Journal Information
Vol. 42. Issue 8.
Pages 399-403 (August 2006)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 42. Issue 8.
Pages 399-403 (August 2006)
Original Articles
Full text access
Bronchioloalveolar Carcinoma in Spain: A Rare and Different Form of Lung Cancer
Visits
4544
Ángel López Encuentraa,**
Corresponding author
lencuent@h12o.es

Correspondence: Dr. A. López Encuentra. Servicio de Neumología. Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre. Avda. Córdoba, 5. 28041 Madrid. España
, Francisco Pozo Rodrígueza, José Luis Martín de Nicolásb, Victoria Villenaa, Javier Sayas Catalána, the Bronchogenic Carcinoma Cooperative Group of the Spanish Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery (GCCB-S) *
a Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
b Servicio de Cirugía Toráeica, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Objective

To describe a series of cases of bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC) treated surgically between 1993 and 1997 in the 19 hospitals that make up the Bronchogenic Carcinoma Cooperative Group of the Spanish Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery (GCCB-S).

Patients and methods

From a total of 2944 cases of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 82 (3%) were BAC. The clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with BAC were compared with those of the remaining 2862 patients with NSCLC.

Results

The percentage of men was lower for BAC than for other types of NSCLC (64.6% compared with 93.5%; P<.001) and BAC was associated with less comorbidity (50% vs 62%; P<.05), particularly in terms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (33% vs 47.2%; P<.05). Other characteristics showing significant differences were the higher frequency of BAC as a chance finding and the lower likelihood of weight loss or reduced performance status at the time of diagnosis. Classification as stage cI was significantly more common in patients with BAC (87% vs 75%; P<.001), and this difference between groups was more pronounced for stage pI (68.5% vs 47%; P<.01). Only taking into account patients classified as stage pI with complete resection of NSCLC and following exclusion of operative mortality, patients with BAC presented an overall 5-year survival of 65% (95% confidence interval [CI], 51%-79%), compared with a significantly lower survival of 53% (95% CI, 50%-56%; P<.05) in patients with other forms of NSCLC.

Conclusions

In Spain, among cases of lung cancer treated by surgery, BAC is very rare (3%) and displays clinical characteristics that are different from other forms of NSCLC. Controlling for the most basic prognostic factors (stage pI and complete resection), survival is significantly higher for BAC.

Key words:
Lung cancer
Staging
Surgery
Bronchioloalveolar carcinoma
Objetivo

Describir una serie de casos de carcinoma bronquioloalveolar (CBA) tratados quirúrgicamente por los 19 hospitales del Grupo Cooperativo de Carcinoma Broncogénico de la Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica (GCCB-S) entre 1993 y 1997.

Pacientes y métodos

Del total de 2.944 casos de carcinoma broncogénico no microcítico (CBNM), 82 (3%) eran CBA. Se compararon las características clínicas y el pronóstico de los CBA con los de los restantes 2.862 CBNM.

Resultados

Los CBA ocurren menos frecuentemente en varones (el 64,6 frente al 93,5%; p = 0,001), tienen menos comorbilidad en general (el 50 frente al 62%; p < 0,05) y enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica en particular (el 33 frente al 47,2%; p < 0,05). Otras características con diferencias significativas son la mayor frecuencia de que el CBA sea un hallazgo casual y la menor probabilidad de que en el momento del diagnóstico exista historia de pérdida de peso o peor estado clínico. Por estadios clínicos, la clasificación Ic es significativamente más frecuente en los CBA (el 87 frente al 75%; p = 0,001), diferencia que se incrementa en la estadificación Ip (el 68,5 frente al 47%; p < 0,01). Considerando la población de CBNM con resección completa en estadio Ip, y una vez excluida la mortalidad operatoria, los CBA presentan una supervivencia global a los 5 años del 65% (intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%, 51-79%), significativamente superior al resto de CBNM no CBA, en que es del 53% (IC del 95%, 50-56%) (p < 0,05).

Conclusiones

En España, entre los casos de cáncer de pulmón operado, el CBA es muy infrecuente (3%) y presenta características clínicas diferentes del resto de los CBNM. Controlando con los factores pronósticos más básicos (estadio Ip y resección completa), la supervivencia del CBA es significativamente superior.

Palabras clave:
Cáncer de pulmón
Estadificación
Cirugía
Carcinoma bronquioloalveolar
Full text is only aviable in PDF
References
[1]
TV Colby, M Noguchi.
Adenocarcinoma.
Tumours of the lung, pleura, thymus and heart, pp. 35-44
[2]
WD Travis, K Garg, WA Franklin, II Wistuba, B Sabloff, M Noguchi, et al.
Evolving concepts in the pathology and computed tomography imaging of lung adenocarcinoma and bronchioloalveolar carcinoma.
J Clin Oncol, 23 (2005), pp. 3279-3287
[3]
VA Miller, FR Hirsch, DH Johnson.
Systemic therapy of advanced bronchioloalveolar cell carcinoma: challenges and opportunities.
J Clin Oncol, 23 (2005), pp. 3288-3293
[4]
Grupo Cooperativo de Carcinoma Broncogénico de SEPAR (GCCB-S).
Cirugía del carcinoma broncogénico en España. Estudio descriptivo.
Arch Bronconeumol, 31 (1995), pp. 303-309
[5]
LH Sobin, C Wittekind.
UICC International Union Against Cancer, TNM classification of malignant tumours, 5th ed, pp. 91-97
[6]
A López Encuentra, the Bronchogenic Carcinoma Cooperative Group of the Spanish Society of Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery (GCCB-S).
Criteria of functional and oncological operability in surgery for lung cancer. A multicenter study.
Lung Cancer, 20 (1998), pp. 161-168
[7]
A López Encuentra, A Gómez de la Cámara, A Varela de Ugarte, N Mañes, N y GCCB-S Llobregat.
El “fenómeno Will-Rogers”. Migración de estadios en carcinoma broncogénico, tras aplicar criterios de certeza clasificatoria.
Arch Bronconeumol, 38 (2002), pp. 166-171
[8]
American Thoracic Society.
Clinical staging primary lung cancer.
Am Rev Respir Dis, 127 (1983), pp. 659-664
[9]
JR Izbicki, B Passlick, O Karg, C Bloechle, K Pantel, WT Knoefel, et al.
Impact of radical systematic mediastinal lymphadenectomy on tumor staging in lung cancer.
Ann Thorac Surg, 59 (1995), pp. 209-214
[10]
A Gajra, N Newman, GP Gamble, LJ Kohman, SL Graziano.
Effect of number of lymph nodes sampled on outcome in patients with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer.
J Clin Oncol, 21 (2003), pp. 1029-1034
[11]
A López Encuentra, A Gómez de la Cámara, for the Bronchogenic Carcinoma Cooperative Group of the Spanish Society of Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery (GCCB-S).
Validation of a central review board of staging prior to surgery for non-small-cell lung cancer-impact on prognosis: a multicenter study.
Respiration, 69 (2002), pp. 16-24
[12]
Grupo Cooperativo de Carcinoma Broncogénico de SEPAR (GCCB-S).
Control de calidad en un registro multiinstitucional de carcinoma broncogénico.
Arch Bronconeumol, 32 (1996), pp. 70
[13]
A López-Encuentra, R García Luján, JJ Rivas, J Rodríguez-Rodríguez, J Torres-Lanza, G Varela Simó.
Bronchogenic Carcinoma Cooperative Group of the Spanish Society of Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery Comparison between clinical and pathologic staing in 2994 cases lung cancer.
Ann Thorac Surg, 79 (2005), pp. 974-979
[14]
FC Detterbeck, DR Jones, WF Funkhouser.
Bronchioloalveolar carcinoma.
Diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. An evidence-based guide for the practicing clinician, pp. 394-407
[15]
WL Read, NC Page, RM Tierney, JF Piccirillo, R Govindan.
The epidemiology of bronchioloalveolar carcinoma over the past two decades: analysis of the SEER database.
Lung Cancer, 45 (2004), pp. 137-142
[16]
SK Wootton, CL Halbert, AD Miller.
Sheep retrovirus structural protein induces lung tumours.
Nature, 434 (2005), pp. 904-907
[17]
M de las Heras, SH Barsky, P Hasleton, M Wagner, E Larson, J Egan, et al.
Evidence for a protein related immunologically to the jaagsiekte sheep retrovirus in some human lung tumours.
Eur Respir J, 16 (2000), pp. 330-332
[18]
A López-Encuentra, H Bulzebruck, AR Feinstein, G Motta, CF Mountain, T Naruke, et al.
Tumor staging and classification in lung cancer.
Lung Cancer, 29 (2000), pp. 79-83
[19]
KH Albertine, RM Steiner, DM Radack, DM Golding, D Peterson, HE Cohn, et al.
Analysis of cell type and radiographic presentation as predictors of the clinical course of patients with bronchioalveolar cell carcinoma.
Chest, 113 (1998), pp. 997-1006
[20]
P Dumont, B Gasser, C Rouge, G Massard, JM Wihlm.
Bronchoalveolar carcinoma: histopathologic study of evolution in a series of 105 surgically treated patients.
Chest, 113 (1998), pp. 391-395
[21]
RC Daly, VF Trastek, PC Pairolero, PA Murtaugh, MS Huang, MS Allen, et al.
Bronchoalveolar carcinoma: factors affecting survival.
Ann Thorac Surg, 51 (1991), pp. 368-376
[22]
K Okubo, EJ Mark, D Flieder, JC Wain, CD Wright, AC Moncure, et al.
Bronchoalveolar carcinoma: clinical, radiologic, and pathologic factors and survival.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 118 (1999), pp. 702-709
[23]
FL Grover, S Piantadosi.
Recurrence and survival following resection of bronchioloalveolar carcinoma of the lung-The Lung Cancer Study Group experience.
Ann Surg, 209 (1989), pp. 779-790
[24]
JF Regnard, N Santelmo, N Romdhani, N Gharbi, J Bourcereau, E Dulmet, et al.
Bronchioloalveolar lung carcinoma: results of surgical treatment and prognostic factors.
Chest, 114 (1998), pp. 45-50
[25]
MI Ebright, MF Zakowski, J Martin, ES Venkatraman, VA Miller, MS Bains, et al.
Clinical pattern and pathologic stage but not histologic features predict outcome for bronchioloalveolar carcinoma.
Ann Thorac Surg, 74 (2002), pp. 1640-1646
[26]
M Noguchi, A Morikawa, M Kawasaki, Y Matsuno, T Yamada, S Hirohashi, et al.
Small adenocarcinoma of the lung. Histologic characteristics and prognosis.
Cancer, 75 (1995), pp. 2844-2852
[27]
P Goldstraw.
The International Staging Committee of the IASLC: its origins and purpose.
Lung Cancer, 37 (2002), pp. 345-348

A complete list of the members of GCCB-S is contained in the appendix.

This study was partially funded by grants FIS 97/0011, FEPAR-2002, RTIC-03/11-ISCIII-Red-Respira, and FIS 03/46, and support from the Autonomous Community of Castile and Leon and Fundación Menarini.

Copyright © 2006. Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica (SEPAR)
Archivos de Bronconeumología
Article options
Tools

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?