Publish in this journal
Journal Information
Vol. 51. Issue 11.
Pages 590-597 (November 2015)
Visits
5445
Vol. 51. Issue 11.
Pages 590-597 (November 2015)
Review
DOI: 10.1016/j.arbr.2015.09.015
Full text access
Review of Non-bacterial Infections in Respiratory Medicine: Viral Pneumonia
Revisión sobre las infecciones no bacterianas del aparato respiratorio: neumonías víricas
Visits
5445
José María Galvána, Olga Rajasb, Javier Aspab,
Corresponding author
jaspa@separ.es

Corresponding author.
a Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, IIS-IP, Madrid, Spain
b Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, IIS-IP, Madrid, Spain
This item has received
5445
Visits
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Tables (3)
Table 1. Differential Factors Between Viral Pneumonia and Bacterial Pneumonia.
Table 2. Viruses Related with Community-Acquired viral Pneumonia in Children and Adults.
Table 3. Characteristics of the Main Viruses Involved in Viral Pneumonia.
Show moreShow less
Abstract

Although bacteria are the main pathogens involved in community-acquired pneumonia, a significant number of community-acquired pneumonia are caused by viruses, either directly or as part of a co-infection. The clinical picture of these different pneumonias can be very similar, but viral infection is more common in the pediatric and geriatric populations, leukocytes are not generally elevated, fever is variable, and upper respiratory tract symptoms often occur; procalcitonin levels are not generally affected. For years, the diagnosis of viral pneumonia was based on cell culture and antigen detection, but since the introduction of polymerase chain reaction techniques in the clinical setting, identification of these pathogens has increased and new microorganisms such as human bocavirus have been discovered. In general, influenza virus type A and syncytial respiratory virus are still the main pathogens involved in this entity. However, in recent years, outbreaks of deadly coronavirus and zoonotic influenza virus have demonstrated the need for constant alert in the face of new emerging pathogens. Neuraminidase inhibitors for viral pneumonia have been shown to reduce transmission in cases of exposure and to improve the clinical progress of patients in intensive care; their use in common infections is not recommended. Ribavirin has been used in children with syncytial respiratory virus, and in immunosuppressed subjects. Apart from these drugs, no antiviral has been shown to be effective. Prevention with anti-influenza virus vaccination and with monoclonal antibodies, in the case of syncytial respiratory virus, may reduce the incidence of pneumonia.

Keywords:
Viral pneumonia
Influenza virus
Respiratory syncytial virus
Coronavirus
Co-infection
Procalcitonin
Polymerase chain reaction
Antivirals
Vaccination
Resumen

Aunque las bacterias son los principales patógenos involucrados en la neumonía adquirida en la comunidad, algunos virus son responsables directos o en coinfección de un importante número de neumonías adquiridas en la comunidad. La clínica de estas neumonías puede ser muy similar, en el caso de los virus afectan más frecuentemente a la población infantil y geriátrica, con frecuencia no elevan la cifra de leucocitos, la fiebre es inconstante y frecuentemente se acompañan de síntomas de vías respiratorias altas. Característicamente no elevan la procalcitonina. Durante años el diagnóstico ha recaído en cultivos celulares y en detección de antígenos; desde la incorporación en la clínica de la PCR, la identificación de estos patógenos ha aumentado, descubriéndose nuevos microorganismos como el bocavirus. En general, el virus influenza A y el virus respiratorio sincitial siguen siendo los principales virus implicados. Sin embargo, la irrupción en los últimos años de epidemias con alta letalidad de coronavirus y de zoonosis de virus influenza hace que sea necesario mostrarse alerta ante estos nuevos patógenos emergentes. Los inhibidores de la neuraminidasa para neumonías víricas han demostrado disminuir la transmisión en casos expuestos y mejorar la evolución clínica en pacientes en Cuidados Intensivos; su uso en infecciones banales no está recomendado. La ribavirina ha sido utilizada en niños con infecciones por virus respiratorio sincitial, así como en inmunodeprimidos. Fuera de estos fármacos, ningún otro antiviral ha probado su eficacia. Las medidas de prevención con vacunación para virus influenza y con anticuerpos monoclonales para virus respiratorio sincitial podrían disminuir la incidencia de neumonía.

Palabras clave:
Neumonía vírica
Virus influenza
Virus respiratorio sincitial
Coronavirus
Coinfección
Procalcitonina
Reacción en cadena de la polimerasa
Antivirales
Vacunación
Full Text
Introduction

According to WHO estimates for 2012, around 450 million cases of pneumonia occur worldwide every year, causing 3 million deaths, and accounting for 5.5% of overall mortality worldwide.1,2 It is the fourth cause of death worldwide, and is a particularly a serious threat to children and the elderly.1,3

Bacterial infections, being more common, have been more extensively studied. In contrast, research into viral community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), despite its growing epidemiological significance in developing countries and in the pediatric population, has been limited.4 Assuming the rate of diagnosis to still be lower than real incidence, around 200 million cases of viral pneumonia occur annually throughout the world, half of which are in children.5 Viral pneumonia is of great interest due to its impact on infant mortality, its role as a facilitator of bacterial infections (co-infections), and its ease of transmission, a factor which has transformed it into a worldwide threat.

In this review, we will focus on CAP caused by respiratory viruses in immunocompetent patients.

Differentiating Between Viral and Bacterial Pneumonia

It is important to distinguish between CAP of viral and bacterial origin. Clinical, radiological and laboratory variables that are commonly used to distinguish between these entities are listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Differential Factors Between Viral Pneumonia and Bacterial Pneumonia.

  Suggestive of viral origin  Suggestive of bacterial origin 
Age  Younger than 5 and older than 65 years  Adults 
Epidemic status  Seasonal or epidemic outbreaks  Throughout the year 
Disease course  Slow onset  Rapid onset 
Clinical profile  Most frequently rhinitis and wheezing  Most frequently high fever and tachypnea 
Total leukocyte count on admission  <10×106c/L  >15×106c/L and <4×106c/L 
C-reactive protein on admission  <20mg/L  >60mg/L 
Serum procalcitonin on admission  <0.1μg/L  >0.5μg/L (>1μg/L with greater specificity) 
Chest X-ray  Bilateral, interstitial infiltrates  Lobar alveolar infiltrates 
Response to antibiotic treatment  Slow response or no response  Rapid 
Adapted from Ruuskanen et al.3

Epidemiological studies have been published by many authors. Ruiz-González et al.6 included patients with viral and intracellular bacterial pneumonia in the same group. They concluded that pneumonia caused by intracellular pathogens affected older patients, had a more insidious disease course, and often did not produce leukocytosis. Johnstone et al.7 found that patients with viral pneumonia had more cardiac comorbidities and were older; Ma et al.8 found that institutionalization led to a greater risk of viral CAP. Liu et al.9 reported that viral pneumonia caused more cough and less pleuritic pain, while Jennings et al.10 found myalgia to be the symptom most commonly associated with the viral disease. Despite the many publications, predicting the viral etiology from clinical parameters is difficult and often inaccurate, as affirmed recently by Viasus et al.11

With regard to radiological changes, focal alveolar infiltrates have been traditionally associated with the bacterial entity, and bilateral, interstitial infiltrates with the viral form.12 However, recent studies using chest computed tomography (CT) have shown that a viral etiology cannot be ruled out by the appearance of localized alveolar infiltrates, and these may even signal the onset of many viral pneumonias.13

Viral infections do not usually affect the number of leukocytes, so the use of acute phase reactants, such as procalcitonin, as biomarkers may be of great help in reaching a diagnosis.14 Procalcitonin production depends on the presence of circulating tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α); in viral infections, macrophages produce interferon-α that can inhibit TNF-α, suppressing the elevation of procalcitonin, thus suggesting a viral origin.15

Despite these assertions, there is no gold standard for differentiating the etiology of pneumonia.16 Moreover, we must not forget that CAP, whether viral or bacterial, is a dynamic entity: differences in biomarker values or the appearance of infiltrates on radiology are only snapshots of an active process that can vary widely from day to day.

Types of Viruses

The list of viruses that can cause respiratory infection is long (Table 2). In this review, we will focus particularly on seasonal respiratory viruses.

Table 2.

Viruses Related with Community-Acquired viral Pneumonia in Children and Adults.

Syncytial respiratory virus 
Rhinovirus 
Influenza A, B and C virus 
Human metapneumovirus 
Parainfluenza virus type 1, 2, 3 and 4 
Human bocavirus 
Coronavirus type 229E, OC43, NL63, HKU1, SARS and MERS-CoV 
Adenovirus 
Enterovirus 
Varicella zoster virus, Epstein–Barr virus, human herpesvirus 6 and 7, cytomegalovirus 
Hantavirus 
Parechovirus 
Mimivirus 
Measles virus 
Adapted from Ruuskanen et al.3

Other viruses that have recently received considerable media attention, such as H5N1 influenza virus or coronaviruses (responsible for severe acute respiratory syndrome or the Middle East respiratory syndrome, MERS-CoV) will be examined in less depth.

The relative incidence and clinical and epidemiological characteristics of the different respiratory viruses are listed in Table 3.

Table 3.

Characteristics of the Main Viruses Involved in Viral Pneumonia.

Virus  Family  Subtype  Incidence of CAPRisk factorsSeasonality  Differential clinical factors  Treatment 
      Children  Adults  Infection  Poor evolution       
Rhinovirus  Picornaviridae  –  ≈18%  ≈6%  All ages, but more in children  Asthma.Cellular immunosuppression  All year (more in autumn)  Upper airway symptoms: rhinorrhea, cough and nasal congestion  Pleconaril (compassionate use) 
Syncytial respiratory virus (SRV)  Paramyxoviridae  1 and 2  ≈11%  ≈3%  Newborn and premature babies. Immunosuppression  COPD. Asthma. Stem cell transplant. Immunosuppression  End of autumn, beginning of Winter  Marked bronchial reactivity  Inhaled ribavirin (children), IV ribavirin (immunosuppression) 
Influenza virus (IV)  Orthomyxoviridae  A and B seasonal  ≈10%  ≈8%  Children and geriatrics  >65 years. Comorbidities.Gestation. BMI ↑  End of autumn and winter  General asthenia. Influenza-like syndrome  NAI (OSE±resistant)Amantadines (not in B) 
    H1N1 09 pandemic  –  –  <65 years  Gestation. Homeless. Obesity  Specific outbreaks in waves  More pneumonias, ICU and mortality  NAI (ZAN and PER in critical patients) 
    H5N1  –  –  Contact with birds  Neutropenia and delayed diagnosis  Outbreaks throughout the year  Thrombocytopenia and kidney failure  High does NAI. Amantadines not beneficial 
Parainfluenza virus (PIV)  Paramyxoviridae  1, 2, 3 and 4  ≈8%  ≈2%  Geriatric care homes  Lung and stem cell transplant.Fragile elderly  Autumn (PIV1-2)Spring (PIV-3)  Laryngeal croup (children with PIV-1)  Ribavirin iv (immunosuppression) 
Metapneumovirus  Paramyxoviridae  –  ≈8%  ≈1%  Children<5 years  SRV coinfection. Immunosuppression  End of Winter and Spring  Wheezing. Asthma exacerbations  Ribavirin iv (immunosuppression) 
Coronavirus  Coronaviridae  229E, NL63 OC43, KU1  ≈7%  ≈5%  Geriatric care homes  Asthma. Immunosuppression  Winter  Diarrhea (OC43, and intermittent)  No proven treatment. Chloroquine 
    SARS  –  –  Bats and civets in Asia. Healthcare personnel  Elderly. DM. Hepatitis B. (Pediatric population protective factor)  Outbreaks throughout the year  Prodrome with fever and myalgia followed by a respiratory distress  No specific treatment.Corticosteroids used 
Adenovirus  Adenoviridae  7, 14, 16  ≈3%  ≈2%  Prisons (outbreaks)  Pneumococcus  All year  Conjunctivitis, diarrhea, encephalitis  Cidofovir (proven in immunosuppression) 
Bocavirus  Parvoviridae  –  ≈5%  <1%  Children<2 years  Poorly defined  End of autumn, beginning of winter  Otitis media and pneumonia (few studies)  No specific treatment 

BMI: body mass index; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; IV: intravenous; NAI: neuraminidase inhibitors (OSE: oseltamivir; PER: peramivir; ZAN: zanamivir).

Overall, syncytial respiratory virus (SRV) remains the primary causative agent of CAP in children, and the main cause of severe pneumonia in this population.17,18 Since the widespread introduction of PCR techniques, rhinoviruses are more often detected as the causative agent of viral pneumonia in children.19–22 However, because it is so frequently detected in asymptomatic individuals (15%), the etiological role of rhinovirus continues to be questioned, although it could be an indication of real, subclinical infections.23 Recently identified pathogens, such as metapneumovirus and human bocavirus,24–27 are less commonly encountered. Although the prevalence of viral pneumonia caused by adenovirus is low (2%–12%), it must be identified, as it can lead to necrotizing pneumonia.28 In this case, PCR techniques are much more sensitive than antigen detection techniques.29

In the case of adults, the most commonly detected viruses are influenza virus (IV), SRV and parainfluenza,5,10,30,31 although incidence varies depending on the diagnostic techniques used. These viruses are also the most important in Spain.32 Pneumonias caused by other viruses are more rarely reported and include outbreaks of rhinovirus,33,34 adenovirus35 (particularly serotype 14 in military institutions36), coronavirus,37 metapneumovirus,38 and even bocavirus (in immunocompromised patients).39

Co-infection

Infections involving both respiratory bacteria and viruses or 2 different viruses are common. The most widely accepted hypothesis is that the viral infection occurs first, followed by the bacterial form. Viral-mediated activation of proinflammatory molecules, such as interleukin-10, is thought to attract large numbers of neutrophils and macrophages to the lung. The arrival of these cytokines amplifies the immune response, causing inflammatory damage and preventing the proper clearance of bacteria.40 Bacterial superinfection worsens the prognosis of the original viral infection. Indeed, research into the influenza pandemics of 1918, 1957, and 1968 shows that most deaths were caused by a secondary bacterial infection.41 During the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, 4%–24% of cases presented secondary bacterial infection.42–44 In infections caused by other viruses, however, especially H5N1 avian influenza, the associated pneumonia appears to be caused (more frequently) by direct viral action.45

In clinical practice, this type of co-infection is particularly common in children (up to 45% of cases with CAP), and mainly involves pneumococcus,46–49 thus increasing clinical severity.50Mycoplasma pneumoniae and several species of Chlamydophila51 are also common,51 while simultaneous co-infection with 2–3 viruses is not unusual.52

CAP of mixed etiology has been characterized less in adults than in children, and prevalence is estimated at less than 5%.7,13 The most common combinations reported are rhinovirus+pneumococcus and influenza A virus+pneumococcus. More serious infections have been identified with the combination of viruses with Legionella pneumophila.53

Data on morbidity and mortality in bacterial/viral co-infection are contradictory. Hong et al.54 consider that these co-infections are no more severe than purely bacterial infections, and affect older patients and those with chronic lung diseases. In contrast, Johansson et al.55 and Seki et al.56 found that mixed etiology pneumonia was associated with higher severity scale scores and poorer progress.

Respiratory Virus Outbreaks: Experience with H1N1 Influenza Virus in 2009, Avian Influenza (H5N1 and H7N9), SARS and Middle East Coronavirus (MERS-CoV)

Some very well-known families of respiratory viruses have produced new species and some very virulent serotypes, which in recent years have caused epidemics with significant associated morbidity and mortality.57

The great H1N1 IV-A epidemic of 2009 was unusual: transmission was enhanced by the lack of prior immunity, causing a serious medical situation worldwide.42 Studies performed subsequently showed that the younger population and certain risk groups were more affected, resulting in the loss of many more life-years.58 However, from an inter-generational perspective, the burden of death and major complications was no higher than that caused by normal seasonal influenza.59,60

In 2003, an outbreak of coronavirus in the Far East caused a severe acute respiratory syndrome. In the Middle East in 2012, another outbreak of a new coronavirus occurred, called Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV).61 In both epidemics, the incidence was reduced to a few hundred cases, partly due to the protective measures implemented,62 but mortality was high due to high virulence.63 Clinical symptoms were not only limited to rapidly developing bilateral pneumonia, but also included acute renal failure and severe hematological disturbances.63,64

Recombinations in animals of different IV subtypes are a global concern, as they are potentially capable of passing the species barrier, and occasionally propagating among humans.65 The serious cases of H5N1 avian influenza recorded in 2005 in Southeast Asia,66 or more recently the H3N2-porcine variant in the United States (2012),67 and H7N9 avian influence in China (2013),68 are examples of this new threat. Fortunately, surveillance systems for monitoring animal reserves and activating a rapid medical response are improving.69

Microbiological Diagnosis

The detection of virus or viral antigens in upper (nasopharyngeal aspirates) and lower (bronchoalveolar lavage and induced sputum) respiratory tract samples is usually based on culture and immunofluorescence microscopy. The detection of antibodies generated during the process of viral infection has also been used for years: seroconversion in 2 samples obtained over a period of time is suggestive of a new exposure to the pathogen. The introduction of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques has improved the detection of respiratory viruses, particularly with the use of real-time techniques.3

The preferred specimen for upper respiratory samples, particularly in children, is nasopharyngeal aspirate, which combines a mixture of nasal and retropharyngeal secretions.70 The use of sterile cotton wool swabs yields a similar sensitivity for most viruses, with the exception of SRV.71,72 Devices that combine a nylon fiber swab and a container of universal transport medium provide a high diagnostic yield at all ages, comparable to nasopharyngeal lavage.30,73

Samples from the lower respiratory tract, being obtained at the site of the infection, have obvious advantages when determining the cause of pneumonia. However, contamination may occur during sampling, as the specimen passes through the upper airways. Induced sputum is often obtained from children, but bronchoalveolar lavage is preferred in adults.3 In contrast, the invasive character of other forms of diagnosis, such as transthoracic puncture, has led to their disuse.70

In sample processing, PCR-based systems are 2–5 times more sensitive than conventional methods for the detection of respiratory viruses.30 This technique is particularly useful in the elderly, who often have a lower nasopharyngeal viral burden than children.74,75 Moreover, some viruses (such as bocavirus) are hard to culture, and antigen testing may be equivocal (e.g. parainfluenza or adenovirus), so they can only be satisfactorily identified using PCR.76–78 A standard identification test has been developed that uses a PCR platform combined with microarrays to simultaneously determine more than 15 different respiratory viruses.79 These platforms are the techniques most commonly used in our hospitals at the moment.80

Etiological Treatment

Since the end of the last century, empirical antibiotic treatment of CAP has been initiated as soon as possible, as this has been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality.81

However, no prospective studies have examined the benefits of antibiotics in pneumonias with a high suspicion of viral origin. The possibility of bacterial superinfection or a mixed viral-bacterial etiology, progressive improvements in antibiotic tolerability, and the medical-legal requirement to “use of all available measures”, mean that physicians are unlikely to resist prescribing antibiotics in a patient presenting with pneumonia. This dilemma has only been prospectively studied in children, in the context of SRV bronchiolitis epidemics; the results, while not definitive, do not support the generalized administration of antibiotics.82

Experience in the use of antiviral drugs in respiratory viruses can be divided into 3 areas: (a) treatment for influenza virus, which is relatively effective and well documented, thanks mainly to studies performed during the 2009 pandemic83; (b) treatment for SRV, that has been mostly explored in children and immunosuppressed populations, although results remain unclear84; and (c) treatment of other respiratory viruses, which has not been studied in depth and remains largely unevaluated.85

Treatment of Influenza Virus

Neuraminidase, an enzyme of the IV capsid, is essential for intercellular viral propagation. Selective inhibitors of this enzyme (oseltamivir, zanamivir and peramivir) have been seen to contain infection during the peak of viral replication – the first 24–72hours – improving clinical symptoms and reducing morbidity and mortality.86,87 Retrospective studies of patients with a diagnosis of influenza have shown reductions in the incidence of pneumonia in patients who received early treatment.88 Although these drugs are active against both subtypes, seasonal epidemics of oseltamivir-resistant H1N1 IV-A have been described, so some guidelines recommend zanamivir as a first-line approach.83 The pandemic H1N1 strain of 2009 did not generally show this resistance profile, and was widely treated with oseltamivir, with no detriment to outcomes.89 In children, the clinical effect is less clear, but administration appears to be safe.90 Laninamivir octanoate, a new neuraminidase inhibitor for inhaled administration only, has been seen to be effective in the treatment of IV infection, including oseltamivir-resistant strains.91

Adamantanes (amantadine and rimantadine) are drugs that are conventionally used in IV infection. They are exclusively specific to influenza virus type A. This, along with their potential for side effects and rapid development of resistances, has meant that they have fallen into disuse in clinical practice.92 Drugs that can block RNA production and others that limit viral integration are under investigation, but no clinical trials have been started.93 Studies are also being conducted with immunomodulators, with the aim of reducing viral-mediated inflammation and alleviating its effect on the host.94

Treatment of Syncytial Respiratory Virus

None of the treatments tested has been significantly useful in the management of acute episodes of pneumonia or for improving respiratory parameters in follow-up. According to the largest meta-analysis performed in children to date, inhaled ribavirin during pneumonia can reduce hospital stay and time on mechanical ventilation, but does not significantly improve overall mortality.95 Intravenous or oral administration of ribavirin has been used almost exclusively in severely immunocompromised patients (bone marrow or lung transplant recipients). Outcomes have been positive, but the results were not applicable to other patients.96 The use of immunoglobulins in children has not shown any benefits over supportive treatment alone.97 Generalized use of bronchodilators, corticosteroids or antibiotics is not recommended in the American pediatric guidelines for SRV bronchiolitis.98 Trials are currently underway on new products such as catelicidin LL-37 (a vitamin D derivate)99 and dingchuan decoction, a Chinese medicinal product,100 and results are promising.

Treatment of Other Respiratory Viruses

Until recently, only supportive treatment has been available. However, some antiviral medications are currently under investigation. The cytidine analog, cidofovir, originally developed as treatment for CMV, has shown success in vitro against adenoviruses, although the response in immunocompromised patients with several forms of severe pneumonia was poor.101 Intravenous ribavirin has been used with success in lung transplant recipients with respiratory infections caused by metapneumovirus.102 Pleconaril, which incorporates itself into the capsid of Rhinovirus and Enterovirus, has been successfully used in limited case series; it is not yet on the market and is limited to compassionate use.103 There is little doubt that intravenous acyclovir is beneficial in the rare cases of varicella zoster pneumonia in immunocompromised patients.85,104 Lastly, treatment with high-dose corticosteroids can improve the clinical course of viral CAP,85 although this application is still controversial.

Prevention Measures

In infectious and contagious diseases, particularly of the respiratory tract, barrier methods are essential for preventing infection. Use of masks and gloves and hand-washing have been shown to be effective in reducing transmission rates in the healthcare setting.105 Social isolation of patients during the clinical phase of the disease is also strongly recommended and reduces overall incidence.106 However, it is difficult to implement these measures properly.106

Immunization plays a very important role in prevention, but is only available for a few viruses. Anti-influenza A and B vaccines have been shown to reduce transmission during seasonal influenza epidemics in the general population,107 but their effect on the course of pneumonia or on mortality is not so clear108; nor is their efficiency in children younger than 2 years, although they continue to be administered in many countries.109 In contrast, they appear to be very effective in elderly institutionalized subjects.110 They are currently recommended in Spain for patients with respiratory comorbidities or immunosuppression, individuals over 65 years of age, and healthcare workers.111

In addition to vaccines, chemoprophylaxis with neuroaminidase inhibitors has been successfully tested during seasonal influenza epidemics.112 As yet, no effective vaccine is available for SRV, but palivizumab has been used as chemoprophylaxis. This is a humanized monoclonal antibody that has shown a reduction of up to 50% in the incidence of pneumonia and associated hospital admissions in neonates with a high risk of infection.113

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

References
[1]
WHO.
Disease and injury regional mortality estimates, 2000–2012 – global summary estimates.
(2012),
[2]
I. Rudan, C. Boschi-Pinto, Z. Biloglav, K. Mulholland, H. Campbell.
Epidemiology and etiology of childhood pneumonia.
Bull World Health Organ, 86 (2008), pp. 408-416
[3]
O. Ruuskanen, E. Lahti, L.C. Jennings, D.R. Murdoch.
Viral pneumonia.
Lancet, 377 (2011), pp. 1264-1275
[4]
K. McIntosh.
Community-acquired pneumonia in children.
N Engl J Med, 346 (2002), pp. 429-437
[5]
G.G.U. Rohde.
The role of viruses in CAP. Monograph 63: community-acquired pneumonia.
Eur Respir Monogr, 63 (2014), pp. 74-87
[6]
A. Ruiz-González, M. Falguera, M. Vives, A. Nogués, J.M. Porcel, M. Rubio-Caballero.
Community-acquired pneumonia: development of a bedside predictive model and scoring system to identify the aetiology.
Respir Med, 94 (2000), pp. 505-510
[7]
J. Johnstone, S.R. Majumdar, J.D. Fox, T.J. Marrie.
Viral infection in adults hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia: prevalence, pathogens, and presentation.
Chest, 134 (2008), pp. 1141-1148
[8]
H.M. Ma, K.P. Lee, J. Woo.
Predictors of viral pneumonia: the need for viral testing in all patients hospitalized for nursing home-acquired pneumonia.
Geriatr Gerontol Int, 13 (2013), pp. 949-957
[9]
Y.F. Liu, Y. Gao, M.F. Chen, B. Cao, X.H. Yang, L. Wei.
Etiological analysis and predictive diagnostic model building of community-acquired pneumonia in adult outpatients in Beijing, China.
BMC Infect Dis, 13 (2013), pp. 309
[10]
L.C. Jennings, T.P. Anderson, K.A. Beynon, A. Chua, R.T. Laing, A.M. Werno, et al.
Incidence and characteristics of viral community-acquired pneumonia in adults.
Thorax, 63 (2008), pp. 42-48
[11]
D. Viasus, C. Marinescu, A. Villoslada, E. Cordero, J. Gálvez-Acebal, M.C. Fariñas, et al.
Community-acquired pneumonia during the first post-pandemic influenza season: a prospective, multicentre cohort study.
J Infect, 67 (2013), pp. 185-193
[12]
R.D. Tarver, S.D. Teague, D.E. Heitkamp, D.J. Conces.
Radiology of community-acquired pneumonia.
Radiol Clin North Am, 43 (2005), pp. 497-512
[13]
K.T. Shiley, V.M. van Deerlin, W.T. Miller.
Chest CT features of community-acquired respiratory viral infections in adult inpatients with lower respiratory tract infections.
J Thorac Imaging, 25 (2010), pp. 68-75
[14]
D.N. Gilbert.
Use of plasma procalcitonin levels as an adjunct to clinical microbiology.
J Clin Microbiol, 48 (2010), pp. 2325-2329
[15]
N. Johansson, M. Kalin, C. Backman-Johansson, A. Larsson, K. Nilsson, J. Hedlund.
Procalcitonin levels in community-acquired pneumonia – correlation with aetiology and severity.
Scand J Infect Dis, (2014), pp. 1-5
[16]
D.M. Musher, I.L. Roig, G. Cazares, C.E. Stager, N. Logan, H. Safar.
Can an etiologic agent be identified in adults who are hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia: results of a one-year study.
J Infect, 67 (2013), pp. 11-18
[17]
J.A. Berkley, P. Munywoki, M. Ngama, S. Kazungu, J. Abwao, A. Bett, et al.
Viral etiology of severe pneumonia among Kenyan infants and children.
JAMA, 303 (2010), pp. 2051-2057
[18]
H. Nair, D.J. Nokes, B.D. Gessner, M. Dherani, S.A. Madhi, R.J. Singleton, et al.
Global burden of acute lower respiratory infections due to respiratory syncytial virus in young children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lancet, 375 (2010), pp. 1545-1555
[19]
F.G. Hayden.
Rhinovirus and the lower respiratory tract.
Rev Med Virol, 14 (2004), pp. 17-31
[20]
J.K. Louie, A. Roy-Burman, L. Guardia-Labar, E.J. Boston, D. Kiang, T. Padilla, et al.
Rhinovirus associated with severe lower respiratory tract infections in children.
Pediatr Infect Dis J, 28 (2009), pp. 337-339
[21]
C. Calvo, M.L. García-García, C. Blanco, F. Pozo, I.C. Flecha, P. Pérez-Breña.
Role of rhinovirus in hospitalized infants with respiratory tract infections in Spain.
Pediatr Infect Dis J, 26 (2007), pp. 904-908
[22]
E.K. Miller, X. Lu, D.D. Erdman, K.A. Poehling, Y. Zhu, M.R. Griffin, for the New Vaccine Surveillance Network, et al.
Rhinovirus-associated hospitalizations in young children.
J Infect Dis, 195 (2007), pp. 773-781
[23]
T. Jartti, L. Jartti, V. Peltola, M. Waris, O. Ruuskanen.
Identification of respiratory viruses in asymptomatic subjects: asymptomatic respiratory viral infections.
Pediatr Infect Dis J, 27 (2008), pp. 1103-1107
[24]
J.V. Williams, P.A. Harris, S.J. Tollefson, L.L. Halburnt-Rush, J.M. Pingsterhaus, K.M. Edwards, et al.
Human metapneumovirus and lower respiratory tract disease in otherwise healthy infants and children.
N Engl J Med, 350 (2004), pp. 443-450
[25]
A.M. Fry, X. Lu, M. Chittaganpitch, T. Peret, J. Fischer, S.F. Dowell, et al.
Human bocavirus: a novel parvovirus epidemiologically associated with pneumonia requiring hospitalization in Thailand.
J Infect Dis, 195 (2007), pp. 1038-1045
[26]
E. Milder, J.C. Arnold.
Human metapneumovirus and human bocavirus in children.
Pediatr Res, 65 (2009), pp. 78R-83R
[27]
J. Heugel, E.T. Martin, J. Kuypers, J.A. Englund.
Coronavirus-associated pneumonia in previously healthy children.
Pediatr Infect Dis J, 26 (2007), pp. 753-755
[28]
Z.Y. Ou, Q.Y. Zeng, F.H. Wang, H.M. Xia, J.P. Lu, J.Q. Xia, et al.
Retrospective study of adenovirus in autopsied pulmonary tissue of pediatric fatal pneumonia in South China.
BMC Infect Dis, 8 (2008), pp. 122
[29]
F. Freymuth, A. Vabret, F. Galateau-Salle, J. Ferey, G. Eugene, J. Petitjean, et al.
Detection of respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenzavirus 3, adenovirus and rhinovirus sequences in respiratory tract of infants by polymerase chain reaction and hybridization.
Clin Diagn Virol, 8 (1997), pp. 31-40
[30]
N. Johansson, M. Kalin, A. Tiveljung-Lindell, C.G. Giske, J. Hedlund.
Etiology of community-acquired pneumonia: increased microbiological yield with new diagnostic methods.
Clin Infect Dis, 50 (2010), pp. 202-209
[31]
D. Lieberman, A. Shimoni, Y. Shemer-Avni, A. Keren-Naos, R. Shtainberg, D. Lieberman.
Respiratory viruses in adults with community-acquired pneumonia.
Chest, 138 (2010), pp. 811-816
[32]
M. Angeles Marcos, M. Camps, T. Pumarola, J. Antonio Martinez, E. Martinez, J. Mensa, et al.
The role of viruses in the aetiology of community-acquired pneumonia in adults.
Antivir Ther, 11 (2006), pp. 351-359
[33]
L.A. Hicks, C.W. Shepard, P.H. Britz, D.D. Erdman, M. Fischer, B.L. Flannery, et al.
Two outbreaks of severe respiratory disease in nursing homes associated with rhinovirus.
J Am Geriatr Soc, 54 (2006), pp. 284-289
[34]
J.K. Louie, S. Yagi, F.A. Nelson, D. Kiang, C.A. Glaser, J. Rosenberg, et al.
Rhinovirus outbreak in a long term care facility for elderly persons associated with unusually high mortality.
Clin Infect Dis, 41 (2005), pp. 262-265
[35]
D.H. Esposito, T.J. Gardner, E. Schneider, L.J. Stockman, J.E. Tate, C.A. Panozzo, et al.
Outbreak of pneumonia associated with emergent human adenovirus serotype 14-Southeast Alaska, 2008.
J Infect Dis, 202 (2010), pp. 214-222
[36]
J.E. Tate, M.L. Bunning, L. Lott, X. Lu, J. Su, D. Metzgar, et al.
Outbreak of severe respiratory disease associated with emergent human adenovirus serotype 14 at a US air force training facility in 2007.
J Infect Dis, 199 (2009), pp. 1419-1426
[37]
J. Reina, C. López-Causapé, E. Rojo-Molinero, R. Rubio.
Clinico-epidemiological characteristics of acute respiratory infections caused by coronavirus OC43, NL63 and 229E.
Rev Clin Esp, 214 (2014), pp. 499-504
[38]
E.E. Walsh, D.R. Peterson, A.R. Falsey.
Human metapneumovirus infections in adults: another piece of the puzzle.
Ann Intern Med, 168 (2008), pp. 2489-2496
[39]
B. Kupfer, J. Vehreschild, O. Cornely, R. Kaiser, G. Plum, S. Viazov, et al.
Severe pneumonia and human bocavirus in adult.
Emerg Infect Dis, 12 (2006), pp. 1614-1616
[40]
J.A. McCullers.
Insights into the interaction between influenza virus and pneumococcus.
Clin Microbiol Rev, 19 (2006), pp. 571-582
[41]
D.M. Morens, J.K. Taubenberger, A.S. Fauci.
Predominant role of bacterial pneumonia as a cause of death in pandemic influenza: implications for pandemic influenza preparedness.
J Infect Dis, 198 (2008), pp. 962-970
[42]
E. Bautista, T. Chotpitayasunondh, Z. Gao, S.A. Harper, M. Shaw, T.M. Uyeki, Writing Committee of the WHO Consultation on Clinical Aspects of Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 Influenza, et al.
Clinical aspects of pandemic 2009 influenza A (H1N1) virus infection.
N Engl J Med, 362 (2010), pp. 1708-1719
[43]
J.K. Louie, M. Acosta, K. Winter, C. Jean, S. Gavali, R. Schechter, for the California Pandemic (H1N1) Working Group, et al.
Factors associated with death or hospitalization due to pandemic 2009 influenza A(H1N1) infection in California.
JAMA, 302 (2009), pp. 1896-1902
[44]
A. Kumar, R. Zarychanski, R. Pinto, D.J. Cook, J. Marshall, J. Lacroix, et al.
Critically ill patients with 2009 influenza A(H1N1) infection in Canada.
JAMA, 302 (2009), pp. 1872-1879
[45]
J.H. Beigel, J. Farrar, A.M. Han, F.G. Hayden, R. Hyer, M.D. de Jong, Writing Committee of the WHO Consultation on human influenza A/H5, et al.
Avian influenza A (H5N1) infection in humans.
N Engl J Med, 353 (2005), pp. 1374-1385
[46]
P. Lehtinen, T. Jartti, R. Virkki, T. Vuorinen, M. Leinonen, V. Peltola, et al.
Bacterial coinfections in children with viral wheezing.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 25 (2006), pp. 463-469
[47]
Z. Xiang, R. Gonzalez, Z. Xie, Y. Xiao, J. Liu, L. Chen, et al.
Human rhinovirus C infections mirror those of human rhinovirus A in children with community-acquired pneumonia.
J Clin Virol, 49 (2010), pp. 94-99
[48]
M. Korppi.
Mixed microbial aetiology of community-acquired pneumonia in children.
APMIS, 110 (2002), pp. 515-522
[49]
O.S. Levine, K.L. O’Brien, M. Deloria-Knoll, D.R. Murdoch, D.R. Feikin, A.N. deLuca, et al.
The Pneumonia etiology research for child health project: a 21st century childhood pneumonia etiology study.
Clin Infect Dis, 54 (2012), pp. S93-S101
[50]
Y. Harada, F. Kinoshita, L.M. Yoshida, N. Minh le, M. Suzuki, K. Morimoto, et al.
Does respiratory virus coinfection increases the clinical severity of acute respiratory infection among children infected with respiratory syncytial virus.
Pediatr Infect Dis J, 32 (2013), pp. 441-445
[51]
C.J. Chen, P.Y. Lin, M.H. Tsai, C.G. Huang, K.C. Tsao, K.S. Wong, et al.
Etiology of community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized children in northern Taiwan.
Pediatr Infect Dis J, 31 (2012), pp. e196-e201
[52]
M. Honkinen, E. Lahti, R. Österback, O. Ruuskanen, M. Waris.
Viruses and bacteria in sputum samples of children with community-acquired pneumonia.
Clin Microbiol Infect, 18 (2012), pp. 300-307
[53]
B.M. Diederen, M.M. van der Eerden, F. Vlaspolder, W.G. Boersma, J.A. Kluytmans, M.F. Peeters.
Detection of respiratory viruses and Legionella spp. by real-time polymerase chain reaction in patients with community acquired pneumonia.
Scand J Infect Dis, 41 (2009), pp. 45-50
[54]
H.L. Hong, S.B. Hong, G.B. Ko, J.W. Huh, H. Sung, K.H. Do, et al.
Viral infection is not uncommon in adult patients with severe hospital-acquired pneumonia.
[55]
N. Johansson, M. Kalin, J. Hedlund.
Clinical impact of combined viral and bacterial infection in patients with community-acquired pneumonia.
Scand J Infect Dis, 43 (2011), pp. 609-615
[56]
M. Seki, K. Kosai, K. Yanagihara, Y. Higashiyama, S. Kurihara, K. Izumikawa, et al.
Disease severity in patients with simultaneous influenza and bacterial pneumonia.
Intern Med, 46 (2007), pp. 953-958
[57]
P. Gautret, G.C. Gray, R.N. Charrel, N.G. Odezulu, J.A. Al-Tawfiq, A. Zumla, et al.
Emerging viral respiratory tract infections-environmental risk factors and transmission.
Lancet Infect Dis, 14 (2014), pp. 1113-1122
[58]
L. Simonsen, P. Spreeuwenberg, R. Lustig, R.J. Taylor, D.M. Fleming, M. Kroneman, et al.
Global mortality estimates for the 2009 Influenza Pandemic from the GLaMOR project: a modeling study.
PLoS Med, 10 (2013), pp. e1001558
[59]
M. Lemaitre, F. Carrat, G. Rey, M. Miller, L. Simonsen, C. Viboud.
Mortality burden of the 2009 A/H1N1 influenza pandemic in France: comparison to seasonal influenza and the A/H3N2 pandemic.
[60]
A.C. Hayward, E.B. Fragaszy, A. Bermingham, L. Wang, A. Copas, W.J. Edmunds, et al.
Comparative community burden and severity of seasonal and pandemic influenza: results of the Flu Watch cohort study.
Lancet Respir Med, 2 (2014), pp. 445-454
[61]
C.M. Coleman, M.B. Frieman.
Coronaviruses: important emerging human pathogens.
J Virol, 88 (2014), pp. 5209-5212
[62]
R.L. Graham, E.F. Donaldson, R.S. Baric.
A decade after SARS: strategies for controlling emerging coronaviruses.
Nat Rev Microbiol, 11 (2013), pp. 836-848
[63]
Y.M. Arabi, A.A. Arifi, H.H. Balkhy, H. Najm, A.S. Aldawood, A. Ghabashi, et al.
Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection.
Ann Intern Med, 160 (2014), pp. 389-397
[64]
A.M. Zaki, S. van Boheemen, T.M. Bestebroer, A.D. Osterhaus, R.A. Fouchier.
Isolation of a novel coronavirus from a man with pneumonia in Saudi Arabia.
N Engl J Med, 367 (2012), pp. 1814-1820
[65]
R.A. Medina, A. García-Sastre.
Influenza A viruses: new research developments.
Nat Rev Microbiol, 9 (2011), pp. 590-603
[66]
J.H. Beigel, J. Farrar, A.M. Han, F.G. Hayden, R. Hyer, M.D. de Jong, et al.
Avian influenza A (H5N1) infection in humans.
N Engl J Med, 353 (2005), pp. 1374-1385
[67]
A.S. Bowman, S.W. Nelson, S.L. Page, J.M. Nolting, M.L. Killian, S. Sreevatsan, et al.
Swine-to-human transmission of Influenza A(H3N2) virus at agricultural fairs, Ohio, USA, 2012.
Emerg Infect Dis, 20 (2014), pp. 1472-1480
[68]
R. Gao, B. Cao, Y. Hu, Z. Feng, D. Wang, W. Hu, et al.
Human infection with a novel avian-origin influenza A (H7N9) virus.
N Engl J Med, 368 (2013), pp. 1888-1897
[69]
J.A. Al-Tawfiq, A. Zumla, P. Gautret, G.C. Gray, D.S. Hui, A.A. Al-Rabeeah, et al.
Surveillance for emerging respiratory viruses.
Lancet Infect Dis, 14 (2014), pp. 992-1000
[70]
K. Loens, L. van Heirstraeten, S. Malhotra-Kumar, H. Goossens, M. Ieven.
Optimal sampling sites and methods for detection of pathogens possibly causing community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections.
J Clin Microbiol, 47 (2009), pp. 21-31
[71]
T. Heikkinen, J. Marttila, A.A. Salmi, O. Ruuskanen.
Nasal swab versus nasopharyngeal aspirate for isolation of respiratory viruses.
J Clin Microbiol, 40 (2002), pp. 4337-4339
[72]
A. Ruohola, M. Waris, T. Allander, T. Ziegler, T. Heikkinen, O. Ruuskanen.
Viral etiology of common cold in children, Finland.
Emerg Infect Dis, 15 (2009), pp. 344-346
[73]
D. Lieberman, D. Lieberman, A. Shimoni, A. Keren-Naus, R. Steinberg, Y. Shemer-Avni.
Identification of respiratory viruses in adults: nasopharyngeal versus oropharyngeal sampling.
J Clin Microbiol, 47 (2009), pp. 3439-3443
[74]
H.K. Talbot, A.R. Falsey.
The diagnosis of viral respiratory disease in older adults.
Clin Infect Dis, 50 (2010), pp. 747-751
[75]
R.C. She, C.R. Polage, L.B. Caram, E.W. Taggart, W.C. Hymas, C.W. Woods, et al.
Performance of diagnostic tests to detect respiratory viruses in older adults.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 67 (2010), pp. 246-250
[76]
M.Q. Arens, R.S. Buller, A. Rankin, S. Mason, A. Whetsell, E. Agapov, et al.
Comparison of the Eragen Multi-Code Respiratory Virus Panel with conventional viral testing and real-time multiplex PCR assays for detection of respiratory viruses.
J Clin Microbiol, 48 (2010), pp. 2387-2395
[77]
J. Kuypers, N. Wright, J. Ferrenberg, M.L. Huang, A. Cent, L. Corey, et al.
Comparison of real-time PCR assays with fluorescent-antibody assays for diagnosis of respiratory virus infections in children.
J Clin Microbiol, 44 (2006), pp. 2382-2388
[78]
J.C. Arnold, K.K. Singh, S.A. Spector, M.H. Sawyer.
Undiagnosed respiratory viruses in children.
Pediatrics, 121 (2008), pp. e631-e637
[79]
A. Tiveljung-Lindell, M. Rotzén-Ostlund, S. Gupta, R. Ullstrand, L. Grillner, B. Zweygberg-Wirgart, et al.
Development and implementation of a molecular diagnostic platform for daily rapid detection of 15 respiratory viruses.
J Med Virol, 81 (2009), pp. 167-175
[80]
E. Culebras, C. Betriu, E. Vázquez-Cid, E. López-Varela, S. Rueda, J.J. Picazo.
Detection and genotyping of human respiratory viruses in clinical specimens from children with acute respiratory tract infections.
Rev Esp Quimioter, 26 (2013), pp. 47-50
[81]
J.G. Bartlett, R.F. Breiman, L.A. Mandell, T.M. File.
Community-acquired pneumonia in adults: guidelines for management. The Infectious Diseases Society of America.
Clin Infect Dis, 26 (1998), pp. 811-838
[82]
B. Friis, P. Andersen, E. Brenøe, A. Hornsleth, A. Jensen, F.U. Knudsen, et al.
Antibiotic treatment of pneumonia and bronchiolitis. A prospective randomised study.
Arch Dis Child, 59 (1984), pp. 1038-1045
[83]
S.A. Harper, J.S. Bradley, J.A. Englund, T.M. File, S. Gravenstein, F.G. Hayden, et al.
Seasonal influenza in adults and children – diagnosis, treatment, chemoprophylaxis, and institutional outbreak management: clinical practice guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.
Clin Infect Dis, 48 (2009), pp. 1003-1032
[84]
T.L. Turner, B.T. Kopp, G. Paul, L.C. Landgrave, D. Hayes, R. Thompson.
Respiratory syncytial virus: current and emerging treatment options.
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res, 6 (2014), pp. 217-225
[85]
V.C. Cheng, B.S. Tang, A.K. Wu, C.M. Chu, K.Y. Yuen.
Medical treatment of viral pneumonia including SARS in immunocompetent adult.
J Infect, 49 (2004), pp. 262-273
[86]
A. Moscona.
Neuraminidase inhibitors for influenza.
N Engl J Med, 353 (2005), pp. 1363-1373
[87]
L. Kaiser, C. Wat, T. Mills, P. Mahoney, P. Ward, F. Hayden.
Impact of oseltamivir treatment on influenza-related lower respiratory tract complications and hospitalizations.
Ann Intern Med, 163 (2003), pp. 1667-1672
[88]
H. Yu, Q. Liao, Y. Yuan, L. Zhou, N. Xiang, Y. Huai, et al.
Effectiveness of oseltamivir on disease progression and viral RNA shedding in patients with mild pandemic 2009 influenza A H1N1: opportunistic retrospective study of medical charts in China.
BMJ, 341 (2010), pp. c4779
[89]
Y. Shobugawa, R. Saito, I. Sato, T. Kawashima, C. Dapat, I.C. Dapat, et al.
Clinical effectiveness of neuraminidase inhibitors – oseltamivir, zanamivir, laninamivir, and peramivir – for treatment of influenza A(H3N2) and A(H1N1)pdm09 infection: an observational study in the 2010–2011 influenza season in Japan.
J Infect Chemother, 18 (2012), pp. 858-864
[90]
K. Wang, M. Shun-Shin, P. Gill, R. Perera, A. Harnden.
Neuraminidase inhibitors for preventing and treating influenza in children (published trials only).
Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 4 (2012), pp. Cd002744
[91]
A. Watanabe, S.C. Chang, M.J. Kim, D.W. Chu, Y. Ohashi, MARVEL Study Group.
Long-acting neuraminidase inhibitor laninamivir octanoate versus oseltamivir for treatment of influenza: a double-blind, randomized, noninferiority clinical trial.
Clin Infect Dis, 51 (2010), pp. 1167-1175
[92]
T. Jefferson, V. Demicheli, C. di Pietrantonj, D. Rivetti.
Amantadine and rimantadine for influenza A in adults.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2 (2006), pp. Cd001169
[93]
E. Król, M. Rychłowska, B. Szewczyk.
Antivirals – current trends in fighting influenza.
Acta Biochim Pol, 61 (2014), pp. 495-504
[94]
C. Simmons, J. Farrar.
Insights into inflammation and influenza.
N Engl J Med, 359 (2008), pp. 1621-1623
[95]
K. Ventre, A. Randolph.
WITHDRAWN. Ribavirin for respiratory syncytial virus infection of the lower respiratory tract in infants and young children.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 5 (2010), pp. Cd000181
[96]
J.R. Marcelin, J.W. Wilson, R.R. Razonable.
Mayo Clinic Hematology/Oncology and Transplant Infectious Diseases Services. Oral ribavirin therapy for respiratory syncytial virus infections in moderately to severely immunocompromised patients.
Transpl Infect Dis, 16 (2014), pp. 242-250
[97]
H.L. Fuller, C.B. del Mar.
WITHDRAWN. Immunoglobulin treatment for respiratory syncytial virus infection.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 9 (2010), pp. Cd004883
[98]
American Academy of Pediatrics Subcommittee on Diagnosis and Management of Bronchiolitis.
Diagnosis and management of bronchiolitis.
Pediatrics, 118 (2006), pp. 1774-1793
[99]
S.M. Currie, E.G. Findlay, B.J. McHugh, A. Mackellar, T. Man, D. Macmillan, et al.
The human cathelicidin LL-37 has antiviral activity against respiratory syncytial virus.
[100]
L. Li, C.H. Yu, H.Z. Ying, J.M. Yu.
Antiviral effects of modified dingchuan decoction against respiratory syncytial virus infection in vitro and in an immunosuppressive mouse model.
J Ethnopharmacol, 147 (2013), pp. 238-244
[101]
J.K. Louie, A.E. Kajon, M. Holodniy, L. Guardia-LaBar, B. Lee, A.M. Petru, et al.
Severe pneumonia due to adenovirus serotype 14: a new respiratory threat.
Clin Infect Dis, 46 (2008), pp. 421-425
[102]
P. Hopkins, K. McNeil, F. Kermeen, M. Musk, E. McQueen, I. Mackay, et al.
Human metapneumovirus in lung transplant recipients and comparison to respiratory syncytial virus.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 178 (2008), pp. 876-881
[103]
H.A. Rotbart, A.D. Webster, Pleconaril Treatment Registry Group.
Treatment of potentially life-threatening enterovirus infections with pleconaril.
Clin Infect Dis, 32 (2001), pp. 228-235
[104]
C.Y. Frangides, I. Pneumatikos.
Varicella-zoster virus pneumonia in adults: report of 14 cases and review of the literature.
Eur J Intern Med, 15 (2004), pp. 364-370
[105]
T. Jefferson, R. Foxlee, C. del Mar, L. Dooley, E. Ferroni, B. Hewak, et al.
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses: systematic review.
[106]
D. Bell, A. Nicoll, K. Fukuda, P. Horby, A. Monto, F. Hayden, World Health Organization Writing Group, et al.
Non-pharmaceutical interventions for pandemic influenza, national and community measures.
Emerg Infect Dis, 12 (2006), pp. 88-94
[107]
M.T. Osterholm, N.S. Kelley, A. Sommer, E.A. Belongia.
Efficacy and effectiveness of influenza vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lancet Infect Dis, 12 (2012), pp. 36-44
[108]
B. Michiels, F. Govaerts, R. Remmen, E. Vermeire, S. Coenen.
A systematic review of the evidence on the effectiveness and risks of inactivated influenza vaccines in different target groups.
Vaccine, 29 (2011), pp. 9159-9170
[109]
T. Jefferson, A. Rivetti, C. di Pietrantonj, V. Demicheli, E. Ferroni.
Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy children.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 8 (2012), pp. Cd004879
[110]
T. Jefferson, D. Rivetti, A. Rivetti, M. Rudin, C. di Pietrantonj, V. Demicheli.
Efficacy and effectiveness of influenza vaccines in elderly people: a systematic review.
Lancet, 366 (2005), pp. 1165-1174
[111]
L. Salleras, M.C. Saenz, J. Castrodeza, J.R. de Juanes, M.P. Arrazola.
Consenso sobre vacunaciones del adulto de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Preventiva Salud Pública e Higiene: Vacunación antigripal. Gripe epidémica.
Vacunas, 11 (2010), pp. 46-55
[112]
R. Welliver, A.S. Monto, O. Carewicz, E. Schatteman, M. Hassman, J. Hedrick, et al.
Effectiveness of oseltamivir in preventing influenza in household contacts: a randomized controlled trial.
JAMA, 285 (2001), pp. 748-754
[113]
T. Andabaka, J.W. Nickerson, M.X. Rojas-Reyes, J.D. Rueda, V. Bacic Vrca, B. Barsic.
Monoclonal antibody for reducing the risk of respiratory syncytial virus infection in children.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 4 (2013), pp. Cd006602

Please cite this article as: Galván JM, Rajas O, Aspa J. Revisión sobre las infecciones no bacterianas del aparato respiratorio: neumonías víricas. Arch Bronconeumol. 2015;51:590–597.

Copyright © 2014. SEPAR
Idiomas
Archivos de Bronconeumología (English Edition)

Subscribe to our newsletter

Article options
Tools
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

es en
Política de cookies Cookies policy
Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para mejorar nuestros servicios y mostrarle publicidad relacionada con sus preferencias mediante el análisis de sus hábitos de navegación. Si continua navegando, consideramos que acepta su uso. Puede cambiar la configuración u obtener más información aquí. To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here.