Journal Information
Vol. 58. Issue 5.
Pages T448-T450 (May 2022)
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 58. Issue 5.
Pages T448-T450 (May 2022)
Scientific Letter
Full text access
[Translated article] Tuberculosis contacts tracing in Spain: Cost analysis
Estudio de contactos de pacientes con tuberculosis en España: analisis de costes
José Antonio Gullón-Blancoa,b,
Corresponding author

Corresponding author.
, Teresa Rodrigo-Sanzb, Eva Tabernero-Huguetb,c, Josefina Sabría-Mestresb,d, Luis Anibarrob,e, Manuel-Ángel Villanueva-Montesa,b, Isabel Mir-Viladrichb,f, Juan-Diego Álvarez-Mavarezg, José-María García-Garcíab, Grupo de trabajo del Programa Integrado de Investigación en Tuberculosis (PII-TB) 1
a Unidad de Gestión Clínica Neumología, Hospital Universitario San Agustín, Avilés, Spain
b Programa Integrado de Investigación en Tuberculosis (PII-TB) SEPAR, Barcelona, Spain
c Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario de Cruces, Baracaldo, Spain
d Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Moisés Broggi, Sant Joan Despí, Spain
e Servicio de Medicina Interna, Complexo Hospitalario de Pontevedra, Pontevedra, Spain
f Sección de Neumología, Hospital Son Llatzer, Palma De Mallorca, Spain
g Sección de Neumología, Hospital Carmen y Severo Ochoa, Cangas del Narcea, Spain
Related content
Arch Bronconeumol. 2022;58:448-5010.1016/j.arbres.2021.09.016
José Antonio Gullón-Blanco, Teresa Rodrigo-Sanz, Eva Tabernero-Huguet, Josefina Sabría-Mestres, Luis Anibarro, Manuel-Ángel Villanueva-Montes, Isabel Mir-Viladrich, Juan-Diego Álvarez-Mavarez, José-María García-García
Article information
Full Text
Download PDF
Tables (2)
Table 1. Indirect costs.
Table 2. Cost-effectiveness of the diagnostic strategy and latent tuberculous infection treatment.
Show moreShow less
Full Text
To the Director,

Contacts tracing of tuberculosis (TB) patients involves significant health expenditure, but while several studies have analyzed the cost of diagnosis or treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI)1, few have evaluated cost of the overall process2. Furthermore, the most appropriate diagnostic method for LTI is still under debate3.

We therefore designed this prospective observational study to determine the cost of TB contacts tracing and to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of the diagnostic methods and treatment of LTBI.

Contacts of patients diagnosed with TB between January 2018 and December 2019 were included in the National SEPAR Registry of the Integrated Tuberculosis Research Program (PII-TB) database. Research group members were given a username and password to access the registry. Twelve centers from 6 Spanish autonomous communities participated, and the study was approved by all corresponding Ethics and Research Committees.

The following definitions were established:

Index case: case recognized as the source of the infection of other patients and/or infected cases4.

Secondary case: a contact diagnosed with TB.

Contact: person with exposure to the index case4.

Latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI): tuberculin skin test (TST) with induration diameter of at least 5 mm and/or positive QuantiFERON TB Gold (QFT) with a cut-off of 0.35 IU/mL5, and no evidence of active disease.

Diagnostic strategy: techniques used to diagnose LTBI, according to the sequence established at the discretion of the attending physician. Three options were considered: dual (TST plus QFT combined); TST alone; or QFT alone.

Direct costs were extracted from the data provided by the Health Service of the Principality of Asturias6 and the Catalan Public Health Agency7, as shown in Table 1. Indirect costs for the treatment and follow-up of active TB cases detected in the contact study were Є10,262 per patient8. Using these data, we performed a cost-effectiveness analysis of the diagnostic strategy and LTBI treatment. Baseline strategies selected for diagnosis and treatment were TST and a 6-month course of isoniazid (6H), respectively, and the target population consisted of all contacts of the 4832 TB cases diagnosed in Spain in 20189, estimating that each of them would have an average of 4 contacts. The number of TB cases avoided was used as a measure of efficacy, assuming that 10% of infected contacts will develop TB during their lifetime10, and that LTBI treatment reduces the overall risk by between 56% and 75%, depending on the regimen used11. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated to compare the different strategies. When a strategy was less expensive and more effective than the baseline strategy, the ICER was not calculated and that strategy was considered dominant.

Table 1.

Indirect costs.

Variable  Cost (Є) 
Medical consultations
Initial  120.30 
Subsequent  72.20 
Blood tests (blood count, biochemistry with liver function tests)  23.48 
Sputum smear and sputum culture  19.66 
Plain chest X-ray  9.51 
Tuberculin skin test  15 
QuantiFERON TB Gold  125 
LTBI treatment  Cost (Є) per patient 
Isoniazid for 6 months  18.72 
Isoniazid plus rifampicin for 3 months  71.52 
Rifampicin for 4 months  83.71 
Isoniazid for 9 months  28.08 

LTBI: latent tuberculosis infection.

Proportions were compared using the Student’s t-test or its non-parametric equivalent, the Mann-Whitney U test A p-value of less than .05 was considered significant.

A total of 1035 contacts of 265 index cases with a mean age of 37.96 ± 20.13 years were identified. The diagnostic strategy was dual in 374 (36.4%), TST in 537 (51.9%), and QFT in 124 (11.7%); the percentage of LTBI in each group was 48.2%, 27.4%, and 40.4%, respectively (P = .01). LTBI was diagnosed in 346 (33.4%) contacts and 295 started treatment: 156 (52.9%) received isoniazid plus rifampicin for 3 months (3HR), 124 (42%) received 6H, 5 (1.9%) received rifampicin for 4 months (4R), and 10 (3.2%) received isoniazid for 9 months; 91.1%, 89.1%, 80%, and 70% completed treatment, respectively (P = .1). Seventeen cases of TB were diagnosed (1.6%).

The total cost was Є545,491.80: Є371,037.80 for direct costs, of which 40.8% was for medical consultations, 26.1% for LTBI treament, and 25.1% for diagnostic studies. The average cost per contact studied was Є548.23 (SD 142.97). Dual and QFT strategies were significantly more expensive than TST but more effective, and the 3HR treatment was dominant over 6H. The costs of diagnosis and LTBI treatment and corresponding ICERs are shown in Table 2.

Table 2.

Cost-effectiveness of the diagnostic strategy and latent tuberculous infection treatment.

  Mean cost (per contact) Є  Total cost Є  Effectiveness (number of TB cases avoided)  ICER Є 
TST  333.33  5,861,852.25  530  -------- 
TST plus QFT  486.76*  9,408,097.28  930  8865.61 
QFT  412.82  7,977,746.52  780  8463.57 
LTBI treatment
6H  473.24  2,703,146.88  304  --------- 
3HR  447.08  2,553,720.96  376  Dominant 
4R  827.45+  4,726,394.40  344  50,581.18 
9H  516.71  2,951,447.52  262   

Dx: diagnostic strategy; LTIT: latent tuberculous infection treatment.

Total cost: calculated for 19,328 contacts with an LTBI prevalence of 33.4%. Effectiveness: number of TB cases avoided, assuming that 10% of infected contacts will develop the disease over their lifetime. ICER (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio) = [total cost of strategy A1-total cost of strategy A2]/[effectiveness of strategy A1-effectiveness of strategy A2]; 6H: isoniazid for 6 months; 3HR: isoniazid and rifampicin for 3 months; 4R: rifampicin for 4 months; 9H: isoniazid for 9 months.


P < .05 with respect to the basic strategy (TST).


P < .05 with respect to the basic strategy (6H).

The cost per contact studied was higher than the Є368.23 reported in a German study2, but unlike our series, that study did not include the costs of preventive treatment. In another study conducted in Norway12, the average cost was Є1934, significantly higher than ours, due to differences in the costs charged, especially for medical consultations. If we extrapolate our results to the approximate number of contacts to be evaluated in Spain9, the estimated total cost of contacts study would be Є10.6 million.

With regard to LTBI treatment, the 3HR regimen was less expensive and more effective, confirming that it would be a better choice than 6H. This was also demonstrated in a cost-effectiveness study13 in which all short regimens, including 3HR, were more cost-effective than 6H, although the authors, unlike us, found that 4R was slightly better; however, our results should be interpreted with caution due to the low representation of 4R in our series.

With regard to diagnosis, the dual strategy and QFT were more expensive but more effective than TST, with an ICER of Є8865.61 and Є8463.57 per TB case avoided, respectively. If we bear in mind that health interventions with an ICER of up to Є30,000 are efficient14, both strategies would be cost-effective. To determine the best option, we must analyze the ICER together with the potential health benefit of the intervention, – in this case, identifying contacts with LTBI and offering them treatment to reduce the risk of developing TB as well the environment in which the strategy is implemented. Given that the percentage of LTBI is higher when the dual strategy is used, we believe that this would be the most appropriate in a country with a low incidence of disease, such as Spain.

Several studies conducted in low-incidence countries have shown that the use of both interferon-γ release assays (IGRA) and TST techniques is cost-effective in certain groups such as household contacts3,15 and health workers16. Spanish clinical guidelines also recommend this approach in children under the age of 5 and in individuals who are immunocompromised, HIV-positive, or receiving biological drugs, while for the contacts study they recommend that TST be complemented by IGRA in BCG-vaccinated individuals with a positive TST5,17. Our study included regular contacts, with exposure time to the index case greater or less than 6 hours a day, and sporadic, who accounted for 36% of the total. The rate of LTBI in both groups was higher when TST and QFT were used, but the difference among sporadic contacts was particularly striking (54.6% versus 19.1% for TST or 30.2% for QFT alone), suggesting that the dual strategy may be the best way of initiating the contacts study, regardless of exposure intensity.

Similarly, Erkens et al.18 in a series of 10,000 contacts, of which 39% were sporadic, found that adding IGRA to TST modified the diagnosis of LTBI in 40% of contacts. They argue that the higher cost would be balanced by a more accurate indication for preventive treatment, and consider this practice to be the most appropriate in low-prevalence countries.

Our study has some limitations. Firstly, its design has an inherent risk of selection bias. However, it should be noted that one of the main strengths of our study is that all researchers were TB experts who participate regularly in the PII-TB, which we believe ensure the quality of data collection and reduces this possibility of selection bias. Secondly, to determine effectiveness, we estimated that 10% of infected contacts might develop TB over their lifetime, while other studies suggest a rate of 15%19; however, we do not believe that this difference reduces the validity of our results. Finally, we did not analyze other indirect costs, such as transport or work absenteeism, so the total cost may be underestimated, but we should remember that this study was conducted in a country with high economic resources, so the likely impact of these factors on the final results would, in our opinion, be marginal.

We conclude that the study of TB contacts generates a significant health expense, derived mainly from diagnostic techniques and the treatment of latent tuberculosis infection. In this respect, we believe that the most appropriate strategy is the sequential use of TST plus QFT in all contacts, and treatment with 3HR.


This study was funded by the Instituto de la Salud Carlos III-Fondos FEDER grant PI17/00724 and by the Spanish Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery (SEPAR) grant 378/2017.

Conflict of interests

The authors state that they have no conflicts of interest.


The authors thank Prof. Roland Diel for his critical review of the final version of the manuscript.

PII-TB Research Group (Integrated Research Program-TB)

Fernando Álvarez Navascues (Unidad de Gestión Clínica Neumología Hospital Universitario San Agustín, Avilés, Spain). María Somoza-González (Servicio de Neumología Consorcio Sanitario de Terrassa, Terrassa, Spain). Christian Anchorena (Servicio de Neumología, Complexo Hospitalario de Pontevedra, Pontevedra, Spain). Ángel Domínguez-Castellano (Servicio de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain). Antón Penas-Truque (Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti, Lugo, Spain). Silvia Dorronsoro-Quintana (Sección de Neumología, Hospital de Zumárraga, Zumárraga, Spain). Juan-Francisco Medina-Gallardo (Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain). Lander Altube-Urrengoetxea (Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario de Galdakao, Galdakao, Spain). María Otero-Santiago (Hospital Universitario de A Coruña, Corunna, Spain). Concepción Rodríguez-García (Unidad de Gestión Clínica Neumología Hospital Universitario San Agustín, Avilés, Spain). Juan Rodríguez-López (Sección de Neumología Hospital Grande Covián, Arriondas, Spain).

J.M. Pina, L. Clotet, A. Ferrer, M.R. Sala, P. Garrido, L. Salleras, et al.
Cost-effectiveness of rifampin for 4 months and isoniazid for 6 months in the treatment of tuberculosis infection.
Respir Med., 107 (2013), pp. 768-777
R. Diel, A. Nienhaus.
Cost of illness of non-multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Germany: an update.
A. Nienhaus, A. Schablon, J.T. Costa, R. Diel.
Systematic review of cost and cost-effectiveness of different TB-screening strategies.
BMC Health Serv Res., 11 (2011), pp. 247
E. Fair, C.R. Miller, S.E. Ottmani, G.J. Fox, P.C. Hopewell.
Tuberculosis contact investigation in low- and middle-income countries: standardized definitions and indicators.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis., 19 (2015), pp. 269-272
I. Mir Viladrich, E. Daudén Tello, G. Solano-López, F.J. López Longo, C. Taxonera Samso, P. Sánchez Martínez, et al.
Consensus document on prevention and treatment of tuberculosis in patients for biological treatment.
Arch Bronconeumol., 52 (2016), pp. 36-45
Decreto 194/2019, de 31 de octubre, de segunda modificación del decreto 87/2009, de 29 de julio, por el que se establecen los precios públicos a aplicar por el Servicio de Salud del Principado de Asturias por la prestación de servicios sanitarios. Boletín Oficial del Principado de Asturias. Número 219 de 13-XI-2019: 1-7.
Agencia de Salud Pública de Barcelona. Anuncio sobre la aprobación definitiva de los precios públicos para la Agencia de Salud Pública de Barcelona para el año 2017. Diari Oficial de la Generalitat de Catalunya. Núm. 7325-9.3.2017: 1-12.
J.A. Gullón, J.M. García-García, M.Á. Villanueva, F. Álvarez-Navascues, T. Rodrigo, M.T. Casals, et al.
Tuberculosis costs in Spain and related factors.
Arch Bronconeumol., 52 (2016), pp. 583-589
R. Sloot, M.F. Schim van der Loeff, P.M. Kouw, M.W. Borgdorff.
Risk of tuberculosis after recent exposure. A 10-year follow-up study of contacts in Amsterdam.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med., 190 (2014), pp. 1044-1052
D. Zenner, N. Beer, R.J. Harris, M.C. Lipman, H.R. Stagg, M.J. van der Werf.
Treatment of latent tuberculosis infection: an updated network meta-analysis.
Ann Intern Med., 167 (2017), pp. 248-255
F.S. Haukaas, T.M. Arnesen, B.A. Winje, E. Aas.
Immigrant screening for latent tuberculosis in Norway: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Eur J Health Econ., 18 (2017), pp. 405-415
T.N. Doan, G.J. Fox, M.T. Meehan, N. Scott, R. Ragonnet, K. Viney, et al.
Cost-effectiveness of 3 months of weekly rifapentine and isoniazid compared with other standard treatment regimens for latent tuberculosis infection: a decision analysis study.
J Antimicrob Chemother., 74 (2019), pp. 218-227
L. Prieto, J.A. Sacristán, J.L. Pinto, X. Badia, F. Antoñanzas, J. del Llano.
Grupo ECOMED. Analysis of costs and results of the economic assessment of health interventions.
Med Clin (Barc)., 122 (2004), pp. 423-429
A. Pooran, H. Booth, R.F. Miller, G. Scott, M. Badri, J.F. Huggett, et al.
Different screening strategies (single or dual) for the diagnosis of suspected latent tuberculosis: a cost effectiveness analysis.
BMC Pulm Med., 10 (2010), pp. 7
M.T. Del Campo, H. Fouad, M.M. Solís-Bravo, M.A. Sánchez-Uriz, I. Mahíllo-Fernández, J. Esteban.
Cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies (single or dual) for the diagnosis of tuberculosis infection in healthcare workers.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol., 33 (2012), pp. 1226-1234
M. Santin, J.M. García-García, D. Rigau, N. Altet, L. Anibarro, I. Casas, et al.
Sumario ejecutivo de la guía de práctica clínica sobre el uso de las pruebas de liberación de interferón-gamma para el diagnóstico de infección tuberculosa.
Arch Bronconeumol., 52 (2016), pp. 477-481
C.G. Erkens, A.G. Dinmohamed, M. Kamphorst, S. Toumanian, R. van Nispen-Dobrescu, M. Alink, et al.
Added value of interferon-gamma release assays in screening for tuberculous infection in the Netherlands.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis., 18 (2014), pp. 413-420
J.M. Trauer, N. Moyo, E.L. Tay, K. Dale, R. Ragonnet, E.S. McBryde, et al.
Risk of active tuberculosis in the five years following infection… 15%?.
Chest., 149 (2016), pp. 516-525

Members of the PII-TB Research Group (Integrated Research Program-TB) are listed in the Appendix.

Copyright © 2021. SEPAR
Archivos de Bronconeumología

Subscribe to our newsletter

Article options

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?