Assessment of the Portable COPD-6 Device for Detecting Obstructive Airway Diseases

Represas, Cristina Represas; Rial, Maribel Botana; Fernández, Virginia Leiro; Silva, Ana Isabel González; del Campo Pérez, Víctor; Fernández-Villar, Alberto

doi:10.1016/S1579-2129(10)70101-4

Archivos de Bronconeumología

ISSN: 0300-2896

Archivos de Bronconeumologia is an international journal that publishes original studies whose content is based upon results of research initiatives dealing with several aspects of respiratory medicine including epidemiology, respiratory physiology, pathophysiology of respiratory diseases, clinical management, thoracic surgery, pediatric lung diseases, respiratory critical care, respiratory allergy and basic research. Other types of articles such as editorials, reviews, and different types of letters are also published in the journal. Additionally, the journal expresses the voice of the following scientific societies: the Spanish Respiratory Society of Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery (SEPAR; https://www.separ.es/), the Latin American Thoracic Society (ALAT; https://alatorax.org/), and the Iberian American Association of Thoracic Surgery (AIACT; http://www.aiatorax.com/).

It is a monthly journal in which all manuscripts are sent to peer-review and handled by the editor or an associate editor from the team and the final decision is made on the basis of the comments from the expert reviewers and the editors. The journal is published solely in English. All the published data is composed of novel manuscripts not previously published in any other journal and not being in consideration for publication in any other journal..

The journal is indexed at Science Citation Index Expanded, Medline/Pubmed, Embase and SCOPUS. Access to any published article is possible through the journal's web page as well as from Pubmed, ScienceDirect, and other international databases. Furthermore, the journal is also present in X, Facebook and Linkedin. Manuscripts can be submitted electronically using the following web site: https://www.editorialmanager.com/ARBR/.

Indexed in:

Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, JCR SCI-Expanded, Index Medicus/Medline, Excerpta Medica/EMBASE, IBECS, IME, SCOPUS, IBECS

Subscribe:

Impact factor

The Impact Factor measures the average number of citations received in a particular year by papers published in the journal during the two preceding years.

© Clarivate Analytics, Journal Citation Reports 2022

Impact factor 2023

8.7

Citescore

CiteScore measures average citations received per document published.

Citescore 2023

3.5

SJR

SRJ is a prestige metric based on the idea that not all citations are the same. SJR uses a similar algorithm as the Google page rank; it provides a quantitative and qualitative measure of the journal's impact.

SJR 2023

0.464

SNIP

SNIP measures contextual citation impact by wighting citations based on the total number of citations in a subject field.

SNIP 2023

0.482

View more metrics

Open Access Option

Journal Information

Previous article | Next article

Vol. 46. Issue 8.

Pages 426-432 (January 2010)

More article options

Pages 426-432 (January 2010)

Original Article

DOI: 10.1016/S1579-2129(10)70101-4

Full text access

Assessment of the Portable COPD-6 Device for Detecting Obstructive Airway Diseases

Validación del dispositivo portátil COPD-6 para la detección de patologías obstructivas de la vía aérea

Visits

6530

Download PDF

Cristina Represas Represasa,b,d, Maribel Botana Riala,b,d, Virginia Leiro Fernándeza,b,d, Ana Isabel González Silvaa,b,d, Víctor del Campo Pérezc,d, Alberto Fernández-Villara,b,d,

Corresponding author

alberto.fernandez.villar@sergas.es

Corresponding author.

a Grupo de Investigación en Enfermedades Respiratorias e Infecciosas, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo, Vigo, Spain

b Servicio de Neumología, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo, Vigo, Spain

c Servicio de Medicina Preventiva, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo, Vigo, Spain

d Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Vigo (IBIV), Vigo, Spain

This item has received

6530 Visits

Article information

Statistics

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the agreement and the association with FEV1, FEV6 and FEV1/FEV6 measured with the Vitalograph-COPD-6 portable device and the FEV1, FVC and FEV1/FVC by conventional spirometry, and to analyse the validity of this device to detect obstruction.

Methodology

A cross-sectional, descriptive, prospective study, that included 180 subjects. A conventional spirometry and a spirometry with the Vitalograph-COPD-6 were sequentially performed on them. The agreement was analysed [kappa index and interclass correlation coefficient (ICC)], as well as the association [Pearson correlation coefficient (r)], area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the FEV1/FEV6 in detecting obstruction, and the sensitivity, specificity, predictive values (PPV and NPV), and probability ratios (PR+ and PR–) of the different FEV1/FEV6 cut-off points in the detection of obstruction.

Results

The prevalence of obstruction was 47 %. The kappa index was 0.59 when an FEV1/FEV6 < cut-off point of < 0.7 was used. The ICC and the r between the FEV1 measured by the two instruments, FEV6 and FEV1/FEV6 measured by the Vitalograph-COPD-6 and the FVC and FEV1/FVC determined by the spirometer were all greater than 0.92. The ROC AUC was 0.97. To detect obstruction, if the cut-off point of FEV1/FEV6 (for COPD-6) was < 0.70, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, CR+ and CR– were, 58 %, 100 %, 100 %, 73 %, ∞ and 0.42, respectively. For a cut-off point of < 0.8, they were 96 %, 76 %, 78 %, 96 %, 3.8 and 0.05, respectively.

Conclusions

The portable Vitalograph-COPD-6 device is precise for the detection of airway obstruction. The best sensitivity/specificity of FEV1/FEV6 was obtained with cut-off points greater than 0.7.

Keywords:

FEV6

Spirometry

Screening

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Resumen

Objetivos

Evaluar la concordancia y la relación del FEV1, FEV6 y FEV1/FEV6 medidos con el dispositivo portátil Vitalograph-COPD-6 y del FEV1, FVC y FEV1/FVC mediante espirometría convencional y analizar la validez de este dispositivo para detectar obstrucción.

Metodología

Estudio prospectivo, descriptivo, transversal. Se incluyeron 180 sujetos a los que se les realizó secuencialmente una espirometría convencional y una con el Vitalograph-COPD-6. Se analizó la concordancia (índice kappa y coeficiente de correlación intraclase [CCI]), relación (coeficiente de correlación de Pear son [r]), área bajo la curva (ABC) ROC del FEV1/FEV6 en la detección de obstrucción y se calcularon la sensibilidad, especificidad, valores predictivos (VPP y VPN) y cocientes de probabilidad (CP+ y CP–) de distintos puntos de corte del FEV1/FEV6 en la detección de obstrucción.

Resultados

La prevalencia de obstrucción fue del 47 %. Utilizando un punto de corte del FEV1/FEV6 < 0,7 el índice kappa fue de 0,59. El CCI y el r entre el FEV1 medido por los 2 aparatos, FEV6 y FEV1/FEV6 medido por el Vitalograph-COPD-6 y la FVC y FEV1/FVC determinados por el espirómetro fueron todos superiores a 0,92. El ABC ROC fue de 0,97. Para detectar obstrucción, si el punto de corte de FEV1/FEV6 (por COPD-6) es < 0,70, la sensibilidad, especificidad, VPP, VPN, CP + y CP– fueron 58 %, 100 %, 100 %, 73 %, ∞ y 0,42, respectivamente. Para un punto de corte < 0,80 fueron 96 %, 76 %, 78 %, 96 %, 3,8 y 0,05, respectivamente.

Conclusiones

El medidor portátil Vitalograph-COPD-6 es preciso para la detección de obstrucción de la vía aérea. La mejor relación sensibilidad/especificidad del cociente FEV1/FEV6 se obtuvo con puntos de corte superiores a 0,7.

Palabras clave:

FEV6

Espirometría

Cribado

Enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica

Full text is only aviable in PDF

References

[1.]

Estrategia nacional en EPOC del Sistema Nacional de Salud Aprobada por el Consejo Interterritorial del Sistema Nacional de Salud el 3 de junio de 2009. Ministerio de Sanidad y Política social [accessed 25/1/2010]. Available from: http://www.msc.es/organizacion/sns/planCalidadSNS/docs/EstrategiaEPOCSNS

[2.]

Guía española del manejo del asma.

Arch Bronconeumol, 45 (2009), pp. 2-35

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-2896(09)73495-7 | Medline

[3.]

GOLD Executive and Science Commitees Global strategy for the diagnosis, management and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Updated december 2009. Available from: http://www.goldcopd.com [accessed 25/1/2010].

[4.]

R. Rodrígez-Roisín, J.A. Barberá, L. Sánchez-Agudo, J. Molina París, J. Sunyer, V. Macián, et al.

SEPAR-semFYC. Documento de consenso sobre enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica.

Arch Bronconeumol, 39 (2003), pp. 5-6

Medline

[5.]

C. García Benito, F. García Río.

¿Qué podemos hacer ante la escasa implantación de la espirometría en atención primaria?.

Aten Primaria, 33 (2004), pp. 261-266

Medline

[6.]

A. Fernández-Villar, M. Torres, M. Mosteiro, C. Represas, M., Núñez M. Botana, et al.

Utilización de la espirometría en los centros de atención primaria de Galicia.

Pneuma, 2 (2005), pp. 8-12

[7.]

J. De Miguel Díez, J.L. Izquierdo Alonso, J.M. Rodríguez González-Moro, P. De Lucas Ramos, J.M. Bellón Cano, J. Molina Paris.

Fiabilidad del diagnóstico de la EPOC en atención primaria y neumología en España. Factores predictivos.

Arch Bronconeumol, 40 (2004), pp. 431-437

Medline

[8.]

J.M. Manresa Presas, J. Rebull Fatsini, M. Miravalls Figuerola, R. Caballol Angelats, P. Minué Magana, R. Juan Franquet.

La espirometría en el diagnóstico de la enfermedad pulmonar en atención primaria.

Aten Primaria, 32 (2003), pp. 435-436

Medline

[9.]

J.Y. Jing, T.C. Huang, W. Cui, F. Xu, H.H. Shen.

Should FEV1/FEV6 replace FEV1/FVC ratio to detect airway obstruction? A metaanalysis.

Chest, 135 (2009), pp. 991-998

http://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.08-0723 | Medline

[10.]

R. Toda, T. Hoshino, T. Kawayama, H. Imaoka, Y. Sakazaki, T. Tsuda, et al.

Validation of “lung age” measured by spirometry and handy electronic FEV1/FEV6 meter in pulmonary diseases.

Intern Med, 48 (2009), pp. 513-521

Article | Medline

[11.]

S. Duong-Quy, T. Hua-Huy, B. Mai-Huu-Thanh, N. Doan-Thi-Quynh, K. Le-Quang, H. Nguyen-Van, et al.

Early detection of smoking related chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Vietnam.

Rev Mal Respir, 26 (2009), pp. 267-274

Medline

[12.]

M. Kaufmann, S. Hartl, K. Geyer, M.K. Breyer, O.C. Burghuber.

Measuring FEV(6) for detecting early airway obstruction in the primary care setting. Quality and utility of the new PiKo-6 device.

Respiration, 78 (2009), pp. 161-167

http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000197466 | Medline

[13.]

Ficha técnica del Vitalograph COPD-6 Available from: http://www.vitalograph.co.uk/pdf_library/productleaflets/asthma_copd/Vitalograph_copd6_Range_leaflet.pdf [accessed 12/12/2009].

[14.]

J. Roca, J. Sanchís, A. Agustí Vidal, F. Segarra, D. Navajas, R. Rodriguez-Roisin, et al.

Espirometric reference values for a mediterranean population.

Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir, 22 (1986), pp. 217-224

Medline

[15.]

P.H. Quanjer, G.J. Tammeling, J.E. Cotes, O.F. Pedersen, R. Peslin, J.C. Yernault.

Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows. Work Group on Standardization of Respiratory Function Tests. European Community for Coal and Steel. Official position of the European Respiratory Society.

Rev Mal Respir, 11 (1994), pp. 5-40

Medline

[16.]

J. Sanchís, P. Casán, J. Castillo, N. González, L. Palenciano, J. Roca.

Normativa para la práctica de la espirometría forzada.

Arch Bronconeumol, 25 (1989), pp. 132-142

[17.]

A. Díez Herranz.

Concordancia entre los valores de referencia para la espirometría recomendados por las Sociedades Neumológicas Española y Europea.

Arch Bronconeumol, 32 (1996), pp. 459-462

Medline

[18.]

J. Castellsagué, F. Burgos, J., Barberà J.A. Sunyer, J. Roca, For the Barcelona Collaborative Group on Reference Values for Pulmonary Function testing and the Spanish Group of the European Community Respiratory health Survey.

Respir Med, 92 (1998), pp. 401-407

Medline

[19.]

T. Eaton, S. Withy, J.E. Garret, J. Mercer, R.ML. Whitlock, H.H. Rea.

Spirometry in primary care practice. The importance of quality assurance and the impact of spirometry workshops.

Chest, 116 (1999), pp. 416-423

Medline

[20.]

F.W. Rosa, R. Pérez-Padilla, A. Camelier, O.A. Nascimento, A.M. Menezes, J.R. Jardim, Latin American Project for Investigation of Obstructive Lung Disease (PLATINO) Group.

Efficacy of the FEV1/FEV6 ratio compared to the FEV1/FVC ratio for the diagnosis of airway obstruction in subjects aged 40 years or over.

Braz J Med Biol Res, 40 (2007), pp. 1615-1621

Medline

[21.]

J. Vandevoorde, S. Verbanck, D. Schuermans, J. Kartounian, W. Vincken.

Obstructive and restrictive spirometric patterns: fixed cut-offs for FEV1/FEV6 and FEV6.

Eur Respir J, 27 (2006), pp. 378-383

http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/09031936.06.00036005 | Medline

[22.]

J. Vandevoorde, S. Verbanck, D. Schuermans, J. Kartounian, W. Vincken.

FEV1/FEV6 and FEV6 as an alternative for FEV1/FVC and FVC in the spirometric detection of airway obstruction and restriction.

Chest, 127 (2005), pp. 1560-1564

http://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.127.5.1560 | Medline

[23.]

W.M. Vollmer, T. Gíslason, P. Burney, P.L. Enright, A. Gulsvik, A. Kocabas, et al.

Comparison of spirometry criteria for the diagnosis of COPD: results from the BOLD study.

Eur Respir J, 34 (2009), pp. 588-597

http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00164608 | Medline

Tools

Indexed in:

Follow us:

Subscribe:

Subscribe to our newsletter