Journal Information
Vol. 44. Issue 9.
Pages 493-498 (January 2008)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 44. Issue 9.
Pages 493-498 (January 2008)
Review Article
Full text access
Positron Emission Tomography for the Study of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules
Visits
4546
Iván Márquez Rodasa, Javier de Miguel Díezb,
Corresponding author
jmiguel.hgugm@salud.madrid.org

Correspondencia: Dr J. de Miguel Díez Servicio de Neumología Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón Dr. Esquerdo, 46 28007 Madrid, Spain
, José Luis Álvarez-Salac
a Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Departamento de Fisiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
b Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
c Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics

Solitary pulmonary nodules are a major clinical challenge for all doctors involved in their study. The aim is always to avoid missing malignant lesions but also to avoid performing unnecessary diagnostic tests. The most recent research suggests that in the near future chest computed tomography will become even more widely used for the early detection of lung cancer. If this occurs, there is likely to be a marked increase in the number of solitary pulmonary nodules detected, making it essential to develop techniques that enable us to manage this problem with an optimal risk-benefit ratio. We review the underlying principles of positron emission tomography and the advances that have been made in its use for the study of solitary pulmonary nodules. In addition, we discuss the possible causes of false positives and negatives in this technique and the strategies aimed at increasing diagnostic yield.

Key words:
Solitary pulmonary nodule
Positron emission tomography
Diagnostic yield

El nódulo pulmonar solitario (NPS) es un reto clínico importante para todo médico implicado en su estudio. El objetivo se cifra siempre en impedir que una lesión maligna pase inadvertida, pero también en evitar que se realicen pruebas diagnósticas innecesarias. Si en el futuro inmediato se generaliza todavía más, como parecen indicar las investigaciones más recientes, el uso de la tomografía computarizada de tórax como método de detección precoz del cáncer de pulmón, es probable que se produzca un notable aumento del número de NPS diagnosticados. En tal caso se haría imprescindible desarrollar técnicas que permitan abordar este problema con una óptima relación riesgo-beneficio. En este trabajo se revisan los fundamentos y los avances que se han producido en el uso de la tomografía por emisión de positrones como técnica de estudio del NPS. Se discuten, asimismo, las causas que explican los posibles falsos positivos y negativos de la prueba, así como las estrategias dirigidas a incrementar la rentabilidad diagnóstica de este procedimiento.

Palabras clave:
Nódulo pulmonar solitario
Tomografía por emisión de positrones
Rentabilidad diagnóstica
Full text is only aviable in PDF
References
[1]
D Ost, AM Fein, SH Feinsilver.
The solitary pulmonary nodule.
N Engl J Med, 348 (2003), pp. 2535-2542
[2]
T Bury, A Dowlati, P Paulus, JL Corhay, T Benoit, JM Kayembe, et al.
Evaluation of the solitary pulmonary nodule by positron emission tomography imaging.
Eur Respir J, 9 (1996), pp. 410-414
[3]
SJ Swensen, MD Silverstein, DM Ilstrup, CD Schleck, ES Edell.
The probability of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules. Application to small radiologically indeterminate nodules.
Arch Intern Med, 157 (1997), pp. 849-855
[4]
The International Early Lung Cancer Action Program investigators.
Survival of patients with stage I lung cancer detected on CT screening.
N Engl J Med, 355 (2006), pp. 1763-1771
[5]
KB Nolop, CG Rhodes, LH Brudin, RP Beaney, T Krausz, T Jones, et al.
Glucose utilization in vivo by human pulmonary neoplasms.
Cancer, 60 (1987), pp. 2682-2689
[6]
HW Praüer, WA Weber, W Römer, T Treuman, SI Ziegler, M Schwaiger.
Controlled prospective study of positron emission tomography using the glucose analogue 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose in the evaluation of pulmonary nodules.
Br J Surg, 85 (1998), pp. 1506-1511
[7]
JA Richter, W Torre, C Gámez, JM Aramendía, A Crespo, A Nicolás, et al.
Valor del PET-18FDG en el cáncer de pulmón.
Med Clin (Barc), 113 (1999), pp. 567-571
[8]
GJ Herder, RP Golding, OS Hoekstra, EF Comans, GJ Teule, PE Postmus, et al.
The performance of 18-F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in small solitary pulmonary nodules.
Eur J Nucl Mol Imaging, 31 (2004), pp. 1231-1236
[9]
G Ruiz Hernández, A González, R de Juan, H Verea, LM Callol, M Domper, et al.
Exactitud diagnóstica del análisis semicuantitativo de la tomografía por emisión de positrones en lesiones pulmonares radiológicamente indeterminadas.
Rev Esp Med Nucl, 21 (2002), pp. 403-409
[10]
MK Gould, CC Maclean, WG Kuschner, CE Rydzak, DK Owens.
Accuracy of positron emission tomography for diagnosis of pulmonary nodules and mass lesions. A meta-analysis.
JAMA, 285 (2001), pp. 936-937
[11]
C García de Llanos, P Cabrera Navarro, J Freixinet Gilart, P Rodríguez Suárez, M Hussein Serhald, T Romero Saavedra.
Textiloma intratorácico interpretado como carcinoma broncogénico. Otro falso positivo de la tomografía por emisión de positrones.
Arch Bronconeumol, 43 (2007), pp. 292-294
[12]
NA Dewan, NC Gupta, LS Redepenning, JJ Phalen, MP Frick.
Diagnostic efficacy of PET-FDG imaging in solitary pulmonary nodules. Potential role in evaluation and management.
Chest, 104 (1993), pp. 997-1002
[13]
M Hickeson, M Yun, A Matthies, H Zhuang, LE Adam, L Lacorte, et al.
Use of a corrected standardized uptake value based on the lesion size on CT permits accurate characterization of lung nodules on FDG-PET.
Eur J Nucl Med, 29 (2002), pp. 1639-1647
[14]
B Ojha, SC Bartley, S Gundlapalli, JM Mountz.
Effect of dietary intake before F-18 FDG positron emission tomographic scanning on the evaluation of a solitary pulmonary nodule.
Clin Nucl Med, 26 (2001), pp. 908-909
[15]
AS Bryant, RJ Cerfolio.
The maximum standardized uptake values on integrated FDG-PET/CT is useful in differentiating benign from malignant pulmonary nodules.
Ann Thorac Surg, 82 (2006), pp. 1016-1020
[16]
BS Sabloff, MT Truong, II Wistuba, JJ Erasmus.
Bronchioalveolar cell carcinoma: radiologic appearance and dilemmas in the assessment of response.
Clin Lung Cancer, 6 (2004), pp. 108-112
[17]
K Higashi, Y Ueda, A Sakurai, XM Wang, L Xu, M Murakami, et al.
Correlation of glut-1 glucose transporter expression with [18F]FDG uptake in non-small cell lung cancer.
Eur J Nucl Med, 27 (2000), pp. 1778-1785
[18]
K Higashi, Y Ueda, H Seki, K Yuasa, M Oguchi, T Noguchi, et al.
Fluorine-18-FDG PET imaging is negative in bronchioloalveolar lung carcinoma.
J Nucl Med, 39 (1998), pp. 1016-1020
[19]
B Eriksson, H Örlefors, K Oberg, A Sundin, M Bergström, B Långström.
Developments in PET for the detection of endocrine tumors.
Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab, 19 (2005), pp. 311-324
[20]
JJ Erasmus, HP McAdams, EF Patz Jr, RE Coleman, V Ahuja, PC Goodman.
Evaluation of primary pulmonary carcinoid tumors using FDG-PET.
AJR, 170 (1998), pp. 1369-1373
[21]
A Muñoz Llarena, S Carrera Revilla, A Gil-Negrete Laborda, J Pac Ferrer, R Barceló Galíndez, G López Vivanco.
Factores pronósticos en metástasis pulmonares resecables de carcinoma colorrectal.
Arch Bronconeumol, 43 (2007), pp. 309-316
[22]
K Higashi, I Matsunari, Y Ueda, R Ikeda, J Guo, M Oguchi, et al.
Value of whole body FDG-PET in management of lung cancer.
Ann Nucl Med, 17 (2003), pp. 1-14
[23]
K Higashi, Y Ueda, R Ikeda, Y Kodama, J Guo, I Matsunari, et al.
P-glycoprotein expression is associated with FDG uptake and cell differentiation in patients with untreated lung cancer.
Nucl Med Commun, 25 (2004), pp. 19-27
[24]
GJ Herder, H Van Tinteren, RP Golding, PJ Kostense, EF Comans, EF Smit, et al.
Clinical prediction model to characterize pulmonary nodules. Validation and added value of 18F-fluorodeoxy-glucose positron emission tomography.
Chest, 128 (2005), pp. 2490-2496
[25]
NA Dewan, CJ Shehan, SD Reer, LS Gobar, WJ Scott, K Ryschon.
Likelihood of malignancy in a solitary pulmonary nodule. Comparison of Bayesian analysis and results of FDG-PET scan.
Chest, 112 (1997), pp. 416-422
[26]
H Zhuang, M Pourdehnad, ES Lambright, AJ Yamamoto, M Lanuti, P Li, et al.
Dual time point 18F-FDG PET imaging for differentiating malignant from inflammatory processes.
J Nucl Med, 42 (2001), pp. 1412-1417
[27]
Y Nakamoto, KR Zasadny, H Minn, RL Wahl.
Reproducibility of common semi-quantitative parameters for evaluating lung cancer glucose metabolism with positron emission tomography using 2-deoxy-2-18F-fluoro-D-glucose.
Mol Imaging Biol, 4 (2002), pp. 171-178
[28]
A Maldonado, FJ González-Alenda, M Alonso, JM Sierra.
Utilidad de la tomografía por emisión de positrones-tomografía computarizada (PET-TC) en neumología.
Arch Bronconeumol, 43 (2007), pp. 562-572
[29]
SK Kim, M Allen-Auerbach, J Goldin, BJ Fueger, M Dahlbom, M Brown, et al.
Accuracy of PET/CT in characterization of solitary pulmonary lesions.
J Nucl Med, 48 (2007), pp. 214-220
Copyright © 2008. Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica (SEPAR)
Archivos de Bronconeumología
Article options
Tools

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?