability, validity and stability of a measure of physical activity in the elderly.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 77 (1996), pp. 793-795
[29]
RA Washburn, TC Cook, RE Laporte.
The objective assessment of physical activity in an occupationally active group.
J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 29 (1989), pp. 279-284

This study was partially funded by grants from the Spanish Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery (SEPAR) (2004) and NeumoMadrid.

Copyright © 2006. Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica (SEPAR)
Archivos de Bronconeumología
Article options
Tools

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?