Journal Information
Vol. 46. Issue S7.
Neumología de urgencias
Pages 26-30 (October 2010)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 46. Issue S7.
Neumología de urgencias
Pages 26-30 (October 2010)
Full text access
Neumonía adquirida en la comunidad
Community-acquired pneumonia
Visits
63120
José Blanquera,
Corresponding author
blanquer_jos@gva.es

Autor para correspondencia.
, Francisco Sanzb
a Unidad Cuidados Intensivos Respiratorios, Hospital Clínic Universitari, Valencia, España
b Servicio de Neumología, Consorci Hospital General Universitari, Valencia, España
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Resumen

La estratificación del riesgo de la neumonía adquirida en la comunidad (NAC) a su llegada a urgencias médicas es la clave principal para diferenciar los pacientes con NAC en tres subgrupos según el lugar donde se debe efectuar el tratamiento inicial: extrahospitalario, ingreso en salas de hospitalización, requerimiento de ingreso en la unidad de cuidados intensivos (UCI), dadas las dificultades inherentes a conocer la etiología causal de la NAC (el diagnóstico etiológico se alcanza sólo en 40–60% de los casos). Las dos escalas de riesgo más usadas son: el Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) o escala de Fine y el CURB-65, útiles sobre todo para evaluar la necesidad de ingreso hospitalario. Los criterios de la normativa ATS-IDSA de 2007 son los más utilizados para valorar el ingreso del paciente con NAC en la UCI. Las posibles diferencias etiológicas y evolutivas de los tres grupos de pacientes ya citados son la base de la diversidad de pruebas diagnósticas y de tratamiento empírico que requerirán cada uno de ellos, aunque en los tres subgrupos se ha de contemplar la posible etiología neumocócica, dado que Streptococcus pneumoniae es el agente causal más frecuente de la NAC en cada uno de ellos. Se considera esencial una nueva evaluación del estado clínico del paciente a las 48 h de haber iniciado el tratamiento empírico.

Palabras clave:
Neumonía adquirida en la comunidad
Escala de Fine
CURB-65
Escala de ATS-IDSA para ingreso en unidad
de cuidados intensivos
Tratamiento empírico
Abstract

Given the inherent difficulty of determining the cause of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) (an etiological diagnosis is only established in 40–60 % of cases), assessment of severity plays a key role in stratifying CAP patients arriving at the emergency department in three groups according to the need for hospitalization: outpatient, hospitalization, and the need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The two most common severity scales used to assess the need for hospital admission in CAP are the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) and CURB-65 score while ATS-IDSA 2007 criteria are specific to evaluate the need for ICU admission. Because of the possible etiological differences between the three groups, distinct etiological tests and empiric antibiotic treatments will be required in each subgroup, although a possible pneumococcal etiology should always be considered, since Streptococcus pneumoniae is the most common etiology of CAP in all three groups. Clinical status must be reassessed 48 hours after empirical antibiotic treatment is started.

Keywords:
Community-acquired pneumonia
Fine's score
CURB-65
ATS-IDSA criteria for UCI admission
Empirical treatment
Full text is only aviable in PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
C. Jokinen, L. Heiskanen, H. Juvonen, S. Kallinen, S. Karkola, M. Kuorpi, et al.
Incidence of community-acquired pneumonia in the population of four municipalities in eastern Finland.
Am J Epidemiol, 137 (1993), pp. 977-988
[2.]
J. Almirall, I. Bolíbar, J. Vidal, G. Sauca, P. Coll, B. Niklason, et al.
Epidemiology of community-acquired pneumonia in adults; a population-based study.
Eur Respir J, 15 (2000), pp. 757-763
[3.]
M.J. Fine, M.A. Smith, C.A. Carson, S.S. Mutha, S.S. Sankey, L.A. Weissfeld, et al.
Prognosis and outcomes of patients with-community-acquired pneumonia. A meta-analysis.
JAMA., 275 (1996), pp. 134-141
[4.]
I. Alfageme, J. Aspa, S. Bello, J. Blanquer, R. Blanquer, L. Borderías, et al.
Normativas para el diagnóstico y el tratamiento de la neumonía adquirida en la comunidad (SEPAR).
Arch Bronconeumol, 41 (2005), pp. 272-289
[5.]
R. Riquelme, A. Torres, M. El-Ebiary, J.P. De la Bellacasa, R. Estruch, J. Mensa, et al.
Community-acquired pneumonia in the elderly: clinical and nutritional aspects.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 154 (1996), pp. 1450-1455
[6.]
M.J. Fine, T.E. Auble, D.M. Yealy, B.H. Hanusa, L.A. Weissfeld, D.E. Singer, et al.
A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia.
N Engl J Med, 336 (1997), pp. 243-250
[7.]
W.S. Lim, M.M. Van der Eerden, R. Laing, W.G. Boersma, N. Karalus, G.I. Town, et al.
Defining community acquired pneumonia severity on presentation to hospital: an international derivation and validation study.
Thorax, 58 (2003), pp. 377-382
[8.]
M.I. Restrepo, E.M. Mortensen, J. Rello, J. Brody, A. Anzueto.
Late admisión to the ICU in patients with community-acquired pneumonia is associated with higher mortality.
Chest, 137 (2010), pp. 552-557
[9.]
L.A. Mandell, R.G. Wunderink, A. Anzueto, J.G. Bartlett, G.D. Campbell, N.C. Dean, et al.
Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults.
Clin Infect Dis, 44 (2007), pp. S27-S72
[10.]
J. Phua, K.C. See, Y.H. Chan, L.S. Widjaja, N.W. Aung, W.J. Ngerng, et al.
Validation and clinical implication of the IDSA/ATS minor criteria for severe community-acquired pneumonia.
Thorax, 64 (2009), pp. 598-603
[11.]
P.G. Charles, R. Wolfe, M. Whitby, M.J. Fine, A.J. Fuller, R. Stirling, et al.
SMART-COP: a tool for predicting the need for intensive respiratory or vasopressor support in community-acquired pneumonia.
Clin Infec Dis, 47 (2008), pp. 375-384
[12.]
Y. Hirakata, K. Yanagihara, S. Kurihara, K. Izulimawa, M. Seki, Y. Miyazaki, et al.
Comparison of usefulness of plasma procalcitonin and C-reactive protein measurements for estimation of severity in adults with community-acquired pneumonia.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 61 (2008), pp. 170-174
[13.]
M. Woodhead.
Community-acquired pneumonia in Europe: causative pathogens and resistance patterns.
Eur Respir J, 20 (2002), pp. 20-27
[14.]
M. Mitka.
JCAHO tweaks emergency departments’ pneumonia treatment standards.
JAMA, 297 (2007), pp. 1758-1759
[15.]
M.L. Metersky, T.A. Sweeney, M.B. Getzow, F. Siddiqui, W. Nsa, D.W. Bratzler.
Antibiotic timing and diagnostic uncertainty in Medicare patients with pneumonia: is it reasonable to expect all patients to receive antibiotics within 4 hours?.
Chest, 130 (2006), pp. 16-21
[16.]
J. Aspa, O. Rajas, F. Rodríguez de Castro, J. Blanquer, R. Zalacain, A. Fenoll, et al.
Drug-resistant pneumococcal pneumonia: Clinical relevante and related factors.
Clin Infect Dis, 38 (2004), pp. 787-798
[17.]
R.B. Brown, P. Ianini, P. Gross, M. Kunkel.
Impact of initial antibiotic choice on clinical outcomes in community-acquired pneumonia: analysis of a hospital claims-made database.
Chest, 123 (2003), pp. 1503-1511
[18.]
R. Menéndez, A. Torres, R. Zalacaín, J. Aspa, J. Martín Villasclaras, L. Borderías, et al.
Risks factors of treatment failure in community acquired pneumonia: implications for disease outcome.
Thorax, 59 (2004), pp. 960-965
[19.]
F. Arancibia, T.T. Bauer, S. Ewig, J. Mensa, J. González, M.S. Niederman, et al.
Community-acquired pneumonia due to gram-negative bacteria and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: incidence, risks factors and prognosis.
Arch Intern Med, 162 (2002), pp. 1849-1858
[20.]
H. Von Baum, T. Welte, R. Marre, N. Suttorp, S. Ewig, for the CAPNETZ study group.
Community-acquired pneumonia through Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: diagnosis, incidence and predictors.
Eur Respir J, 35 (2010), pp. 598-605
[21.]
M. Woodhead, F. Blasi, S. Ewig, G. Huchon, M. Ieven, A. Ortqvist, et al.
ERS Guidelines for the management of adult lower respiratory tract infections.
Eur Respir J, 26 (2005), pp. 1138-1180
Copyright © 2010. Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica
Archivos de Bronconeumología
Article options
Tools

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?