Journal Information
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Editorial
Full text access
Available online 31 December 2024
Screening Tackles the Big Three: The AGILE Alliance
Visits
219
David F. Yankelevitza,
Corresponding author
, Matthijs Oudkerkb,c, Claudia I. Henschkea
a Department of Diagnostic, Molecular, and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave Levy L. Place, New York, NY 10029, United States
b Institute for Diagnostic Accuracy, Groningen, Netherlands
c Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
This item has received
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Full Text

There is growing awareness of the potential of low-dose CT (LDCT) to screen for the three major causes of death in adults.1 These are heart disease, COPD, and lung cancer. Currently, there is acceptance of LDCT screening for lung cancer where the benefit was initially shown by a prospective cohort study in 1999 by the Early Lung Cancer Action Program (ELCAP)2 and subsequently confirmed by the results of two large, randomized trials, the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) and the Nederlands–Leuvens Longkanker Screenings Onderzoek (NELSON) trial as well as an international meta-analysis.3–5 National programs have been implemented in many countries around the world and others have begun pilot programs. European countries are developing lung cancer screening practice at the population level following the Institutional endorsement by the Europe's Beating Cancer Plan.6 On the other hand, the European population favors receiving a comprehensive health check that includes diffuse bronchopulmonary disease and cardiovascular risk.7 Coronary artery calcification (CAC) scoring has been gaining acceptance as a screening tool and included in guidelines by the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC)8 in the United States and by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)9 for people with intermediate risk. While evidence accumulates regarding benefits associated with this test, results from ROBINSCA, a European RCT are awaited before firmer recommendations can be made.10 Regarding COPD, according to the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), there is no evidence of benefit in screening for COPD receiving a “D” recommendation. This means that, “The USPSTF found at least fair evidence that [the service] is ineffective or that harms outweigh benefits”.11 However, the USPSTF has not yet evaluated the benefit of screening for emphysema with thoracic CT in a tobacco-exposed cohort. For purposes of this editorial, screening for lung cancer, emphysema and coronary artery disease will be referred to as screening for, “The Big Three.”

There are growing numbers of countries with guideline recommendations for LDCT screening for lung cancer, some with governmental coverage.12 CAC screening, while included in guidelines in many countries, is not formally covered by insurance except in limited circumstances.13 Currently, there are no countries which recommend COPD screening. However, in the context of real-world LDCT lung cancer screening, there is no consensus whether to share information provided by LDCT about emphysema and cardiac findings. In fact, in many countries there is concern regarding whether the full radiological information available from a chest CT should even be reported. With the ever increasing availability of large databases and advances in artificial intelligence, these concerns take on increased urgency as the capability to make additional predictions, even beyond the Big Three finding will raise many ethical issues.14

In the United States, CAC scores and even emphysema scores are routinely reported in the context of LDCT lung cancer screening, typically in semi-quantitative terms by visual scoring,15,16 although there is no additional reimbursement for these findings. In some countries, they are specifically not reported and only lung screening results are described. Considerations regarding reporting findings beyond what the test was initially meant to evaluate has been a long simmering controversy.

In the setting of lung cancer screening, the two additional frequently lethal conditions, emphysema and coronary artery disease which have overlapping risk factors with lung cancer can be readily evaluated. This additional radiological information is available without additional radiation dose, no additional scanner time, and no additional time imposition on the screening participant. The only question is how it should actually be reported. In the United States under a recent legislation (21st Century Cures Act) all such diagnostic information stored in the electronic medical record has to be discussed with the person undergoing the medical test.17 Regarding emphysema, this topic has recently been reviewed, and two studies of large screening populations demonstrated that the majority of screening participants found to have emphysema were unaware that they have the disease.18,19 Emphysema is not reversible and there is no suggested treatment, especially in asymptomatic subjects. Yet, emphysema represents a biomarker of susceptibility to lung damage, therefore it can contribute to prognostic stratification (including risk of lung cancer as well as respiratory morbidity). For this reason, the authors here, strongly advocate for a conversation with the person having the LDCT and to discuss the diagnosis and outline potential preventive interventions including enhanced smoking cessation or increased physical activity.

It is for these concerns that two large lung cancer screening consortiums in the United States (I-ELCAP) and Europe (I-DNA) decided to collaborate to forge a new organization, the Alliance for Global Implementation of Lung and Cardiac Early disease Detection and Treatment (AGILEDXRX) with the following mission statement:

The early detection of lung cancer using thoracic CT has been widely demonstrated in multiple international trials to objectively increase cure rates. Now the international focus is on effective and economical implementation. Increasingly, it is emerging that thoracic CT screening is also detecting a range of early tobacco-related diseases including cardiovascular disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. These three diseases comprise the ‘BIG3’, as they collectively account for close to half of the premature deaths globally. Thoracic CT screening presents a unique opportunity to integrate care for this high risk cohort with a single imaging examination. We plan to develop optimized protocols for evaluation of these major diseases, explore challenges and define solutions in enabling implementation, especially for economically disadvantaged countries across the world. A core strategy in achieving this ambitious goal is to leverage the use of AI processes across the continuum of care, including its use for risk assessment, disease detection and managing disease interventions.

AGILE held its first meeting on May 9–11, 2024 at the Universidad de Navarra in Madrid, Spain. Its next meeting will be held on April 3–5th, 2025 at the Princess Srisavangavadhana College of Medicine in Bangkok, Thailand.20 The meetings primarily focus on integration of the Big Three major illnesses with a view towards comprehensive evaluation both from an imaging standpoint as well as clinically. The critical role of imaging is foremost in these meeting with a special interest on image quality and its impact. In addition, the meetings take a more holistic approach regarding the information that is available in these images, even beyond the Big Three, such as osteoporosis, abnormal adiposity, steatosis, and muscle mass and quality. Finally, the meetings recognize the critical role of therapeutics, and the need to consider this as inseparable from screening, meaning that the screening process does not end at early diagnosis, but rather, needs to consider therapeutic options and their usefulness as preventive measures as well. The meeting also includes case review sessions both for diagnostics and therapeutics with a view towards bringing out cutting edge concerns where there are differences of opinions in how to proceed among experts.

Finally, the meeting is meant to foster collaborative work with inputs on a global scale to develop independent recommendations for scanning and management protocols and even considerations for how to further integrate imaging findings into therapeutic considerations. Collaborations with existing organizations will be pursued and meetings will be available at no charge on Zoom with recordings available afterwards as well.

Funding

None declared.

Conflict of Interests

Dr. Yankelevitz is a named inventor on a number of patents and patent applications related to the evaluation of chest diseases including measurements of chest nodules. Dr. Yankelevitz has received financial compensation for the licensing of these patents. In addition, he is a consultant and co-owner of Accumetra, a private company developing tools to improve the quality of CT imaging. He is on the advisory board and owns equity in HeartLung, a company that develops software related to CT scans of the chest. He is on the medical advisory board of Median Technology that is developing technology related to analyzing pulmonary nodules and is on the medical advisory board of Carestream, a company that develops radiography equipment. He is also on the advisory board for LungLife AI.

Dr. Claudia Henschke is a named inventor on a number of patents and patent applications relating to the evaluation of pulmonary nodules on CT scans of the chest which are owned by Cornell Research Foundation (CRF). Since 2009, Dr. Henschke does not accept any financial benefit from these patents including royalties and any other proceeds related to the patents or patent applications owned by CRF. Dr. Henschke is the President and serve on the board of the Early Diagnosis and Treatment Research Foundation. She receives no compensation from the Foundation. The Foundation is established to provide grants for projects, conferences, and public databases for research on early diagnosis and treatment of diseases. Recipients include, I-ELCAP, among others. The funding comes from a variety of sources including philanthropic donations, grants and contracts with agencies (federal and non-federal), imaging and pharmaceutical companies relating to image processing assessments. The various sources of funding exclude any funding from tobacco companies or tobacco-related sources. Dr. Claudia Henschke is on the advisory board of LungLife AI without compensation.

Dr. Oudkerk received EU Horizon 2020 funding.

References
[1]
M.A. Heuvelmans, M. Vonder, M. Rook, H.J.M. Groen, G.H. De Bock, X. Xie, et al.
Screening for early lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cardiovascular disease (the Big-3) using low-dose chest computed tomography: current evidence and technical considerations.
J Thorac Imaging, 34 (2019), pp. 160-169
[2]
C.I. Henschke, D.I. McCauley, D.F. Yankelevitz, D.P. Naidich, G. McGuinness, O.S. Miettinen, et al.
Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening.
[3]
National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, D.R. Aberle, A.M. Adams, C.D. Berg, W.C. Black, J.D. Clapp, et al.
Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening.
N Engl J Med, 365 (2011), pp. 395-409
[4]
H.J. de Koning, C.M. van der Aalst, P.A. de Jong, E.T. Scholten, K. Nackaerts, M.A. Heuvelmans, et al.
Reduced lung-cancer mortality with volume CT screening in a randomized trial.
N Engl J Med, 382 (2020), pp. 503-513
[5]
A. Bonney, R. Malouf, C. Marchal, D. Manners, K.M. Fong, H.M. Marshall, et al.
Impact of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening on lung cancer-related mortality.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 8 (2022),
[6]
European Commission. Europe's Beating Cancer Plan. Communication from the commission to the European Parliament and the Council. Available from: https://health.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2022-02/eu_cancer-plan_en_0.pdf [accessed 30.10.24].
[7]
C. Behr, H. Koffijberg, M. IJzerman, H.U. Kauczor, M.P. Revel, M. Silva, et al.
Willingness to participate in combination screening for lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cardiovascular disease in four European countries.
Eur Radiol, 34 (2024), pp. 4448-4456
[8]
J. Taron, A. Lyass, T.F. Mahoney, R.Q. Ehrbar, R.S. Vasan, R.B. D’Agostino Sr., et al.
Coronary artery calcium score-directed primary prevention with statins on the basis of the 2018 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Multisociety Cholesterol Guidelines.
J Am Heart Assoc, 10 (2021),
[9]
F.L.J. Visseren, F. Mach, Y.M. Smulders, D. Carballo, K.C. Koskinas, M. Bäck, et al.
2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice.
Eur J Prev Cardiol, 29 (2022), pp. 5-115
[10]
M. Vonder, C.M. van der Aalst, R. Vliegenthart, P.M.A. van Ooijen, D. Kuijpers, J.W. Gratama, et al.
Coronary artery calcium imaging in the ROBINSCA Trial: rationale, design, and technical background.
Acad Radiol, 25 (2018), pp. 118-128
[11]
US Preventive Services Task Force, C.M. Mangione, M.J. Barry, W.K. Nicholson, M. Cabana, A.B. Caughey, et al.
Screening for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: US Preventive Services Task Force Reaffirmation Recommendation Statement.
JAMA, 327 (2022), pp. 1806-1811
[12]
Lung Cancer Policy Network. Available from: https://www.lungcancerpolicynetwork.com [accessed 28.10.24].
[13]
M. Naghavi, D.J. Maron, R.A. Kloner, D.S. Berman, M. Budoff, H.R. Superko, et al.
Coronary artery calcium testing: a call for universal coverage.
Prev Med Rep, 15 (2019), pp. 100879
[14]
A.P. Brady, E. Neri.
Artificial intelligence in radiology – ethical considerations.
Diagnostics (Basel), 10 (2020), pp. 231
[15]
D.A. Lynch, J.H. Austin, J.C. Hogg, P.A. Grenier, H.U. Kauczor, A.A. Bankier, et al.
CT-definable subtypes of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a statement of the Fleischner Society.
Radiology, 277 (2015), pp. 192-205
[16]
J. Shemesh, C.I. Henschke, D. Shaham, R. Yip, A.O. Farooqi, M.D. Cham, et al.
Ordinal scoring of coronary artery calcifications on low-dose CT scans of the chest is predictive of death from cardiovascular disease.
Radiology, 257 (2010), pp. 541-548
[17]
21st Century Cures Act. Available from: https://www.congress.gov/114/plaws/publ255/PLAW-114publ255.pdf [accessed 28.10.24].
[18]
D. Steiger, M.F. Siddiqi, R. Yip, D.F. Yankelevitz, C.I. Henschke, I-ELCAP Investigators.
The importance of low-dose CT screening to identify emphysema in asymptomatic participants with and without a prior diagnosis of COPD.
Clin Imaging, 78 (2021), pp. 136-141
[19]
P.F. Pinsky, D.A. Lynch, D.S. Gierada.
Incidental findings on low-dose CT scan lung cancer screenings and deaths from respiratory diseases.
Chest, 161 (2022), pp. 1092-1100
[20]
IELCAP Conferences. Available from: https://www.ielcap.org/home/ielcap/events [accessed 28.10.24].
Copyright © 2024. SEPAR
Archivos de Bronconeumología
Article options
Tools

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?