Journal Information
Vol. 39. Issue 8.
Pages 341-345 (August 2003)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 39. Issue 8.
Pages 341-345 (August 2003)
Full text access
Estudio multicéntrico, prospectivo, de comparación del tratamiento de la tromboembolia pulmonar submasiva con enoxaparina y heparina no fraccionada
Multicenter, prospective study comparing enoxaparin with unfractionated heparin in the treatment of submassive pulmonary thromboembolism
Visits
8337
L.A. Pérez de Llanoa,
, A. Baloira Villarb, A. Veres Racamondea, F. Veigac, R. Golpe Gómezd, F. Pajuelo Fernándeze
a Sección de Neumología. Hospital Xeral-Calde. Lugo. España
b Sección de Neumología. Complejo Hospitalario de Pontevedra. Pontevedra. España
c Servicio de Geriatría. Hospital Xeral-Calde. Lugo. España
d Unidad de Neumología. Hospital Comarcal de Monforte. Lugo. España
e Dirección científica. Aventis Pharma. Madrid. España
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Objetivo

Evaluar la eficacia y seguridad del tratamiento de la tromboembolia pulmonar submasiva (TEP) con enoxaparina en comparación con heparina no fraccionada

Pacientes Y Métodos

Se incluyó en el estudio, de forma prospectiva, a 56 pacientes con TEP que no precisaron tratamiento fibrinolítico. Se asignaron de forma aleatoria a dos grupos de tratamiento: el grupo A, que recibió enoxaprina (1 mg/kg cada 12 h) y el grupo B, al que se le administraron dosis ajustadas de heparina no fraccionada. La anticoagulación oral se inició una vez que el diagnóstico se comprobó y se mantuvo durante 6 meses. Se evaluó la incidencia de recurrencia tromboembólica y de hemorragia mayor al cabo de ese tiempo

Resultados

Seis pacientes fueron excluidos del estudio. De los 50 finalmente incluidos, 29 fueron asignados al grupo A (enoxaparina) y 21 al grupo B (heparina no fraccionada). Tres pacientes del grupo A (10,7%) fueron diagnosticados de recurrencia tromboembólica, mientras que dicha complicación se constató en dos pacientes del grupo B (9,5%). No se encontraron diferencias significativas. Dos pacientes fallecieron, siendo una de las muertes achacada a hemorragia secundaria a la anticoagulación oral (grupo A) y la otra a un proceso independiente a la enfermedad tromboembólica

Conclusiones

El empleo de enoxaparina en el tratamiento inicial del TEP parece ser tan efectivo y seguro como el uso de heparina no fraccionada

Palabras clave:
Tromboembolia pulmonar
Heparina no fraccionada
Heparina de bajo peso molecular
Enoxaparina
Objective

To compare the safety and efficacy of enoxaparin and unfractionated heparin in the treatment of submassive pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE)

Material And Methods

Fifty-six patients with PTE who did not need fibrinolytic treatment were enrolled prospectively. The patients were randomly assigned to 2 treatment groups: Group A received enoxaparin (1mg/kg every 12 hours) and Group B received adjusted doses of unfractionated heparin. The oral anticoagulant therapy was started on confirmation of the diagnosis and continued for 6 months. Incidences of recurrence of thromboembolism and of severe bleeding were assessed at the end of this period

Results

Six patients were withdrawn from the study. Twenty-nine of the 50 remaining patients were in Group A (enoxaparin) and 21 in Group B (unfractionated heparin). A recurrence of thromboembolism was diagnosed in 3 patients from Group A (10.7%) and 2 patients from Group B (9.5%). There were no significant differences. Two patients died, one death being attributed to bleeding secondary to the oral anticoagulant treatment (Group A) and the other to a process unrelated to PTE

Conclusions

Enoxaparin seems to be as effective and safe as unfractionated heparin in the initial treatment of PTE

Key words:
Pulmonary thromboembolism
Heparin
unfractionated
Low molecular weight
Enoxaparin
Full text is only aviable in PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
R.D. Hull, G.F. Pineo, G.E. Raskob.
The economic impact of treating deep vein thrombosis with low-molecular-weight heparin: outcome of therapy and health economy aspects. low-molecular-weight heparin versus unfractionated heparin.
Haemostasis, 28 (1998), pp. 8-16
[2.]
M.K. Gould, A.D. Dembitzer, R.L. Doyle, T.J. Hastie, A.M. Garber.
Low-molecular-weight heparins compared with unfractionated heparin for treatment of acute deep venous thrombosis. A metaanalysis of randomized, controlled trials.
Ann Intern Med, 130 (1999), pp. 800-809
[3.]
C. Thery, G. Simonneau, G. Meyer, O. Helenon, F. Bridey, C. Armagnac, et al.
Randomized trial of subcutaneous low-molecular- weight heparin CY 216 (fraxiparine) compared with intravenous unfractionated heparin in the curative treatment of submassive pulmonary embolism. A dose-ranging study.
Circulation, 85 (1992), pp. 1380-1389
[4.]
G. Meyer, F. Brenot, G. Pacouret, G. Simonneau, K. Gillet Juvin, B. Charbonnier, et al.
Subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin fragmin versus intravenous unfractionated heparin in the treatment of acute non massive pulmonary embolism: an open randomized pilot study.
Thromb Haemost, 74 (1995), pp. 1432-1435
[5.]
Investigators The Columbus.
Low-molecular-weight heparin in the treatment of patients with venous thromboembolism.
N Engl J Med, 337 (1997), pp. 657-662
[6.]
G. Simonneau, H. Sors, B. Charbonnier, Y. Page, J.P. Laaban, R. Azarian, et al.
A comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin with unfractionated heparin for acute pulmonary embolism. The THESEE Study Group.
Tinzaparine ou Heparine Standard: Evaluations dans l'Embolie Pulmonaire. N Engl J Med, 337 (1997), pp. 663-669
[7.]
R.D. Hull, G.E. Raskob, R.F. Brant, G.F. Pineo, G. Elliott, P.D. Stein, et al.
Low-molecular-weight heparin vs heparin in the treatment of patients with pulmonary embolism. American-Canadian Thrombosis Study Group.
Arch Intern Med, 160 (2000), pp. 229-236
[8.]
M.J. Kovacs, D. Anderson, B. Morrow, L. Gray, D. Touchie, P.S. Wells.
Outpatient treatment of pulmonary embolism with dalteparin.
Thromb Haemost, 83 (2000), pp. 209-211
[9.]
J.F. Van der Heijden, M.H. Prins, H.R. Buller.
Low-molecular-weight heparins: are they interchangeable?.
Haemostasis, 30 (2000), pp. 148-157
[10.]
M. Monreal Bosch.
Tratamiento del embolismo pulmonar submasivo de bajo peso molecular.
Med Clin (Barc), 115 (2000), pp. 943-946
[11.]
The PIOPED Investigators.
Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. Results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED).
Jama, 263 (1990), pp. 2753-2759
[12.]
P.D. Stein, H. Huang, A. Afzal, H.A. Noor.
Incidence of acute pulmonary embolism in a general hospital: relation to age, sex, and race.
Chest, 116 (1999), pp. 909-913
[13.]
S. Schulman, A.S. Rhedin, P. Lindmarker, A. Carlsson, G. Larfars, P. Nicol, et al.
A comparison of six weeks with six months of oral anticoagulant therapy after a first episode of venous thromboembolism. Duration of Anticoagulation Trial Study Group.
N Engl J Med, 332 (1995), pp. 1661-1665
[14.]
L. Pinede, P. Duhaut, M. Cucherat, J. Ninet, J. Pasquier, J.P. Boissel.
Comparison of long versus short duration anticoagulant therapy after a first episode of venous thromboembolism: a meta-analysis of randomised, controlled trials.
J Intern Med, 247 (2000), pp. 553-556
[15.]
P. Prandoni, A.W. Lensing, A. Cogo, S. Cuppini, S. Villalta, M. Carta, et al.
The long-term clinical course of acute deep venous thrombosis.
Ann Intern Med, 125 (1996), pp. 1-7
[16.]
J.A. Heit, M.D. Silverstein, D.N. Mohr, T.M. Petterson, W.M. O'Fallon, I.I.I. Melton LJ.
Risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population-based case-control study.
Arch Intern Med, 160 (2000), pp. 809-815
Copyright © 2003. Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica
Archivos de Bronconeumología
Article options
Tools

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?