Journal Information
Vol. 47. Issue 4.
Pages 213 (January 2011)
Vol. 47. Issue 4.
Pages 213 (January 2011)
Letters to the Editor
Full text access
Which Data Base Should we Use for our Literature Analysis? Web of Science versus SCOPUS
¿Qué base de datos debemos emplear para nuestros análisis bibliográficos? Web of Science versus SCOPUS
Visits
5363
This item has received
Article information
Full text is only aviable in PDF
References
[1.]
Burham JF. Scopus database. A review. Biomedical Digital Libraries. 2006;3:1 [accessed 2010 Sept 20]. Available from: http://www.bio-diglib.com/content/pdf/1742-5581-3-1.pdf
[2.]
Bakkalbas N, Baver K, Glover J, Wang L. Three options for citation tracking: Google, Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science. BMC Biomedical Digital Libraries. 2006;3:7 [accesed 2010 Sept 20]. Available from: http://archive.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1742-5581-3-7.pdf
[3.]
C. López Illescas, F. Moya-Anegón, H.F. Moed.
Coverage and citation impact of oncological journals in the Web of Science and Scopus.
Journal of Informetrics, 2 (2008), pp. 304-316
[4.]
C. López Illescas, F. Moya Anegón, H.F. Moed.
Comparing bibliometric country-by-country rankings derived from the Web of Science and Scopus: the effect of poorly cited journal in oncology.
Journal of Information Science, 35 (2009), pp. 244-256
[5.]
A.V. Kulkarni, B. Aziz, I. Shams, J.W. Busse.
Comparisons of citation in Web of Science, Scopus and GoogleScholar for articles published in general medical journals.
JAMA, 302 (2009), pp. 1092-1096
[6.]
M.I. Escalona Fernández, P. Lagar Barbosa, A. Pulgarín Guerrero.
Web of Science Vs. Scopus: un estudio cuantitativo en ingeniería química.
Anales de Documentación, 13 (2010), pp. 159-175
Copyright © 2011. Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica