Journal Information
Full text access
Pre-proof, online 19 November 2025
Prevalence And Prognostic Relevance Of Central Pulmonary Embolism: Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis
Winnifer Briceño1,a, Juan Manuel Velasco1,a, Ana Castillo1, Ignacio Jara1, Laura Lago1, Edwin Yong1, Gema Díaz2, Gregory Piazza3, Behnood Bikdeli3,4,5, David Jiménez1,6,7,
Corresponding author
djimenez.hrc@gmail.com

Correspondence: Respiratory Department and Medicine Department, Ramón y Cajal Hospital, Universidad de Alcalá IRYCIS, 28034 Madrid, Spain
1 Respiratory Department, Ramón y Cajal Hospital (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain
2 Respiratory Department, Hospital Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain
3 Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
4 Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
5 Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, USA
6 Medicine Department, Universidad de Alcalá (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain
7 CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain
Article information
Abstract

Background: In patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE), embolic burden has an uncertain prognostic significance.

Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of studies including patients with PE to assess the prevalence and prognostic relevance of central PE (i.e., saddle or main pulmonary emboli) for short-term death and other adverse outcome events. A random-effects model was used to pool study results, and I2 testing was used to test for heterogeneity.

Results: Data from 28 studies (205,877 patients) were included in the analysis. Of the 26 studies with 205,410 participants that enrolled consecutive patients with PE, 7,748 (3.8%) had central PE. Though there was no statistically significant difference between central and noncentral PE for odds of short-term all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91 to 1.55), central PE had a significant association with short-term PE-related deterioration or death (OR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.44 to 4.25). Results from 9 studies with 4,325 PE patients that had available data showed that central PE had a significant association with the odds of short-term PE-related mortality (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.22-2.55). Results were consistent for prospective (OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.21 to 2.32), and studies that only enrolled stable patients (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.92).

Conclusions: Central PE was an uncommon finding in unselected patients diagnosed with PE. While central thrombus did not have an association with increased risk of all-cause mortality, it was significantly associated with an increased risk of PE-related deterioration and death short after diagnosis.

Keywords:
Pulmonary embolism
prognosis
mortality
central
saddle
meta-analysis
Full text is only available in PDF

Both authors contributed equally to the manuscript

Copyright © 2025. SEPAR
Archivos de Bronconeumología
Article options
Tools