was read the article
array:24 [ "pii" => "S1579212920302093" "issn" => "15792129" "doi" => "10.1016/j.arbr.2020.08.003" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2020-10-01" "aid" => "2409" "copyright" => "SEPAR" "copyrightAnyo" => "2020" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Arch Bronconeumol. 2020;56:637-42" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "es" => array:19 [ "pii" => "S030028962030048X" "issn" => "03002896" "doi" => "10.1016/j.arbres.2020.01.016" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2020-10-01" "aid" => "2409" "copyright" => "SEPAR" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Arch Bronconeumol. 2020;56:637-42" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "es" => array:14 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original</span>" "titulo" => "Aspiración manual versus aspiración digital en el tratamiento inicial del neumotórax espontáneo primario: estudio AMVADI. Ensayo clínico aleatorizado" "tienePdf" => "es" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "es" "tieneResumen" => array:3 [ 0 => "es" 1 => "es" 2 => "en" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "637" "paginaFinal" => "642" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "en" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Manual Versus Digital Aspiration for First-Line Treatment of Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax. The AMVADI Study: A Randomized Clinical Trial" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "es" => true "en" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 1 "multimedia" => array:5 [ "identificador" => "fig0020" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => false "mostrarDisplay" => true "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "fx1.jpeg" "Alto" => 885 "Ancho" => 1333 "Tamanyo" => 70209 ] ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "Borja Aguinagalde, Jon Zabaleta, Arantza Fernández-Monge, Iker Lopez, José M. Izquierdo, Jose A. Redin, David López, Jose Ignacio Emparanza" "autores" => array:8 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Borja" "apellidos" => "Aguinagalde" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Jon" "apellidos" => "Zabaleta" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Arantza" "apellidos" => "Fernández-Monge" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Iker" "apellidos" => "Lopez" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "José M." "apellidos" => "Izquierdo" ] 5 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Jose A." "apellidos" => "Redin" ] 6 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "David" "apellidos" => "López" ] 7 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Jose Ignacio" "apellidos" => "Emparanza" ] ] ] ] "resumen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "titulo" => "Graphical abstract" "clase" => "graphical" "resumen" => "<span id="abst0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><p id="spar0005" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall"><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0020"></elsevierMultimedia></p></span>" ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "en" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S1579212920302093" "doi" => "10.1016/j.arbr.2020.08.003" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1579212920302093?idApp=UINPBA00003Z" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S030028962030048X?idApp=UINPBA00003Z" "url" => "/03002896/0000005600000010/v2_202010270642/S030028962030048X/v2_202010270642/es/main.assets" ] ] "itemSiguiente" => array:19 [ "pii" => "S157921292030210X" "issn" => "15792129" "doi" => "10.1016/j.arbr.2020.08.004" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2020-10-01" "aid" => "2426" "copyright" => "SEPAR" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Arch Bronconeumol. 2020;56:643-50" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "en" => array:13 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original Article</span>" "titulo" => "Reactivity study of a biodegradable polydioxanone tracheal stent in a rabbit model" "tienePdf" => "en" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "en" 1 => "es" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "643" "paginaFinal" => "650" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Stent</span> traqueal biodegradable de polidioxanona. Estudio de la reactividad en conejo" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "en" => true "es" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:8 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Fig. 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 1038 "Ancho" => 2336 "Tamanyo" => 130043 ] ] "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at0005" "detalle" => "Fig. " "rol" => "short" ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0005" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Distribution of animals in study groups.</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "Sergio Rodriguez-Zapater, Carolina Serrano-Casorran, José A. Guirola, Sandra Lopez-Minguez, Cristina Bonastre, Miguel A. de Gregorio" "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Sergio" "apellidos" => "Rodriguez-Zapater" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Carolina" "apellidos" => "Serrano-Casorran" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "José A." "apellidos" => "Guirola" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Sandra" "apellidos" => "Lopez-Minguez" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Cristina" "apellidos" => "Bonastre" ] 5 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Miguel A." "apellidos" => "de Gregorio" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "es" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S0300289620300685" "doi" => "10.1016/j.arbres.2020.02.008" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S0300289620300685?idApp=UINPBA00003Z" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S157921292030210X?idApp=UINPBA00003Z" "url" => "/15792129/0000005600000010/v1_202010020808/S157921292030210X/v1_202010020808/en/main.assets" ] "itemAnterior" => array:18 [ "pii" => "S1579212920302457" "issn" => "15792129" "doi" => "10.1016/j.arbr.2020.01.007" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2020-10-01" "aid" => "2404" "copyright" => "SEPAR" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Arch Bronconeumol. 2020;56:630-6" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => false "ES2" => false "LATM" => false ] "gratuito" => false "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "en" => array:14 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original Article</span>" "titulo" => "Long Non-Coding RNA NANCI/NKX2-1 Duplex Impacts Prognosis in Stage I Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer" "tienePdf" => "en" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "tieneResumen" => array:3 [ 0 => "en" 1 => "en" 2 => "es" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "630" "paginaFinal" => "636" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "La combinación de NANCI/NKX2-1 de ARN no codificante de cadena larga afecta al pronóstico del cáncer de pulmón de células no pequeñas en estadio <span class="elsevierStyleSmallCaps">i</span>" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "en" => true "es" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 1 "multimedia" => array:5 [ "identificador" => "fig0020" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => false "mostrarDisplay" => true "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "fx1.jpeg" "Alto" => 675 "Ancho" => 1333 "Tamanyo" => 72362 ] ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "Jorge Moisés, Alfons Navarro, Joan Josep Castellano, Nuria Viñolas, Laureano Molins, Jordi Canals, Bing Han, Jara Martín, José Ramirez, Gerard Frigola, Ramón María Marrades, Mariano Monzó" "autores" => array:12 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Jorge" "apellidos" => "Moisés" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Alfons" "apellidos" => "Navarro" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Joan Josep" "apellidos" => "Castellano" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Nuria" "apellidos" => "Viñolas" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Laureano" "apellidos" => "Molins" ] 5 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Jordi" "apellidos" => "Canals" ] 6 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Bing" "apellidos" => "Han" ] 7 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Jara" "apellidos" => "Martín" ] 8 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "José" "apellidos" => "Ramirez" ] 9 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Gerard" "apellidos" => "Frigola" ] 10 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Ramón María" "apellidos" => "Marrades" ] 11 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "Mariano" "apellidos" => "Monzó" ] ] ] ] "resumen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "titulo" => "Graphical abstract" "clase" => "graphical" "resumen" => "<span id="abst0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><p id="spar0075" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall"><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0020"></elsevierMultimedia></p></span>" ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1579212920302457?idApp=UINPBA00003Z" "url" => "/15792129/0000005600000010/v1_202010020808/S1579212920302457/v1_202010020808/en/main.assets" ] "en" => array:21 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Original Article</span>" "titulo" => "Manual versus digital aspiration for first-line treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax. The AMVADI study: a randomized clinical trial" "tieneTextoCompleto" => true "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "637" "paginaFinal" => "642" ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "autoresLista" => "Borja Aguinagalde, Jon Zabaleta, Arantza Fernández-Monge, Iker Lopez, José M. Izquierdo, Jose A. Redin, David López, Jose Ignacio Emparanza" "autores" => array:8 [ 0 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Borja" "apellidos" => "Aguinagalde" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] ] ] 1 => array:4 [ "nombre" => "Jon" "apellidos" => "Zabaleta" "email" => array:1 [ 0 => "jon.zabaletajimenez@osakidetza.eus" ] "referencia" => array:2 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] 1 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "*" "identificador" => "cor0005" ] ] ] 2 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Arantza" "apellidos" => "Fernández-Monge" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] ] ] 3 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Iker" "apellidos" => "Lopez" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] ] ] 4 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "José M." "apellidos" => "Izquierdo" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] ] ] 5 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Jose A." "apellidos" => "Redin" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">b</span>" "identificador" => "aff0010" ] ] ] 6 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "David" "apellidos" => "López" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">b</span>" "identificador" => "aff0010" ] ] ] 7 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "Jose Ignacio" "apellidos" => "Emparanza" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">c</span>" "identificador" => "aff0015" ] ] ] ] "afiliaciones" => array:3 [ 0 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Servicio de Cirugía Torácica, Hospital Universitario Donostia, Donostia, Gipuzkoa, Spain" "etiqueta" => "a" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] 1 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Servicio de Urgencias Generales, Hospital Universitario Donostia, Donostia, Gipuzkoa, Spain" "etiqueta" => "b" "identificador" => "aff0010" ] 2 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Servicio de Epidemiología Clínica, Hospital Universitario Donostia, Donostia, Gipuzkoa, Spain" "etiqueta" => "c" "identificador" => "aff0015" ] ] "correspondencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "cor0005" "etiqueta" => "⁎" "correspondencia" => "Corresponding author." ] ] ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Aspiración manual versus aspiración digital en el tratamiento inicial del neumotórax espontáneo primario: estudio AMVADI. Ensayo clínico aleatorizado" ] ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:8 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Fig. 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 2193 "Ancho" => 2500 "Tamanyo" => 327862 ] ] "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at0005" "detalle" => "Fig. " "rol" => "short" ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0005" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Recruitment and randomization process.</p>" ] ] ] "textoCompleto" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSections"><span id="sec0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0065">Introduction</span><p id="par0005" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Pneumothorax is defined as the presence of air in the pleural space, and can be acquired (iatrogenic and traumatic) or spontaneous, depending on its etiology. These categories are, in turn, divided into primary (no obvious cause), secondary (underlying pleuropulmonary disease as an obvious cause), and catamenial (associated with the menstrual cycle).</p><p id="par0010" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">It is difficult to determine the real extent of the incidence of primary spontaneous pneumothorax, although figures in the literature suggest that the incidence is 16.7/100,000 per year in men and 5.8/100,000 per year in women, according to Gupta et al.,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0005"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1</span></a> or 7.4–18/100,000 per year (adjusted for age) in men and 1.2–6/100,000 per year (adjusted for age) in women, according to Noppen and De Keukeleire.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0010"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a></p><p id="par0015" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The initial treatment of the first episode of primary spontaneous pneumothorax ranges from observation<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0015"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">3,4</span></a> to surgery.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0025"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5,6</span></a> However, in cases of large pneumothorax or unstable patients, the clinical practice guidelines recommend active ambulatory treatment.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0035"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7</span></a> Needle aspiration and the use of external devices such as minichest tubes or Heimlich valves offer greater advantages in terms of avoiding admissions without increasing recurrence.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0035"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7–10</span></a>. In spite of this, other guidelines do not include this approach as the first line of treatment,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0055"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">11</span></a> and in other studies needle aspiration is presented as a therapeutic strategy with low adherence.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0060"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">12,13</span></a></p><p id="par0020" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Our aim in this study was to demonstrate the advantages of digital needle aspiration (by reducing the human factor of aspiration) versus standard manual aspiration in order to improve acceptance and increase the uptake of this strategy.</p></span><span id="sec0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0070">Materials and methods</span><span id="sec0015" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0075">Study design and participants</span><p id="par0025" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The AMVADI study is a parallel randomized trial with a 1:1 randomization and blind evaluation. The clinical trial meets CONSORT standards for parallel-group randomized trials.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0070"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">14</span></a></p><p id="par0030" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The AMVADI study was registered under number ISRCTN46137912 in the ISRCTN BioMed Central Registry.</p><p id="par0035" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The study subjects were patients with a first episode of primary spontaneous pneumothorax (presence of air in the pleural space, without prior trauma or iatrogenesis and without underlying pleuropulmonary disease) in whom active treatment with needle aspiration was indicated.</p></span><span id="sec0020" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0080">Inclusion criteria</span><p id="par0040" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Patients with a first episode of primary spontaneous pneumothorax with symptoms (uncontrolled pain or dyspnea) or lung collapse greater than 20% as measured by the Light index.</p></span><span id="sec0025" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0085">Exclusion criteria</span><p id="par0045" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall"><ul class="elsevierStyleList" id="lis0005"><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0005"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">•</span><p id="par0050" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Acquired pneumothorax (traumatic or iatrogenic).</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0010"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">•</span><p id="par0055" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Suspicion of secondary pneumothorax based on clinical and radiological criteria.</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0015"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">•</span><p id="par0060" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Suspicion of catamenial pneumothorax based on clinical and radiological criteria.</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0020"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">•</span><p id="par0065" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Previous episodes.</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0025"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">•</span><p id="par0070" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Bilateral pneumothorax.</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0030"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">•</span><p id="par0075" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Tension pneumothorax.</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0035"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">•</span><p id="par0080" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Immunosuppression.</p></li></ul></p><p id="par0085" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Interventions in both groups were performed by staff of the general emergency department (where manual needle aspiration has been performed since 1997). Both groups are described below.</p></span><span id="sec0030" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0090">Control group</span><p id="par0090" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">A Pleuropath® pleural tube was placed in the second intercostal space, clavicular midline. After placement, a 50 cc syringe was used to manually aspirate up to 3500 cc or until air was no longer aspirated (whichever occurred first). The chest tube was closed and a chest X-ray was performed at 6 h (a 4−12 h range was accepted to ensure the patient's night rest). If lung expansion or marginal apical pneumothorax was observed on the X-ray, the drain was removed and the patient was discharged from hospital. If it persisted on X-ray, the tube was connected to a water seal and the patient was admitted to the hospital.</p></span><span id="sec0035" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0095">Experimental group</span><p id="par0095" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The procedure was the same as in the control group, with the difference that once the Pleuropath® was placed, it was connected to a digital suction system at ↓10 cmH<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span>O aspiration pressure until the flow ceased (two measurements separated by 5 min. with 0 ml/min flow) or maximum 30 min. (whichever occurred first). If aspiration persisted for more than 30 min, the patient was admitted. If aspiration stopped before 30 min, the chest tube was closed and a chest X-ray was performed at 6 h (a 4−12 h range was accepted to ensure the patient's night rest). If lung expansion or marginal apical pneumothorax was observed on the X-ray, the drain was removed and patient was discharged from hospital. If it persisted on X-ray, the tube was connected to a water seal and the patient was admitted to the hospital.</p><p id="par0100" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The suction system used was Thopaz®.</p></span><span id="sec0040" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0100">Study variables</span><p id="par0105" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Primary outcome variables</span>. Primary outcome variables were immediate success and admission to hospital. Immediate success was defined as aspiration (manual or digital), closure of the chest tube followed by removal of the tube and discharge home.</p><p id="par0110" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Secondary outcome variables</span>. Variables such as days of admission, need for surgery, recurrence, and readmission within the first 30 days were also measured.</p><p id="par0115" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleItalic">Demographic variables</span>. Data were collected on the age of the participants, sex, weight, height, smoking history, pneumothorax side, and percentage collapse measured by the Light index.</p><p id="par0120" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">An anonymous survey was also administered to the staff of the emergency department who carried out the needle aspiration to ascertain the number of aspirations performed and the preferences for use.</p></span><span id="sec0045" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0105">Recruitment and sample size</span><p id="par0125" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">All subjects treated who met the study criteria and gave informed consent were included in the study.</p><p id="par0130" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">It was estimated that between 60 and 100 patients would be recruited during the study period (3 years). This sample size was guided by the volume of care and the calculated volume of the previous retrospective study. A formal sample size calculation was not performed because the efficiency of the automatic drainage system was entirely unknown.</p></span><span id="sec0050" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0110">Randomization</span><p id="par0135" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">A computer-based randomization sequence was developed. This sequence was kept in the clinical epidemiology department of the Hospital Universitario Donostia, so that the investigator recruiting the patients did not know in advance to which group the patient would be assigned (hidden randomization sequence). Once the patients had been evaluated by the general emergency staff, and if they met the criteria for inclusion in the study and signed the consent form, an opaque envelope was opened showing the intervention to be performed (manual [control group] or digital [intervention group]).</p></span><span id="sec0055" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0115">Masking</span><p id="par0140" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Due to the characteristics of the interventions, masking was not possible, but if there was any doubt about resolution on the follow-up X-ray, a member of the thoracic surgery department was asked to decide. This surgical staff member was unaware of the patient’s assigned group.</p></span><span id="sec0060" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0120">Statistics</span><p id="par0145" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">A descriptive analysis of variables using mean and standard deviation for quantitative variables and absolute and relative frequencies for categorical variables was performed. The distribution of the variable of interest among the 2 groups (manual aspiration and digital aspiration) was analyzed using the Chi-square test (χ<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>) and Student’s <span class="elsevierStyleItalic">t</span>-test for categorical and quantitative variables, respectively. The impact of the type of intervention on time to recurrence was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier test and log-rank test. Version 14.1 of the STATA® statistical program was used for this purpose.</p></span><span id="sec0065" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0125">Ethical considerations</span><p id="par0150" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The risk was similar in both the intervention group and the control group. However, as this is an experimental study, it required the approval of the Guipúzcoa Clinical Research Ethics Committee (CREC) (see Annex). The patients, or in the case of minors, their parents or guardians, were informed of the study and asked to sign the informed consent. The collected data were processed and used in accordance with good clinical practice guidelines and the principles of the Data Protection Law.</p></span></span><span id="sec0070" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0130">Results</span><p id="par0155" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Over a period of 38 months (November 16, 2011 to January 7, 2015), 72 patients with a first episode of primary spontaneous pneumothorax were initially included as potential candidates for randomization. After the exclusion criteria were checked, 5 were excluded and the remaining 67 were included in the study. Of these, 36 were assigned to the control group and 31 to the intervention group. <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0005">Fig. 1</a> shows how patients included in the study were recruited and randomized.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0005"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0160" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">No patients were lost to follow-up. Seven months after study inclusion was complete, all patients were contacted to verify their status, so the follow-up range is between 7 and 45 months.</p><p id="par0165" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The characteristics presented by patients in both groups (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0005">Table 1</a>) were analyzed first, and it was determined that they do not differ in age, sex, pneumothorax side, body mass index (BMI), smoking habit, or pack-year index, as expected in an RCT. These data revealed that the typical patient in our study was a young male, smoker or former smoker, with a right pneumothorax. Indeed, this pattern coincides with the typical patient with spontaneous idiopathic pneumothorax.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0005"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0170" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Secondly, the main study variables were analyzed (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0010">Table 2</a>). Resolution with ambulatory management was observed in 58% of the patients, distributed equally among both groups. Neither the recurrence rate, readmission rate, nor days of admission show statistically significant differences between the groups. Need for surgery was indicated according to the criteria normally used in the hospital for primary spontaneous pneumothorax (recurrence, prolonged air leak > 5 days, at-risk professions). Of the 18 patients who underwent surgery, 12 were for ipsilateral recurrence and 6 for prolonged air leak. Surgical procedures included bullectomy with abrasion on 14 occasions and bullectomy with pleurectomy on 4 occasions. Postoperative recurrence rate was 5.5% (1 case).</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0010"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0175" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall"><a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0010">Fig. 2</a> describes the management of randomized study patients.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0010"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0180" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">An analysis of recurrences during follow-up was also performed using the Kaplan-Meier test. <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0015">Fig. 3</a> shows that the patterns of both graphs are similar throughout the follow-up period.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0015"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0185" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The absolute risk of success or resolution of the episode without admission in the digital aspiration group in our study was 58%. With our sample size, this means that with a 95% confidence interval the success of this technique can be estimated at between 34% and 91%.</p><p id="par0190" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The study was not designed as a non-inferiority study, but had we performed such an analysis we would have had to establish a minimum value in order to consider the technique successful. We could assume success to mean that in one-third of patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax the condition is resolved without admission, as occurred in our retrospective cohort study. Based on this assumption, taking the lowest value of the confidence interval for digital aspiration (34%) we would be above the minimum value, so in a no-difference study, digital aspiration would be at least as effective as manual aspiration.</p><p id="par0195" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">An anonymous satisfaction survey was conducted among emergency department staff who performed the needle aspiration. Twenty professionals answered the question of how many aspirations they performed each year and whether they felt more comfortable with the manual or digital aspiration. A total of 80% of professionals preferred the digital method, and all professionals who performed more than 5 aspirations/year (8 emergency doctors) chose this option.</p></span><span id="sec0075" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0135">Discussion</span><p id="par0200" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Studies are regularly published on the initial treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax, indicating its importance. Treatments for a first episode range from simple observation, ambulatory management with needle aspiration or Heimlich valves, to hospital management with chest drains and surgical intervention.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0015"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">3–11</span></a></p><p id="par0205" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In most published papers, observation is reserved for stable patients with pneumothorax involving a lung collapse of less than 20%. However, some studies question whether pneumothorax size should be the criterion for deciding whether patients with pneumothorax should be observed or treated.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0020"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">4</span></a></p><p id="par0210" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">If active treatment has been decided, it seems clear that there is no difference in recurrences or readmissions between placing a chest tube and admitting a patient and performing ambulatory needle aspiration, while the use of needle aspiration could prevent two-thirds of admissions, as demonstrated by two systematic reviews.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0050"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">10–15</span></a> Another clinical trial with 56 randomized patients subsequently showed very similar results, confirming that needle aspiration does not increase recurrence rates.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0080"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">16</span></a> Unlike other clinical trials, this study recruited patients with traumatic pneumothorax, and this variable was an independent factor for good prognosis at resolution. Female gender was also seen to be an independent factor, with women showing better resolution data than men.</p><p id="par0215" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Even with all the scientific tests available, needle aspiration is rarely undertaken as the first step in the management of pneumothorax in many countries,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0060"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">12,13</span></a> and few emergency departments perform it in Spain. The low reliance on evidence in this setting may be a criticism of the small number of patients enrolled in clinical trials. In fact, the systematic review only retrieved 331 patients from 4 clinical trials.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0050"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">10</span></a> However other trials have continued to corroborate these results,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0080"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">16</span></a> and the lack of evidence supporting an approach other than ambulatory management leads us to think that other factors prevent the implementation of a needle aspiration strategy in hospitals.</p><p id="par0220" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The lack of strict protocols means that needle aspiration is less used. A retrospective cohort study conducted by our group found that hospital admissions could have been avoided in twice as many patients if needle aspiration had been part of routine clinical practice.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0085"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">17</span></a> The human factor was also identified as one of the possible reasons for this reduced uptake, along with the absence of protocols.</p><p id="par0225" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In contrast, in the same hospital with the same emergency department staff, after the AMVADI study has been designed, the decrease in admissions as a result of needle aspiration was the same as that reported in other published papers. In this study, 58% of patients who underwent needle aspiration (manual or digital) were managed in an ambulatory setting without admission.</p><p id="par0230" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The clinical trial failed to demonstrate that eliminating the human factor from aspiration and performing it with a digital device further reduces admissions. If we were to apply a non-inferiority principle, the digital system would have been shown to be not inferior to the manual intervention, with a 95% confidence interval of 31%–91%. In our study both options reduced admissions by 58%, in line with published literature.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0050"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">10–15</span></a> Pneumothorax recurrence data after 7–45 months’ follow-up show reasonable figures ranging from 19% in the digital aspiration group to 22% in the manual aspiration group.</p><p id="par0235" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The limitations of these data must be taken into account: for example, a larger sample size might provide smaller confidence intervals and even reach statistical significance in some of the results. The fact that this is a practical study performed in a single center could make it difficult to extrapolate results to clinical practice. However, in centers where manual needle aspiration is already performed, transition to a digital system should not be a problem if nurses were given a short training course (15−20 min clinical session). The different aspiration techniques of the 2 methods makes it difficult to select the same volume/time criteria for both. However, manual aspiration of up to 3500 cc is the standard volume used in different RCTs<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0085"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">17</span></a> and wall suction in pneumothorax was performed at ↓10 cmH<span class="elsevierStyleInf">2</span>O for 30 min maximum. We also believe that the different protocols do not alter the outcome, as patients with intact pleura are resolved with both protocols, and if the pleura is not intact, the problem will not be resolved with either protocol.</p><p id="par0240" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The digital system is increasingly used as a support technique in thoracic surgery departments. It has proven to be beneficial and convenient for both patients and caregivers. In 1 paper, 15 staff members of the thoracic surgery department in a hospital in Birmingham were asked for feedback on the convenience of using the digital system in patients with diverse surgical conditions; 67% rated it as very good or excellent.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0090"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">18</span></a> Similarly, a survey conducted in the emergency department found that 80% of respondents prefer to use the digital system in routine practice. Among the group of respondents, all physicians performing needle aspiration procedures more than 5 times a year prefer the digital system. Other studies confirm that these systems are useful in the management of pneumothorax in different phases.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0095"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19</span></a> Based on these results, we believe that digital aspiration may facilitate the applicability of this strategy.</p><p id="par0245" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Cost-effectiveness studies show that the implementation of this strategy is of the utmost importance. In a study of 60 consecutive patients with pneumothorax, 48 were aspirated with a pigtail drain, resulting in an estimated reduction in hospitalization costs of 114,000 euros.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0100"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">20</span></a> The economic impact of needle aspiration in England has been analyzed, and estimates show that not performing aspiration in 10% of patients costs the English national health system more than £438,412 per year. The authors also found that application of the ACCP protocol (drainage and admission without needle aspiration) in England would entail an additional annual cost of £3.9 million.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0105"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">21</span></a></p><p id="par0250" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In conclusion, we believe that digital aspiration systems can be an effective alternative and that this approach increases user satisfaction. This could facilitate the expansion and wider implementation of the technique.</p></span><span id="sec0080" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0140">Conflict of interests</span><p id="par0255" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The authors state that they have no conflict of interests.</p></span></span>" "textoCompletoSecciones" => array:1 [ "secciones" => array:10 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "xres1393713" "titulo" => "Abstract" "secciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0005" "titulo" => "Introduction" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0010" "titulo" => "Methods" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0015" "titulo" => "Results" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0020" "titulo" => "Conclusions" ] ] ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1277452" "titulo" => "Keywords" ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "xres1393712" "titulo" => "Resumen" "secciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0025" "titulo" => "Introducción" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0030" "titulo" => "Métodos" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0035" "titulo" => "Resultados" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0040" "titulo" => "Conclusiones" ] ] ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1277451" "titulo" => "Palabras clave" ] 4 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0005" "titulo" => "Introduction" ] 5 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0010" "titulo" => "Materials and methods" "secciones" => array:11 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0015" "titulo" => "Study design and participants" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0020" "titulo" => "Inclusion criteria" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0025" "titulo" => "Exclusion criteria" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0030" "titulo" => "Control group" ] 4 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0035" "titulo" => "Experimental group" ] 5 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0040" "titulo" => "Study variables" ] 6 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0045" "titulo" => "Recruitment and sample size" ] 7 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0050" "titulo" => "Randomization" ] 8 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0055" "titulo" => "Masking" ] 9 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0060" "titulo" => "Statistics" ] 10 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0065" "titulo" => "Ethical considerations" ] ] ] 6 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0070" "titulo" => "Results" ] 7 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0075" "titulo" => "Discussion" ] 8 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0080" "titulo" => "Conflict of interests" ] 9 => array:1 [ "titulo" => "References" ] ] ] "pdfFichero" => "main.pdf" "tienePdf" => true "fechaRecibido" => "2019-11-13" "fechaAceptado" => "2020-01-17" "PalabrasClave" => array:2 [ "en" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Keywords" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1277452" "palabras" => array:4 [ 0 => "Pneumothorax" 1 => "Clinical trial" 2 => "Manual aspiration" 3 => "Digital aspiration" ] ] ] "es" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Palabras clave" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1277451" "palabras" => array:4 [ 0 => "Neumotórax" 1 => "Ensayo clínico" 2 => "Aspiración manual" 3 => "Aspiración digital" ] ] ] ] "tieneResumen" => true "resumen" => array:2 [ "en" => array:3 [ "titulo" => "Abstract" "resumen" => "<span id="abst0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0010">Introduction</span><p id="spar0065" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">The effectiveness of needle aspiration in the initial treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax has been widely studied. The objective of this research was to compare digital with manual aspiration in a randomized clinical trial.</p></span> <span id="abst0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0015">Methods</span><p id="spar0070" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">We designed a blinded parallel-group randomized clinical trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio. The clinical trial is reported in line with the guidelines of the CONSORT group. The primary outcome variables were immediate success and hospital admission, while the secondary outcome measures were relapse, re-admission and need for surgery, and length of hospital stay. A satisfaction survey was also carried out among clinicians who perform these 2 types of aspiration.</p></span> <span id="abst0015" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0020">Results</span><p id="spar0075" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">A total of 67 patients were included in the study (n = 36, control group; n = 31, experimental group) with no losses to follow-up. In both groups, 58% of procedures were immediately successful, avoiding hospital admission. No differences were found in rates of relapse, re-admission, need for surgery, or length of hospital stay. Overall, 80% of clinicians who performed aspiration preferred the digital system, and this preference rose to 100% among clinicians who performed more than 5 procedures a year.</p></span> <span id="abst0020" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0025">Conclusions</span><p id="spar0080" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Both manual and digital aspiration provide good immediate results avoiding hospital admission, while digital drainage is preferred by clinicians responsible for first-line treatment of pneumothorax.</p></span>" "secciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0005" "titulo" => "Introduction" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0010" "titulo" => "Methods" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0015" "titulo" => "Results" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0020" "titulo" => "Conclusions" ] ] ] "es" => array:3 [ "titulo" => "Resumen" "resumen" => "<span id="abst0025" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0035">Introducción</span><p id="spar0085" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">La efectividad de la punción aspiración en el tratamiento inicial del neumotórax espontáneo primario ha sido ampliamente estudiada. El objetivo de este trabajo es comparar la aspiración digital frente a la manual en un ensayo clínico aleatorizado.</p></span> <span id="abst0030" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0040">Métodos</span><p id="spar0090" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Se ha diseñado un ensayo clínico aleatorizado paralelo con ratio 1:1 y evaluación ciega. El ensayo clínico se adapta al estándar del grupo CONSORT. El resultado primario se define como éxito inmediato e ingreso hospitalario, y los secundarios, como recidiva, reingreso, necesidad de cirugía y días de ingreso. Se realiza encuesta de satisfacción entre los profesionales que realizan los dos tipos de punción.</p></span> <span id="abst0035" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0045">Resultados</span><p id="spar0095" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Sesenta y siete pacientes han sido incluidos en el estudio (n = 36 grupo control, n = 31 grupo intervención) con un seguimiento del 100%. Ambos grupos presentan un éxito inmediato del 58%, evitándose el ingreso hospitalario. No se observan diferencias en cuanto a recidiva, reingreso, necesidad de cirugía o días de ingreso. El 80% del personal que realiza la técnica de punción prefiere la aspiración digital, siendo el 100% entre el personal que realiza más de 5 punciones al año.</p></span> <span id="abst0040" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0050">Conclusiones</span><p id="spar0100" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Tanto la punción aspiración manual como la digital ofrecen buenos resultados inmediatos que evitan ingresos hospitalarios; la aspiración digital es el método preferido por quienes realizan dicha técnica.</p><p id="spar0105" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">El estudio AMVADI fue registrado con el número ISRCTN46137912 en el ISRCTN Registry de BioMed Central.</p></span>" "secciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0025" "titulo" => "Introducción" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0030" "titulo" => "Métodos" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0035" "titulo" => "Resultados" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "abst0040" "titulo" => "Conclusiones" ] ] ] ] "NotaPie" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "☆" "nota" => "<p class="elsevierStyleNotepara" id="npar0005">Please cite this article as: Aguinagalde B, Zabaleta J, Fernández-Monge A, Lopez I, Izquierdo JM, Redin JA, et al. Aspiración manual versus aspiración digital en el tratamiento inicial del neumotórax espontáneo primario: estudio AMVADI. Ensayo clínico aleatorizado. Arch Bronconeumol. 2020;56:637–642.</p>" ] ] "apendice" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "seccion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "apendice" => "<p id="par0265" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The following are Supplementary data to this article:<elsevierMultimedia ident="upi0005"></elsevierMultimedia></p>" "etiqueta" => "Appendix A" "titulo" => "Supplementary data" "identificador" => "sec0090" ] ] ] ] "multimedia" => array:6 [ 0 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Fig. 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 2193 "Ancho" => 2500 "Tamanyo" => 327862 ] ] "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at0005" "detalle" => "Fig. " "rol" => "short" ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0005" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Recruitment and randomization process.</p>" ] ] 1 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "fig0010" "etiqueta" => "Fig. 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr2.jpeg" "Alto" => 1633 "Ancho" => 2917 "Tamanyo" => 250255 ] ] "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at0010" "detalle" => "Fig. " "rol" => "short" ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0010" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Management of randomized patients.</p>" ] ] 2 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "fig0015" "etiqueta" => "Fig. 3" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr3.jpeg" "Alto" => 1074 "Ancho" => 1667 "Tamanyo" => 64765 ] ] "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at0015" "detalle" => "Fig. " "rol" => "short" ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0015" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Kaplan-Meier analysis of recurrences during follow-up.</p>" ] ] 3 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "tbl0005" "etiqueta" => "Table 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at0020" "detalle" => "Table " "rol" => "short" ] ] "tabla" => array:2 [ "leyenda" => "<p id="spar0025" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">BMI: body mass index, calculated by weight (kg)/height (m)<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>; L: left; M: men; PYI: pack-year index, calculated by number of packs smoker per day multiplied by number of years; R: right; SD: standard deviation; smoker/former/never: active smoker/former smoker/never smoker; W: women.</p>" "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col">Manual group \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col">Digital group \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col">Difference \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th></tr><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">(n = 36) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">(n = 31) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Age, mean (SD) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">29.72 (10.33) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">27.58 (10.12) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">p = 0.4 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Sex, M/W \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">29/7 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">28/13 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">p = 0.8 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Side, R/L \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">22/14 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">18/13 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">p = 0.5 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">BMI, mean (SD) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">22.25 (3.61) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">20.86 (1.93) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">p = 0.08 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Smoking habit: smoker/former/never \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">18/14/13 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">21/1/9 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">p = 0.32 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">PYI, mean (SD) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">8.6 (9.14) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">12.22 (8.58) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">p = 0.15 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Light index, Average (SD) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">52.44 (23.92) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">46.25 (20.97) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">p = 0.27 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab2392001.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0020" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Patient characteristics.</p>" ] ] 4 => array:8 [ "identificador" => "tbl0010" "etiqueta" => "Table 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "detalles" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "at0025" "detalle" => "Table " "rol" => "short" ] ] "tabla" => array:2 [ "leyenda" => "<p id="spar0035" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Success: resolution of symptoms by ambulatory needle aspiration.</p><p id="spar0040" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Hospitalization: need for hospital admission with a fine tube connected to a water seal.</p><p id="spar0045" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Recurrence: episode of pneumothorax in the same hemitorax (includes all patients who recur, including patients who recur in the first month).</p><p id="spar0050" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Recurrence < 1 month: recurrence within the first month of admission.</p><p id="spar0055" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Length of stay: number of days admitted to the hospital.</p><p id="spar0060" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Need for intervention: patient operated for pneumothorax; criteria for surgery: recurrence, prolonged air leak, at-risk professions (pilot or professional divers).</p>" "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col">Manual group \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col">Digital group \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col">Difference \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th></tr><tr title="table-row"><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">(n = 36) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">(n = 31) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th><th class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" scope="col" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t\t\t</th></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Success, n (%) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">21 (58%) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">18 (58%) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">p = 0.98 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Hospitalization, n (%) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">15 (42%) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">13 (42%) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">p = 0.98 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Recurrence, n (%) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">8 (22%) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">6 (19%) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">p = 0.77 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Recurrence < 1 month, n (%) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">1 (2.7%) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">2 (6.4%) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">p = 0.47 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Length of stay, mean (SD) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">2.73 (1.6) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">4.76 (2.7) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">p = 0.98 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td-with-role" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t ; entry_with_role_rowhead " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Need for intervention, n (%) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">9 (25%) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">9 (29%) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">p = 0.71 \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab2392000.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0030" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Main study outcome variables.</p>" ] ] 5 => array:5 [ "identificador" => "upi0005" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAECOMPONENTE" "mostrarFloat" => false "mostrarDisplay" => true "Ecomponente" => array:2 [ "fichero" => "mmc1.pdf" "ficheroTamanyo" => 57727 ] ] ] "bibliografia" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "References" "seccion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "bibs0005" "bibliografiaReferencia" => array:21 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0005" "etiqueta" => "1" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Epidemiology of pneumothorax in England" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "D. Gupta" 1 => "A. Hansell" 2 => "T. Nichols" 3 => "T. Duong" 4 => "J.G. Ayres" 5 => "D. Strachan" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1136/thorax.55.8.666" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Thorax" "fecha" => "2000" "volumen" => "55" "paginaInicial" => "666" "paginaFinal" => "671" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10899243" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 1 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0010" "etiqueta" => "2" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Pneumothorax" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "M. Noppen" 1 => "T. De Keukeleire" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1159/000135932" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Respiration" "fecha" => "2008" "volumen" => "76" "paginaInicial" => "121" "paginaFinal" => "127" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18708734" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0015" "etiqueta" => "3" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Outcomes of emergency department patients treated for primary spontaneous pneumothorax" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "A.M. Kelly" 1 => "D. Kerr" 2 => "M. Clooney" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1378/chest.08-0910" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Chest" "fecha" => "2008" "volumen" => "134" "paginaInicial" => "1033" "paginaFinal" => "1036" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18583511" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 3 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0020" "etiqueta" => "4" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Pneumothorax: observation" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "Z. Li" 1 => "H. Huang" 2 => "Q. Li" 3 => "I. Kougioumtzi" 4 => "G. Dryllis" 5 => "I. Kioumis" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.03.16" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Thorac Dis" "fecha" => "2014" "volumen" => "6" "paginaInicial" => "421" "paginaFinal" => "426" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24822098" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 4 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0025" "etiqueta" => "5" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Effects of timing of thoracoscopic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax on prognosis and costs" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "T. Morimoto" 1 => "T. Shimbo" 2 => "Y. Noguchi" 3 => "H. Koyama" 4 => "Y. Sasaki" 5 => "K. Nishiwaki" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.07.032" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Am J Surg" "fecha" => "2004" "volumen" => "187" "paginaInicial" => "767" "paginaFinal" => "774" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15191873" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 5 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0030" "etiqueta" => "6" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Is video-assisted thoracic surgery justified at first spontaneous pneumothorax?" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "G. Torresini" 1 => "M. Vaccarili" 2 => "D. Divisi" 3 => "R. Crisci" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/s1010-7940(01)00679-0" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Eur J Cardiothorac Surg" "fecha" => "2001" "volumen" => "20" "paginaInicial" => "42" "paginaFinal" => "45" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11423272" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 6 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0035" "etiqueta" => "7" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: British Thoracic Society pleural disease guideline 2010" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "A. MacDuff" 1 => "A. Arnold" 2 => "J. Harvey" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1136/thx.2010.136986" "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "Thorax" "fecha" => "2010" "volumen" => "65" "numero" => "Suppl 2" "paginaInicial" => "ii18" "paginaFinal" => "ii31" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20696690" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 7 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0040" "etiqueta" => "8" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "A randomized controlled trial comparing minichest tube and needle aspiration in outpatient management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "K.K. Ho" 1 => "M.E.H. Ong" 2 => "M.S. Koh" 3 => "E. Wong" 4 => "J. Raghuram" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.ajem.2010.05.017" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Am J Emerg Med" "fecha" => "2011" "volumen" => "29" "paginaInicial" => "1152" "paginaFinal" => "1157" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20716475" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 8 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0045" "etiqueta" => "9" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Ambulatory treatment in the management of pneumothorax: a systematic review of the literature" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "F.J. Brims" 1 => "N.A. Maskell" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-202875" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Thorax" "fecha" => "2013" "volumen" => "68" "paginaInicial" => "664" "paginaFinal" => "669" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23515437" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 9 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0050" "etiqueta" => "10" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Percutaneous aspiration versus tube drainage for spontaneous pneumothorax: systematic review and meta-analysis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "B. Aguinagalde" 1 => "J. Zabaleta" 2 => "M. Fuentes" 3 => "N. Bazterargui" 4 => "C. Hernández" 5 => "J.M. Izquierdo" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.12.008" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Eur J Cardiothorac Surg" "fecha" => "2010" "volumen" => "37" "paginaInicial" => "1129" "paginaFinal" => "1135" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20060735" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 10 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0055" "etiqueta" => "11" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: An American College of Chest Physicians Delphi Consensus Statement" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "M.H. Baumann" 1 => "C. Strange" 2 => "J.E. Heffner" 3 => "R. Light" 4 => "T.J. Kirby" 5 => "J. Klein" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1378/chest.119.2.590" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Chest" "fecha" => "2001" "volumen" => "119" "paginaInicial" => "590" "paginaFinal" => "602" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11171742" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 11 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0060" "etiqueta" => "12" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Normativa sobre el diagnóstico y tratamiento del neumotórax espontáneo" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "J.J. Rivas" 1 => "M.F. Jimenez" 2 => "L. Molins" 3 => "A. Pérez Trullén" 4 => "J. Torres Lanzas" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/s1579-2129(08)60077-4" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Arch Bronconeumol" "fecha" => "2008" "volumen" => "44" "paginaInicial" => "437" "paginaFinal" => "448" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18775256" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 12 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0065" "etiqueta" => "13" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Management of pneumothorax differs across Denmark" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "U.W. Iepsen" 1 => "T. Ringbæk" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:4 [ "tituloSerie" => "Dan Med J" "fecha" => "2014" "volumen" => "60" "paginaInicial" => "A4803" ] ] ] ] ] ] 13 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0070" "etiqueta" => "14" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "K.F. Schulz" 1 => "D.G. Altman" 2 => "D. Moher" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00232" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Ann Int Med" "fecha" => "2010" "volumen" => "152" "paginaInicial" => "726" "paginaFinal" => "732" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20335313" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 14 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0075" "etiqueta" => "15" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Simple aspiration versus intercostal tube drainage for primary spontaneous pneumothorax in adults" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "A. Wakai" 1 => "R. O’Sullivan" 2 => "G. McCabe" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:3 [ "tituloSerie" => "Cochrane Database Syst Rev" "fecha" => "2007" "volumen" => "1" ] ] ] ] ] ] 15 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0080" "etiqueta" => "16" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "A prospective, randomised trial of pneumothorax therapy: manual aspiration versus conventional chest tube drainage" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "M. Parlak" 1 => "S.M. Uil" 2 => "J.W.K. van den Berg" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.rmed.2012.08.005" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Respir Med" "fecha" => "2012" "volumen" => "106" "paginaInicial" => "1600" "paginaFinal" => "1605" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22925840" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 16 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0085" "etiqueta" => "17" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "La punción-aspiración es una técnica segura y eficaz en el tratamiento del neumotórax espontáneo primario" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "B. Aguinagalde" 1 => "J. Zabaleta" 2 => "P. Busca" 3 => "J.A. Redin" 4 => "J.I. Emparanza" 5 => "J.M. Izquierdo" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Emergencias" "fecha" => "2013" "volumen" => "25" "paginaInicial" => "111" "paginaFinal" => "115" ] ] ] ] ] ] 17 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0090" "etiqueta" => "18" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Thopaz portable suction system in thoracic surgery: an end user assessment and feedback in a tertiary unit" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "S. Rathinam" 1 => "A. Bradley" 2 => "Cantlin" 3 => "P.B. Rajesh" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1186/1749-8090-6-59" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Cardiothorac Surg" "fecha" => "2011" "volumen" => "6" "paginaInicial" => "59" "paginaFinal" => "64" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21510897" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 18 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0095" "etiqueta" => "19" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "A pilot study of a digital drainage system in pneumothorax" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "G. Tunnicliffe" 1 => "A. Draper" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:3 [ "tituloSerie" => "BMJ Open Resp Res" "fecha" => "2014" "volumen" => "1" ] ] ] ] ] ] 19 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0100" "etiqueta" => "20" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Outpatient management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a prospective study" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "M. Massongo" 1 => "S. Leroy" 2 => "A. Scherpereel" 3 => "F. Vaniet" 4 => "X. Dhalluin" 5 => "B. Chahine" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Eur Respir J" "fecha" => "2014" "volumen" => "43" "paginaInicial" => "582" "paginaFinal" => "590" ] ] ] ] ] ] 20 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0105" "etiqueta" => "21" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Primary spontaneous pneumothorax: adherence to guidelines and healthcare economic implications" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "G.D. Thomas" 1 => "F.J.H. Brims" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Thorax" "fecha" => "2011" "volumen" => "66" "numero" => "Suppl 4" "paginaInicial" => "A81" "paginaFinal" => "A82" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "url" => "/15792129/0000005600000010/v1_202010020808/S1579212920302093/v1_202010020808/en/main.assets" "Apartado" => array:4 [ "identificador" => "9374" "tipo" => "SECCION" "en" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Original Articles" "idiomaDefecto" => true ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" ] "PDF" => "https://static.elsevier.es/multimedia/15792129/0000005600000010/v1_202010020808/S1579212920302093/v1_202010020808/en/main.pdf?idApp=UINPBA00003Z&text.app=https://archbronconeumol.org/" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1579212920302093?idApp=UINPBA00003Z" ]
Year/Month | Html | Total | |
---|---|---|---|
2024 November | 8 | 0 | 8 |
2024 October | 58 | 15 | 73 |
2024 September | 64 | 16 | 80 |
2024 August | 72 | 38 | 110 |
2024 July | 103 | 20 | 123 |
2024 June | 71 | 35 | 106 |
2024 May | 84 | 55 | 139 |
2024 April | 36 | 27 | 63 |
2024 March | 49 | 23 | 72 |
2024 February | 38 | 24 | 62 |
2023 August | 22 | 0 | 22 |
2023 March | 12 | 3 | 15 |
2023 February | 43 | 25 | 68 |
2023 January | 45 | 55 | 100 |
2022 December | 64 | 31 | 95 |
2022 November | 69 | 40 | 109 |
2022 October | 72 | 46 | 118 |
2022 September | 48 | 29 | 77 |
2022 August | 30 | 36 | 66 |
2022 July | 45 | 46 | 91 |
2022 June | 30 | 33 | 63 |
2022 May | 36 | 35 | 71 |
2022 April | 45 | 32 | 77 |
2022 March | 42 | 45 | 87 |
2022 February | 18 | 31 | 49 |
2022 January | 1 | 0 | 1 |
2020 November | 1 | 0 | 1 |