Journal Information
Vol. 30. Issue 8.
Pages 381-384 (October 1994)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 30. Issue 8.
Pages 381-384 (October 1994)
Full text access
Diagnóstico gammagráfico del tromboembolismo pulmonar agudo
Scintigraphic evaluation for diagnosis of acule pulmonary thromboembolism
Visits
12366
A. Capelastegui, M. Oribe1, C. Esteban
Servicio de Neumología. Hospital de Galdakao. Vizcaya
V. Llorens*, J.L. Miguélez**, A. Marco**
* Servicio de Medicina Nuclear. Hospital de Cruces. Vizcaya
** Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico. Hospital de Galdakao. Vizcaya
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics

Hemos querido conocer nuestra prevalencia de tromboembolismo pulmonar agudo (TEP), así como establecer la confianza diagnóstica de la gammagrafía pulmonar (GG) y la influencia del contexto clínico (CC). Para ello hemos realizado un estudio prospectivo durante 2 años, exigiendo para el diagnóstico la arteriografía pulmonar o la GG de perfusión normal. Sobre un total de 97 pacientes, 73 (75%) han sido diagnosticados de TEP. En el grupo de 58 pacientes con GG de ventilación/perfusión (V/Q) 33 casos tenían un test de “alta probabilidad”, de ellos 32 con TEP (sensibilidad 88%, especificidad 94%). Si combinamos la GG de V/Q de “alta probabilidad” con un CC de “alta sospecha” obtenemos una sensibilidad del 51% y una especificidad del 100%. Hay un grupo de pacientes (28) con más edad y con mayor grado de disnea y taquipnea que no fueron capaces de realizar la GG de ventilación. De los 21 pacientes con GG de “alta probabilidad”, 19 casos tenían TEP (sensibilidad 86%, especificidad 85%). Si combinamos el test GG de “alta probabilidad” con un CC de “alta sospecha” tenemos una sensibilidad del 32% y una especificidad del 100%. La GG de perfusión normal excluye el TEP clínicamente relevante. Los resultados GG de “intermedia o baja” probabilidad, incluso si lo combinamos con el CC, no tienen validez diagnóstica.

We aimed to determine the prevalence of acute pulmonary embolism (APE) in our population and to establish the diagnostic reliability of pulmonary scintigraphy (PS), as well as the influence of the clinical context (CC). During a 2-year prospective study, patients were diagnosed by either pulmonary angiography or normal-perfusion PS. A diagnosis of APE was made in 73 (75%) of a total of 97 patients. In the group of 58 patients diagnosed by ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) PS, 33 were classified as “highly probably” having APE; 32 of these in fací had the syndrome (sensitivity 88%, specificity 94%). Combining the “highly probable” patients with the “highly suspected” patients diagnosed by ventilation/perfusion PS, we obtained a sensitivity of 51% and specificity of 100%. Ventilation scintigrams were unobtainable in 28 older patients with greater dyspnea and tachypnea, who were unable to perform the maneuvers. Of the 21 “highly probable” patients as assessed by PS, 19 were diagnosed as having APE (sensitivity 86%, specificity 85%). Combining the “highly probable” patients with the “highly suspected” group, we obtained a sensitivity of 32% and specificity of 100%. Normal perfusion PS exeludes clinically relevant APE. “Intermedíate” or “slight” probability PS results, even when combined with CC, have no diagnostic validity.

Full text is only aviable in PDF
Bibliografía
[1.]
W.R. Bell.
Pulmonary Embolism.
Advances and Problems. Am J Med, 72 (1982), pp. 181-183
[2.]
A. Collado, J. Villalta, J.A. Bambi, M. Ingelmo.
Valor diagnóstico y pronóstico de los factores asociados al tromboembolismo pulmonar.
Estudio de 70 casos autopsiados. Med Clin, 86 (1986), pp. 265-267
[3.]
E.C. Rosenow, P.J. Osmundson, M.L. Brown.
Pulmonary embolism.
Mayo Clin Proc, 56 (1981), pp. 161-178
[4.]
D.E. Lilienfeld, E. Chan, J. Ehland, J.H. Godbold, P.J. Landrigan, G. Marsh.
Mortality from pulmonary embolism in the United States: 1962 to 1984.
Chest, 98 (1990), pp. 1.067-1.072
[5.]
The, PIOPED., Investigators.
Value of the ventilation/perfusión scan in acute pulmonary embolism: Results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED).
Jama, 263 (1990), pp. 2.753-2.759
[6.]
R.D. Hull, J. Hirsh, C.J. Carter, R.M. Jay, P.E. Dodd, P.A. Ockelford, et al.
Pulmonary angiography, ventilation lung scanning, and venography for clinically suspected pulmonary embolism with abnormal perfusion lung scan.
Ann Intern Med, 98 (1983), pp. 891-899
[7.]
R.D. Hull, J. Hirsh, C.J. Carter, G.E. Raskob, G.J. Gill, R.M. Jay, et al.
Diagnostic value of ventilation/perfusion lung scanning in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.
Chest, 88 (1985), pp. 819-828
[8.]
R.D. Hull, G.E. Raskob.
Low probability lung sean findings: a need for change.
Ann Intern Med, 114 (1991), pp. 142-143
[9.]
D.R. Biello.
Radiological scintígraphic evaluation of patients with suspected pulmonary thromboembolism.
Jama, 257 (1987), pp. 3.257-3.259
[10.]
J.E. Dalen, H.L. Brooks, L.W. Johnson, S.G. Meister, M.M. Szucs, L. Dexter.
Pulmonary angiography in acute pulmonary embolism: Indications, techniques and results in 367 patients.
Am Heart J, 81 (1971), pp. 175-185
[11.]
G.A.H. Miller, G.C. Sutton, I.H. Kerr, R.V. Gibson, M. Honey.
Comparison of streptokinase and heparin in treatment of isolated acute massive pulmonary embolism.
Br Med J, 2 (1971), pp. 681-684
[12.]
B.J. McNeil.
A diagnostic strategy using ventilation/perfusion studies in patients suspect for pulmonary embolism.
J Nucí Med, 17 (1976), pp. 613-616
[13.]
R. Cheely, N.H. McCartney, J.R. Perry, D.J. Delany, L. Bustad, et al.
The role of noninvasive tests versus pulmonary angiography in the diagnostic of pulmonary embolism.
Am J Med, 70 (1981), pp. 17-22
[14.]
P.O. Alderson, N. Rujanajech, R.H. Secker-Walker, R.C. McKnight.
The role of l33xe ventilation studies in the scintigraphic detection of pulmonary embolism.
Radiology, 120 (1976), pp. 633-640
[15.]
B.J. McNeil.
Ventilation/perfusion studies and the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: concise communication.
J Nucl Med, 21 (1980), pp. 319-323
[16.]
G. Denardo, D.A. Goodwin, R. Ravasini, P.A. Dietrich.
The ventilatory loung scan in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.
N Engl J Med, 282 (1970), pp. 1.334-1.336
[17.]
D.R. Biello, A.G. Mattar, R.C. McKnight, B.A. Siegel.
Ventilation/perfusion studies in suspected pulmonary embolism.
Am J Rev, 133 (1979), pp. 1.033-1.037
[18.]
P.D. Stein, M.L. Terrin, A. Gottschalk, A. Alavi, J.W. Henry.
Value of ventilation/perfusion scans versus perfusión sean alone in acute pulmonary embolism.
Am J Cardiol, 69 (1992), pp. 1.234-1.241
[19.]
R.D. Hull, G.E. Raskob, G. Coates, A.A. Panju.
Clinical validity of a normal perfusion lung scan in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.
Chest, 97 (1990), pp. 23-26
[20.]
R.A. Novelline, O.H. Baitarowich, C.A. Athanasoulis, A.C. Waltman, A.J. Greenfield, K.A. McKusick.
The clinical course of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism and a negative pulmonary arteriogram.
Radiology, 126 (1978), pp. 561-567
[21.]
M.S. Kipper, K.M. Moser, K.E. Kortman, W.L. Ashburn.
Long-term follow-up of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism and a normal lung sean.
Chest, 82 (1982), pp. 411-415
Copyright © 1994. Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica
Archivos de Bronconeumología
Article options
Tools

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?