Journal Information
Vol. 39. Issue 9.
Pages 394-399 (September 2003)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 39. Issue 9.
Pages 394-399 (September 2003)
Full text access
Valor diagnóstico del cultivo cuantitativo del aspirado endotraqueal en la neumonía adquirida durante la ventilación mecánica. Estudio multicéntrico
Diagnostic Value of Quantitative Cultures of Endotracheal Aspirate in Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: a Multicenter Study
Visits
22264
M. Valencia Arangoa, A. Torres Martíb,*, J. Insausti Ordeñanac, F. Álvarez Lermad, N. Carrasco Joaquinete, M. Herranz Casadof, J.P. Tirapu Leónc, Grupo de Estudio de la Neumonía Relacionada con Ventilación Mecánica *, Grupo de Trabajo de Enfermedades Infecciosas de la Semicyuc
a Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos. Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana. Medellín. Colombia. Hospital Clínic. Barcelona. España
b Hospital Clínic. Barcelona. España
c Hospital de Navarra. Pamplona-Iruña. Navarra. España
d Hospital del Mar. Barcelona. España
e Hospital de La Princesa. Madrid. España
f Hospital Río Hortega. Valladolid. España
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Objetivo

Estudiar la validez del aspirado traqueal (AT) con cultivos cuantitativos y compararla con el catéter telescopado (CTP) en el diagnóstico de la neumonía relacionada con la ventilación mecánica (NVM).

Método

Estudio prospectivo y multicéntrico en el que se incluyó a pacientes sometidos a ventilación mecánica durante más de 72 h. A los pacientes con sospecha clínica de NVM se les realizaron AT y posteriormente CTP. A todas estas muestras se les practicó un cultivo cuantitativo. De acuerdo con criterios clínicos, radiológicos, de seguimiento y autópsicos se dividieron los pacientes en casos con neumonía y sin neumonía (controles). Se escogió como punto de corte para el CTP ≥ 103 unidades formadoras de colonias (ufc)/ml y para el AT se evaluó con ≥ 105 y > 106 ufc/ml, respectivamente.

Resultados

Se estudió a 120 pacientes; se consideró que 84 presentaban neumonía y 36 no la presentaban (controles). La sensibilidad fue del 54% (intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%, 42–64%), el 71% (IC del 95%, 60-81%) y el 68% (IC del 95%, 57–78%) para AT ≥ 106, AT ≥ 105 y CTP, respectivamente. Las especificidades encontradas fueron del 75% (IC del 95%, 58 – 88%), el 58% (IC del 95%, 41–74%) y el 75% (IC del 95%, 58 –88%), respectivamente. El organismo aislado más frecuentemente fue Staphylococcus aureus tanto por AT como por CTP, seguido por Pseudomomonas aeruginosa en AT y por Haemophilus influenzae en CTP. No se encontraron diferencias significativas entre la sensibilidad del AT ≥ 105 y del CTP, y tampoco con las especificidades del AT ≥ 106 y el CTP.

Conclusiones

Cuando se utiliza un punto de corte de 106 ufc/ml o mayor para el AT en el diagnostico de la NVM se obtienen porcentajes de especificidad similares a los obtenidos con el CTP, y con el punto de corte 105 o mayor, porcentajes de sensibilidad aceptables. Los cultivos cuantitativos del AT pueden considerarse aceptables en el diagnóstico de la NVM..

Palabras clave:
Neumonía
Ventilación mecánica
Aspirado traqueal
Objective

To study the validity of quantitative cultures of tracheal aspirate (TA) in comparison with the plugged telescoping catheter (PTC) for the diagnosis of mechanical ventilator- associated pneumonia.

Method

Prospective multicenter study enrolling patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for longer than 72 hours. TA samples were collected from patients with suspected ventilator- associated pneumonia, followed by PTC sampling. Quantitative cultures were performed on all samples. Patients were classified according to the presence or not of pneumonia, based on clinical and radiologic criteria, clinical course and autopsy findings. The cutoff points were ≥103 colony-forming units (cfu)/mL for PTC cultures; the TA cutoffs analyzed were ≥105 and ≥106 cfu/mL.

Results

Of the 120 patients studied, 84 had diagnoses of pneumonia and 36 did not (controls). The sensitivity values for TA≥106, TA≥105, and PTC, respectively, were 54% (95% confidence interval [CI], 42%–64%), 71% (95% CI, 60%–81%), and 68% (95% CI, 57%–78%). The specificity values were 75% (95% CI, 58%–88%), 58% (95% CI, 41%–74%), and 75% (95% CI, 58%–88%), respectively. Staphylococcus aureus was the microorganism most frequently isolated in both TA and PTC samples, followed in frequency by Pseudomomonas aeruginosa in TA samples and Haemophilus influenzae in PTC samples. No significant differences were found between the sensitivity of TA ≥ 105 and that of PTC, nor between the specificities of TA ≥ 106 and PTC.

Conclusions

No differences in the specificities of PTC and TA were found when a TA cutoff of ≥106 cfu/ml was used. Moreover, at a cutoff of ≥105 the sensitivity of TA was not statistically different from that of PTC. Quantitative cultures of TA can be considered acceptable for the diagnosis of ventilator- associated pneumonia.

Key words:
Pneumonia
Mechanical ventilation
Tracheal aspirate
Full text is only aviable in PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
J.Y. Fagon, J. Chastre, A.J. Hance, M. Guiguet, J.L. Trouillet, Y. Domart, et al.
Detection of nosocomial lung infection in ventilated patients: use of a protected specimen brush and quantitative culture techniques in 147 patients.
Am Rev Resp Dis, 138 (1988), pp. 110-116
[2.]
F. Álvarez-Lerma, M.A. De la Cal, M. Palomar, J. Insausti.
Olaecha P and the Spanish study group of the surveillance of ICU-acquired infection. Nosocomial infections rates as an indicator of quality care in critically ill patients.
Intens Care Med, 23 (1997), pp. 154
[3.]
A. Torres, J.P. De la Bellacasa, A. Xaubet, J. González, R. Rodríguez- Roisin, M.T. Jiménez de Anta, et al.
Diagnostic value of quantitative cultures of bronchoalveolar lavage and telescoping plugged catheter in mechanically ventilated patients with bacterial pneumonia.
Am Rev Respir Dis, 140 (1989), pp. 306-310
[4.]
M. El-Ebiary, A. Torres, J. González, J. Puig de la Bellacasa, C. García, M.T. Jiménez de Anta, et al.
Quantitative cultures of endotracheal aspirates for the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Am Rev Respir Dis, 148 (1993), pp. 1552-1557
[5.]
R.A. Salata, M.M. Lederman, D.M. Shales, M.R. Jacobs, E. Eckstein, J.J. Tweardy.
Diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonia in intubated, intensive care unit patients.
Am Rev Respir Dis, 135 (1987), pp. 426-432
[6.]
N.S. Niederman, A. Torres, W. Summer.
Invasive diagnostic testing is not needed routinely to manage suspected ventilator associated pneumonia.
Am J Resp Crit Care Med, 150 (1994), pp. 565-569
[7.]
J. Chastre, J.Y. Fagon.
Invasive diagnostic testing should be used to manage ventilated patients with suspected pneumonia.
Am J Res Crit Care Med, 150 (1994), pp. 570-574
[8.]
D. Wermert, C.H. Marquette, M.C. Copin, F. Wallet, A. Fraticelli, P. Ramon, et al.
Influence of pulmonary bacteriology and histology on the yield of diagnostic procedures in ventilator-acquired pneumonia.
Am J Resp Crit Care Med, 158 (1998), pp. 139-147
[9.]
G.U. Meduri.
Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Clinics in Chest Medicine, 16 (1995), pp. 61-93
[10.]
J. Insausti, J.M. Guergue, M. Kutz, J.P. Tirapu, J. Barado, J.Y. Yoldi, et al.
Identificación de neumonía en pacientes sometidos a ventilación mecánica. Utilidad de las técnicas invasivas.
Anales Sist San Navarra, 20 (1997), pp. 47-52
[11.]
H. Correa, J. Rello.
Diagnóstico de neumonía en pacientes intubados: ¿una controversia sin salida?.
Enf Infecc Microbiol Clin, 15 (1997), pp. 2-7
[12.]
J.R. Le Gall, S. Lemeshow, F. Saulnier.
A new simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study.
Jama, 270 (1993), pp. 2957-3263
[13.]
J. Pugin, R. Auckenthaler, N. Mili, J.P. Janssens, P.D. Lew, P. Juter.
Diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia by bacteriologic analysis of bronchoscopic and nonbronchoscopic blind bronchoalveolar lavage fluid.
Am Rev Respir Dis, 143 (1991), pp. 1121-1129
[14.]
J. Chastre, J.Y. Fagon, P. Soler, M. Bornet, Y. Domart, J.L. Trouillet, et al.
Diagnosis of nosocomial bacterial pneumonia in intubated patients undergoing ventilation: comparison of the usefulness of bronchoalveolar lavage and the protected specimen brush.
Am J Med, 85 (1988), pp. 499-506
[15.]
N. Wimberley, L.J. Failing, J.G. Barlett.
A fiberoptic bronchoscopy technique to obtain uncontaminated lower airway secretion for bacterial culture.
Am Rev Respir Dis, 119 (1979), pp. 337-343
[16.]
A. Torres, A. Martos, J. Puig de la Bellacasa, M. Ferrer, M. El-Ebiary, J. González, et al.
Specificity of endotracheal aspiration, protected specimen brush and bronchoalveolar lavage in mechanically ventilated patients.
Am Rev Respir Dis, 147 (1993), pp. 952-957
[17.]
G.U. Meduri, R.C. Reddy, T. Stanley, F. El-Zeky.
Pneumonia in acute respiratory distress syndrome. A prospective evaluation of bilateral bronchoscopic sampling.
Am J Resp Crit Care Med, 158 (1998), pp. 870-875
[18.]
A. Torres, J. Puig de la Bellacasa, R. Rodríguez-Roisin, M.T. Jiménez de Anta, A. Agustí-Vidal.
Diagnostic value of telescoping plugged catheter in mechanically ventilated patients with bacterial pneumonia using the Métras catheter.
Am Rev Respir Dis, 138 (1988), pp. 117-120
[19.]
R. Jordá, F. Parras, J. Ibáñez, J. Reina, J. Bergada, J.M. Raurich.
Diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients by the blind protected telescoping catheter.
Intens Care Med, 19 (1993), pp. 377-382
[20.]
J. Pugin, R. Auckentaler, N. Mili, J.P. Janssens, P.D. Lew, P.M. Suter.
Diagnosis of ventilator.associated pneumonia by bacteriologic analysis of bronchoscopic and nonbronchoscopic “blind” bronchoalveolar lavage fluid.
Am Rev Respi Dis, 143 (1991), pp. 1121-1129
[21.]
J.J. Rouby, M.D. Rossignon, M.H. Nicolas, E. Martin Lassale, S. Cristin, J. Grosset, et al.
A prospective study of protected bronchoalveolar lavage in the diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonia.
Anesthesiology, 71 (1989), pp. 679-685
[22.]
N. Fabregas, A. Torres, M. El-Ebiary, J. Ramírez, C. Hernández, C. González, et al.
Histopathologic and microbiology aspects of ventilator- associated pneumonia.
Anesthesiology, 84 (1996), pp. 760-771
[23.]
C.H. Marquette, H. Georges, f. Wallet, P. Ramon, F. Saulnier, R. Neviere, et al.
Diagnostic efficiency of endotracheal aspirates with quantitative bacterial cultures in intubated patients with suspected pneumonia. Comparison with the protected specimen brush.
Am Rev Respir Dis, 148 (1993), pp. 138-144
[24.]
L. Papazian, C. Martin, J. Albanese, P. Saux, J. Charrel, F. Gouin.
Comparison of two methods of bacteriologic sampling of the lower respiratory tract: a study in ventilated patients with nosocomial bronchopneumonia.
Crit Care Med, 17 (1989), pp. 461-464
[25.]
J.M. Sánchez-nieto, A. Torres, F. García-Córdoba, M. El-Ebiary, A. Carrillo, J. Ruiz, et al.
Impact of invasive and noninvasive quantitative culture sampling on outcome of ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 57 (1998), pp. 371-376
[26.]
J. Solé Violán, J. Arroyo, A. Bordes, J. Cardeñosa, F. Rodríguez de Castro.
Impact of qualitative diagnostic techniques in the management and outcome of mechanically ventilated patients with suspected pneumonia.
Crit Care Med, 28 (2000), pp. 2737-2741
[27.]
M. Ruiz, A. Torres, S. Ewig, M.A. Marcos, A. Alcón, R. Lledó, et al.
Noninvasive versus invasive microbial investigation in ventilatorassociated pneumonia.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 162 (2000), pp. 119-125
[28.]
J.Y. Fagon, J. Chastre, M. Wolff, C. Gervais, S. Parer-Aubas, F. Stéphan, et al.
Invasive and noninvasive strategies for management of suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Ann Intern Med, 132 (2000), pp. 621-630

Otros miembros del Grupo de Estudio de la Neumonía Relacionada con la Ventilación Mecánica: M. El-Ebiary (Hospital Clínic, Barcelona); C. León, M. Guerrero y F. Ortega (Hospital Valme, Sevilla); F. Castillo (Hospital Duque del Infantado, Sevilla); R. Jordá (Hospital Son Dureta, Palma de Mallorca); J. Barado (Hospital de Navarra); J. Vallés y J. Rello (Hospital Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Barcelona); A. Santos Bouza (Hospital Conxo, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña)

Copyright © 2003. Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica
Archivos de Bronconeumología
Article options
Tools

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?