Journal Information
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Clinical Letter
Full text access
Available online 4 November 2024
Asthma-COPD Overlap – A Gateway to Biological Treatment
Visits
419
Alicia Padilla-Galo
Corresponding author
aliciapadillagalo@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
, Marina Rubio-Moreno, Borja Valencia-Azcona
Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario Costa del Sol, Spain
This item has received
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (1)
Full Text
To the Director,

Asthma-COPD overlap (ACO) involves patients with asthma-like characteristics who have been exposed to COPD risk factors and developed persistent airflow obstruction (PAO).1 These patients typically have more symptoms, lower quality of life, and a higher risk of exacerbations than COPD patients. According to the SEPAR consensus on ACO,2 diagnosis is made in patients ≥35 years old, with ≥10 pack-years smoking history, PAO, and either a current asthma diagnosis, a highly positive bronchodilator test, or elevated blood eosinophilia. In terms of treatment, ACO patients have a poorer response to inhaled corticosteroids than asthma patients, but monoclonal antibodies approved for asthma can also be used, although real-world data on benralizumab is limited.

We present the case of a 54-year-old man ex-smoker with a 60 pack-year history, diagnosed with COPD and receiving triple inhalation therapy at a COPD clinic. He has undergone four surgeries for nasal polyposis, had PAO in all follow-ups, a positive skin test for dog and cat epithelia, and 6% blood eosinophilia (historically always above 460eosinophils/μl). He had dyspnea with mMRC grade 1, wheezing since age 30, 5–6 exacerbations per year in recent years treated with antibiotics and oral corticosteroids, including two hospitalizations in the last year. He was referred to our asthma clinic, where an obstructive spirometry with a negative bronchodilator test (FEV1/FVC: 45%, FEV1: 48%), FeNO 99ppb, IgE 259, and eosinophilia of 8.7% (700eosinophils/μl) were observed. He was diagnosed with ACO, inhalation therapy was adjusted, and due to persistent poor control, benralizumab treatment was initiated. Over the three years of follow-up after starting benralizumab, he reported significant clinical improvement (ACT 23), requiring only one course of antibiotics and oral corticosteroids. Additionally, his nasal polyposis improved, with no further surgeries needed. FeNO decreased to 24, and he still has PAO, but with an FEV1 >80%. See Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Pulmonary function evolution.

(0.22MB).

Given the clinical features consistent with asthma, recurrent nasal polyposis, frequent exacerbations despite appropriate treatment, and elevated T2 markers, along with COPD-related features such as a 60 pack-year smoking history and PAO, the patient was diagnosed with ACO according to the SEPAR consensus criteria.2 The lack of a standardized and universally accepted definition of ACO makes diagnosis complex, often leading to underdiagnosis. Furthermore, treatment options are limited as there are no specific biomarkers or standardized therapies. Clinical trials for biologic drugs in severe asthma excluded smokers, while COPD trials excluded patients with asthma features, leaving ACO patients unrepresented. This has resulted in ACO patients being less likely to receive biologics compared to those with severe asthma. Thus, real-world studies on the use of biologics in ACO are essential, though currently limited. The main real-world studies in ACO3,4 focused on omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, and dupilumab. A recent study with benralizumab,5 using insurance database records in the US, lacked clinical or spirometric criteria, introducing potential selection bias. Nevertheless, all real-world studies confirm biologics’ effectiveness in ACO. This case highlights the clinical improvement and remarkable lung function response with benralizumab, emphasizing the need for accurate diagnosis and specific precision medicine treatments.

Conflict of Interests

The authors state that they have no conflict of interests.

References
[1]
GINA 2024. Available from: https://ginasthma.org [accessed 20.09.23].
[2]
V. Plaza, F. Álvarez, M. Calle, C. Casanova, B.G. Cosío, A. López-Viña, et al.
Consensus on the asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS) between the Spanish COPD guidelines (GesEPOC) and the Spanish guidelines on the management of asthma (GEMA).
Arch Bronconeumol, 53 (2017), pp. 443-449
[3]
J.S. Shim, H. Kim, J.W. Kwon, S.Y. Park, S. Kim, B.K. Kim, et al.
A comparison of treatment response to biologics in asthma-COPD overlap and pure asthma: findings from the PRISM study.
World Allergy Organ J, 16 (2023), pp. 100848
[4]
L. Pérez de Llano, D. Dacal Rivas, N. Marina Malanda, V. Plaza Moral, J.A. Gullón Blanco, M. Muñoz-Esquerre, et al.
The response to biologics is better in patients with severe asthma than in patients with asthma-COPD overlap syndrome.
J Asthma Allergy, 15 (2022), pp. 363-369
[5]
D.D. Carstens, D.J. Maselli, E.E. Cook, F. Mu, J. Chen, D. Yang, et al.
Real-world effectiveness of benralizumab among patients with asthma and concomitant chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis, 19 (2024), pp. 1813-1818
Copyright © 2024. SEPAR
Archivos de Bronconeumología
Article options
Tools

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?