Journal Information
Vol. 57. Issue 11.
Pages 724-725 (November 2021)
Vol. 57. Issue 11.
Pages 724-725 (November 2021)
Scientific Letter
Full text access
A web-based application for spirometry quality in a public health system. 10-year follow-up
Programa de telemedicina para el control de calidad de espirometrías en un sistema público de salud durante 10 años
Nuria Marinaa,b,
Corresponding author
, Elena López de Santa Maríaa, Agustin Martinezc, Joseba Andiaa,b, Milagros Iriberria,b, Nicolás Gonzalezd, Saioa Artazad, Juan B. Gáldiza,b,e,f
a Departamento de Neumología, Hospital Universitario de Cruces, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain
b BioCruces Bizkaia, Bizkaia, Spain
c Atención Primaria Osakidetza, Bizkaia, Spain
d Departamento de Informática-Osakidetza Servicios Centrales, País Vasco, Spain
e Universidad del País Vasco (UPV-EHU), País Vasco, Spain
f Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain
Article information
Full Text
Download PDF
Tables (2)
Table 1. Total number of sites included, number of tests, and percentage of good quality spirometries.
Table 2. Number of spirometries performed per month between 2019 and 2020.
Show moreShow less
Full Text
To the Editor:

Forced spirometry (FS) is one of the principal diagnostic procedures in the study of patients with respiratory symptoms. Though considered a simple technique, it requires patient collaboration and must be performed by a highly qualified technician1. Nowadays, it is commonly performed in primary care, but difficulties in achieving appropriate quality levels are becoming apparent. Although the role of this procedure in respiratory medicine is well established, some controversy has arisen regarding the quality of results and underuse of the technique2–4.

New technologies have now emerged that facilitate technician training and the submission and monitoring of results to be performed online. We first became familiar with this approach when we participated in a multicenter study on the introduction of a telemedicine program for quality control of spirometries that included 12 centers in Spain5. We subsequently demonstrated how this program could be implemented in a public health service6, and how it could be cost-effective7, since failure to obtain quality spirometries generates additional expenses associated with overdiagnosis and overtreatment8.

This telemedicine program was implemented in our public health system in 2010. The application provides training in the performance of spirometry based on clinical guidelines1 and in the use of the computer application itself. After a 4-h training session, technicians submit the tests performed in their usual practice and these are evaluated according to the established quality standards1. This working practice means that technicians are offered continuous training.

The program has now been in place for 10 years and a total of 125 primary care centers have been included (75% of all health system centers) and 500 nurses have been trained. In the first year (2010), 15 centers were incorporated. At the beginning of the program, 57% of spirometries performed in these centers were good quality, a figure that rose to 78% at 6 months and to 83% at 9 months (P < .001)6. Since then, quality has been evaluated annually, and the rates of good quality tests (83%–90%) have been maintained over the years since the implementation of the program (Table 1). In 2020, specifically since March, we observed a significant decrease in the number of tests performed due to Covid-19 restrictions (Tables 1 and 2). Thanks to this program, we have been able to streamline the spirometry protocol in the different centers, following the recommendations of the Spanish Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery (SEPAR)9, and we have reintroduced testing with the appropriate safety measures in place. In their editorial, Burgos et al.10 commented that once the first wave of Covid-19 in March 2020 had passed, the activity of both hospital and primary care lung function laboratories would have to resume.

Table 1.

Total number of sites included, number of tests, and percentage of good quality spirometries.

  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020 
Centers included  15  15  45  78  93  115  117  125  125  125  125 
Total number of spirometries  197  1894  5795  9039  11,108  11,691  11,449  12,161  11,566  11,246  2857 
% good quality tests  57  83  84  83.4  87.4  87.2  89  90.3  90  86  85 
Table 2.

Number of spirometries performed per month between 2019 and 2020.

January  2019  985 
  2020  1040 
February  2019  1019 
  2020  1264 
March  2019  1001 
  2020  425 
April  2019  1018 
May  2019  1118 
June  2019  1005 
  2020  22 
July  2019  715 
  2020  12 
August  2019  511 
September  2019  843 
October  2019  1101 
  2020  17 
November  2019  1086 
  2020  26 
December  2019  844 
  2020  35 
Total  2019  11,246 
  2020  2857 

Various studies have assessed the use of telemedicine programs in the quality control of spirometries. The Alliance study11 collected a large number of spirometries (20,757), but confirmed that deficiencies observed in standard practice do not improve unless a training program is implemented. A high percentage of poor-quality tests was reported in this study. Mass et al.12 found that with telemedicine quality spirometries could be performed, even remotely, without direct contact with the patient, but this study was only applicable to a local setting. The same approach was used by Berlinski et al.13, who evaluated 38 patients and 50 spirometries, of which 84% were good quality. Represas et al.14 carried out a training program based on theoretical and practical workshops, improving technicians’ skills, but the quality of the studies declined over time. Thijssing et al.15 reported a telemedicine program that included telespirometry. They performed 227 spirometries over a period of 3 years, of which 31% were poor quality according to their guidelines, although these are not specified in the article.

The quality of spirometry performed in primary care in our setting has always been controversial because of the difficulty of achieving acceptable levels of quality. In Navarra, Hueto et al.3 found that very few procedures were performed according to guidelines, and that the quality of 76% of the tests was unacceptable. Naberan et al.4 reported that availability of the technique in primary care centers was limited and training was substandard, resulting in poor adherence to the guidelines. In our study, the quality evaluation at the beginning of the program after professionals had completed face-to-face training program in their own health center was 57%6, a level that we interpret as representative of our setting, although it must be borne in mind that the professionals were motivated and had attended an initial training workshop. Even so, these findings show that a one-off intervention cannot immediately yield optimal results, and support the idea that continuous training is more effective, especially in routine clinical practice.

The design of our program is practical, as it includes a single training session at the beginning, backed up by continuous ongoing training. In this way, centers can be included progressively. Our program offers the possibility of including a large number of spirometries, so it can be considered a universal application in any health area. This study shows that a telemedicine system for spirometry monitoring can achieve and maintain high levels of quality (greater than 80%) in the primary care setting over 10 years within a public health system. The implementation of this program was recognized as good practice by the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Strategy of the National Health System in 201516.

Guidelines highlight the importance of training in helping the spirometry technician achieve appropriate test quality levels. This program ensures a unified, guideline-based1, training program for all technicians who perform this procedure in our health system. This intervention has helped reduce the proportion of poor-quality spirometries over the years, resulting in a cost-effective program7; it has had a major impact on the quality of spirometries, and provides clinicians with a valid instrument to reach a correct diagnosis.


The program is included in the Osakidetza (Basque Public Health Service) portfolio of services.

Conflict of interests

The authors state that they have no conflict of interests.


We thank Juan Carlos Bayón and Asunción Gutiérrez (Osteba) for their review of our costing data.

F. Garcia-Río, M. Calle, F. Burgos, P. Casan, F. del Campo, J.B. Gáldiz, et al.
Normativa SEPAR.
Arch Bronconeumol., 49 (2013), pp. 388-401
F. Burgos.
La espirometría forzada de calidad en atención primaria, impacto en el tratamiento de la EPOC.
Arch Bronconeumol., 47 (2011), pp. 224-225
J. Hueto, P. Cebollero, I. Pascal, J.A. Cascante, V.M. Eguía, F. Teruel, et al.
La espirometría en atención primaria en Navarra.
Arch Bronconeumol., 42 (2006), pp. 326-331
K. Naberan, C. de la Roza, M. Lamban, E. Gobartt, A. Martín, M. Miravitlles.
Utilización de la espirometría en el diagnóstico y tratamiento de la EPOC en atención primaria.
Arch Bronconeumol., 42 (2006), pp. 638-644
F. Burgos, C. Disdier, E. López de Santa Maria, J.B. Galdiz, N. Roger, M.L. Rivera, et al.
Telemedicine enhances quality of forced spirometry in primary care.
Eur Respir J., 39 (2012), pp. 1313-1318
N. Marina, E. López de Santa María, A. Gutierrez, J.C. Bayón, L. Garcia, J.B. Gáldiz.
Telemedicine spirometry training and quality assurance program in primary care centers of a public health system.
Telemed J E Health., 20 (2014), pp. 388-392
N. Marina, J.C. Bayón, E. López de Santa María, A. Gutiérrez, M. Inchausti, V. Bustamante, et al.
Evaluación económica, impacto presupuestario, de un procedimiento de telemedicina para el control de calidad de las espirometrías en atención primaria.
Arch Bronconeumol., 52 (2016), pp. 24-28
N. Chavannes.
The necessity for spirometry in the primary care management of COPD.
Prim Care Respir J., 13 (2004), pp. 11-14
Alsina Restoy X, Marcos Sierra J, Rodríguez Fidalgo ML, Ruiz Rodríguez O, Ruiz-Serrano de la Espada MR, Torralba García Y, et al. Recomendaciones de prevención de infección por coronavirus en las unidades de función pulmonar de los diferentes ámbitos asistenciales: (Actualización del 20 de mayo 2020). [Accessed 20 May 2021]. Available from:
F. Burgos, J. Martínez, R. Cordovilla.
Impacto de la pandemia COVID-19 en los laboratorios de función pulmonar: consideraciones sobre el «hoy» y el «día después».
Arch Bronconeumol., 56 (2020), pp. 611-612
M. Bonavia, G. Averame, W. Canonica, C. Cricelli, V. Fogliani, C. Grassi, et al.
Feasibility and validation of telespirometry in general practice: the Italian "Alliance" study.
Respir Med., 103 (2009), pp. 1732-1737
J.F. Masa, M.T. Gonzalez, R. Pereira, M. Mota, J.A. Riesco, J. Corral, et al.
Validity of spirometry performed online.
Eur Respir J., 37 (2011), pp. 911-918
A. Berlinski, S.K. Chervinskiy, A.L. Simmons, P. Leisenring, S.A. Harwell, D.J. Lawrence, et al.
Delivery of high-quality pediatric spirometry in rural communities: a novel use for telemedicine.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract., 6 (2018), pp. 1042-1044
C. Represas-Represas, M. Botana-Rial, V. Leiro-Fernández, A.I. González-Silva, A. García-Martínez, A. Fernández-Villar.
Efectividad a corto y largo plazo de un programa tutelado de formación en espirometrías para profesionales de atención primaria.
L. Thijssing, J. van der Heijden, C. Melissant, N. Chavannes, L. Witkam, M. Jaspers.
Telepulmonology and telespirometry.
Stud H15ealth Technol Inform., 205 (2014), pp. 211-215
CONVOCATORIA 2015 CATÁLOGO de BUENAS PRÁCTICAS (BBPP) Aprobado por el Consejo Interterritorial del Sistema Nacional de Salud (CISNS) [Accessed 16 May 2021]. Available from:

Please cite this article as: Marina N, López de Santa María E, Martinez A, Andia J, Iriberri M, Gonzalez N, et al. Programa de telemedicina para el control de calidad de espirometrías en un sistema público de salud durante 10 años. Arch Bronconeumol. 2021;57:724–725.

Copyright © 2021. SEPAR
Archivos de Bronconeumología

Subscribe to our newsletter

Article options

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?