Journal Information
Vol. 58. Issue 7.
Pages 533-535 (July 2022)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
...
Vol. 58. Issue 7.
Pages 533-535 (July 2022)
Editorial
Full text access
Post Pulmonary Embolism Syndrome
Visits
...
Dieuwke Luijten, Cindy M.M. de Jong, Frederikus A. Klok
Corresponding author
f.a.klok@LUMC.nl

Corresponding author.
Department of Medicine – Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (1)
Full Text
Introduction

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a frequently occurring disease which has increased in incidence over the last years and is associated with considerable mortality.1 PE survivors are at risk for recurrent PE, anticoagulation-associated bleeding and cardiovascular events, but also face the possibility of developing persistent, sometimes disabling symptoms.2,3 Up to half of the PE patients report persistent dyspnea and/or functional limitations despite adequate anticoagulant treatment, qualifying for the post-PE syndrome (PPES).3–6 PPES is defined as the presence of any of the following, despite adequate anticoagulant treatment for ≥3 months: chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease (CTEPD), chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), post-PE cardiac dysfunction (characterized as persistent right ventricle impairment after an acute PE) or post-PE functional impairment.7 Post-PE functional impairment is the most frequent cause of PPES. The hypothesis of the pathophysiology of post-PE functional impairment is that less physical activity due to dyspnea after an acute PE results in deconditioning, leading to exercise limitation and further deconditioning.3–6,8,9 In addition, depressive disorders, fear for complications or recurrences and post-thrombotic panic syndrome further contribute to physical inactivity and impairment in both professional and social activities.10–12 Post-PE functional impairment has been shown to lower quality of life (QoL) and increase the risk of depression and subsequent permanent work-related disability.9,13–15 To improve the overall health outcomes of patients with acute PE, adequate measures to diagnose PPES and strategies to prevent and treat PPES are of the essence.

How to diagnose post-PE syndrome

The first priority in the management of patients with PPES is to diagnose CTEPH early, which will lead to improved survival and better quality of life by itself.16–18 Patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) are great tools to reproducibly evaluate the presence of persistent symptoms. This can be done by utilizing PROMS for specific symptoms such as dyspnea, but also by using the Post-VTE Functional Status (PVFS) scale, which measures persistent limitations in daily life following PE providing a holistic view on the patients’ recovery (Fig. 1).19,20 The PVFS scale captures the entire spectrum of functional outcomes in six scale grades, covering both limitations in usual activities or duties as well as changes in lifestyle.19,20

Fig. 1.

Flowchart for patient self-report of the Post-VTE Functional Status Scale.

(0.41MB).
Adapted from Boon et al.20 with permission.

The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines on PE recommend echocardiography as a first step in patients with persisting dyspnea, functional limitations or risk factors for CTEPH. A low probability of pulmonary hypertension on echocardiography reasonably rules out CTEPH.21 Another strategy for ruling out CTEPH is the use of a CTEPH prediction score and the CTEPH rule-out criteria to select patients in whom echocardiography is indicated.22–24 Assessing the index computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) for signs of CTEPH or chronic PE also contributes to the optimal selection of patients benefitting from early follow-up with echocardiography.25,26 A CTEPH diagnosis should always be confirmed by right heart catheterization.16 Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and spirometry can be used to identify an alternative explanation for persisting symptoms after an acute PE if CTEPH is ruled out.16

How to treat post-PE syndrome

Exercise training is suggested to be the ultimate treatment of PPES without CTEPH, CTEPD or other cardiopulmonary comorbidities. Indeed, several studies have shown that exercise therapy is safe and effective in PE patients.27–32 An Austrian study showed that patients who received a 6-week pulmonary exercise training (median time between PE event and start of rehabilitation of 19 weeks) had a significant improvement in 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT; mean difference 49.4meters) and self-reported symptom severity.29 A Dutch study showed that cardiopulmonary rehabilitation resulted in improved training intensity, PE-specific QoL, fatigue and PVFS scale grade.33

It has been suggested that in order to prevent deconditioning and consequently PPES, exercise training should be performed early after the PE diagnosis.

A Danish study compared an 8-week home-based exercise program 2–3 weeks after PE diagnosis with a control group. Results showed an improvement on Shuttle Walk test (SWT; mean difference 25 meters) and PE-specific QoL scores (mean difference 3.0 points) for the intervention group compared to the control group, but the primary hypothesis was rejected as group differences were nonsignificant.28 An Iranian randomized controlled trial (RCT) included 24 patients with intermediate-high risk acute PE: patients who received an 8-week high-intensity interval training showed a significant improvement of VO2max, right/left ventricle ratio diameter and health-related QoL compared to the control group.34 Notably, in these 2 studies, patients were not selected to participate based on presence and severity of symptoms, and patients with little or no remaining symptoms may have been included. Hence, it is likely that the benefit of an early exercise intervention will be more pronounced in patients who do not report to be largely recovered 2-4 weeks after the PE diagnosis.

Long COVID

Similar to PPES, a large number of 22-96% of patients with COVID-19 suffer from persistent symptoms after an acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, qualifying for ‘long Corona Virus Infection Disease-19’ or ‘long COVID’.35–42 The pathophysiology of long COVID is unknown, but is likely multifactorial. Since the incidence of thromboembolic events in COVID-19 is high43–45, PPES may be a relevant determinant of long COVID.42 As with post-PE functional impairment, reduced exercise capacity associated with deconditioning likely also plays an important role.46,47 To identify patients with functional impairment, the Post-COVID-19 Functional Status (PCFS) scale can be used.48 The PCFS scale, based on the PVFS scale, has been applied in several studies investigating functioning after COVID-1949–52 and its good reliability and construct validity have been demonstrated.53–56 In line with PPES, after CTEPH and CTEPD have been ruled out, rehabilitation programs may contribute to a reduction of symptoms of long COVID.57–60 For instance, one RCT has demonstrated improvement in respiratory function, QoL, and anxiety after a 6-week respiratory rehabilitation program after hospital discharge in elderly post-COVID-19 patients (aged ≥65 years).61

Conclusion

PPES includes a broad spectrum of clinical presentations, of which CTEPH is the most rare but also most relevant with regard to survival. Applying PROMS is very helpful for standardizing follow-up, for instance using the PVFS scale. In PPES patients, without CTEPH and CTEPD, cardiopulmonary rehabilitation provides a good treatment option. Further studies are required to increase our understanding of optimally selecting patients for and optimal timing of exercise interventions.

References
[1]
S. Barco, S.H. Mahmoudpour, L. Valerio, F.A. Klok, T. Münzel, S. Middeldorp, et al.
Trends in mortality related to pulmonary embolism in the European Region, 2000–15: analysis of vital registration data from the WHO Mortality Database.
Lancet Respir Med, 8 (2020), pp. 277-287
[2]
F.A. Klok, W. Zondag, K.W. van Kralingen, A.P. van Dijk, J.T. Tamsma, F.H. Heyning, et al.
Patient outcomes after acute pulmonary embolism. A pooled survival analysis of different adverse events.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 181 (2010), pp. 501-506
[3]
F.A. Klok, T. van der Hulle, P.L. den Exter, M. Lankeit, M.V. Huisman, S.AT The post-PE syndrome: a new concept for chronic complications of pulmonary embolism Konstantinides.
Blood Rev, 28 (2014), pp. 221-226
[4]
A.K. Sista, L.E. Miller, S.R. Kahn, J.A.AT Persistent right ventricular dysfunction, functional capacity limitation, exercise intolerance, and quality of life impairment following pulmonary embolism: systematic review with meta-analysis Kline.
Vasc Med, 22 (2017), pp. 37-43
[5]
F.A. Klok, S. Barco.
Follow-up after acute pulmonary embolism.
Hamostaseologie, 38 (2018), pp. 22-32
[6]
G.J.A.M. Boon, M.V. Huisman, F.A. Klok.
Determinants and management of the post-pulmonary embolism syndrome.
Semin Respir Crit Care Med, 42 (2021), pp. 299-307
[7]
C. Le GalG, M. Carrier, L.A. Castellucci, A. Cuker, J.B. Hansen, F.A. Klok, ISTH CDE Task Force, et al.
Development and implementation of common data elements for venous thromboembolism research: Official Communication from the SSC of the ISTH.
J Thromb Haemost, 19 (2021), pp. 297-303
[8]
F.A. Klok, K.W. van Kralingen, A.P. van Dijk, F.H. Heyning, H.W. Vliegen, M.V.AT Prevalence and potential determinants of exertional dyspnea after acute pulmonary embolism Huisman.
Respir Med, 104 (2010), pp. 1744-1749
[9]
S.R. Kahn, A.M. Hirsch, A. Akaberi, P. Hernandez, D.R. Anderson, P.S. Wells, et al.
Functional and exercise limitations after a first episode of pulmonary embolism: results of the ELOPE prospective cohort study.
Chest, 151 (2017), pp. 1058-1068
[10]
R. Hunter, S. Noble, S. Lewis, P.AT Long-term psychosocial impact of venous thromboembolism: a qualitative study in the community Bennett.
[11]
I. Kirchberger, S. Ruile, J. Linseisen, S. Haberl, C. Meisinger, T.M.AT The lived experience with pulmonary embolism: a qualitative study using focus groups Berghaus.
Respir Med, 167 (2020),
[12]
J.S. Danielsbacka, L. Rostberg, M.F. Olsén, K.AT “Whole life changed” – experiences of how symptoms derived from acute pulmonary embolism affects life. A qualitative interview study Mannerkorpi.
Thromb Res, 205 (2021), pp. 56-62
[13]
F.A. Klok, K.W. van Kralingen, A.P.J. van Dijk, F.H. Heyning, H.W. Vliegen, A.A. Kaptein, et al.
Quality of life in long-term survivors of acute pulmonary embolism.
Chest, 138 (2010), pp. 1432-1440
[14]
L. Valerio, S. Barco, M. Jankowski, S. Rosenkranz, M. Lankeit, M. Held, et al.
Quality of life 3 and 12 months following acute pulmonary embolism: analysis from a prospective multicenter cohort study.
Chest, 159 (2021), pp. 2428-2438
[15]
K. Keller, C. Tesche, A. Gerhold-Ay, S. Nickels, F.A. Klok, L. Rappold, et al.
Quality of life and functional limitations after pulmonary embolism and its prognostic relevance.
J Thromb Haemost, 17 (2019), pp. 1923-1934
[16]
M. Delcroix, A. Torbicki, D. Gopalan, O. Sitbon, F.A. Klok, I. Lang, et al.
ERS statement on chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.
Eur Respir J, 57 (2020),
[17]
F.A. Klok, S. Barco, S.V. Konstantinides, P. DArtevelle, E. Fadel, D. Jenkins, et al.
Determinants of diagnostic delay in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: results from the European CTEPH Registry.
[18]
G.J.A.M. Boon, W.B. van den Hout, S. Barco, H.J. Bogaard, M. Delcroix, M.V. Huisman, et al.
A model for estimating the health economic impact of earlier diagnosis of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.
ERJ Open Res, 7 (2021),
[19]
F.A. Klok, S. Barco, B. Siegerink.
Measuring functional limitations after venous thromboembolism: a call to action.
Thromb Res, 178 (2019), pp. 59-62
[20]
G.J.A.M. Boon, S. Barco, L. Bertoletti, W. Ghanima, M.V. Huisman, S.R. Kahn, et al.
Measuring functional limitations after venous thromboembolism: optimization of the Post-VTE Functional Status (PVFS) Scale.
Thromb Res, 190 (2020), pp. 45-51
[21]
S.V. Konstantinides, G. Meyer, C. Becattini, H. Bueno, G.J. Geersing, V.P. Harjola, et al.
2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European. Respiratory Society (ERS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).
Eur Respir J, 54 (2019),
[22]
F.A. Klok, S. Surie, T. Kempf, J. Eikenboom, J.P. van Straalen, K.W. van Kralingen, et al.
A simple non-invasive diagnostic algorithm for ruling out chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension in patients after acute pulmonary embolism.
Thromb Res, 128 (2011), pp. 21-26
[23]
F.A. Klok, O. Dzikowska-Diduch, M. Kostrubiec, H.W. Vliegen, P. Pruszczyk, G. Hasenfuß, et al.
Derivation of a clinical prediction score for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after acute pulmonary embolism.
J Thromb Haemost, 14 (2016), pp. 121-128
[24]
G. Boon, Y.M. Ende-Verhaar, R. Bavalia, L.H. Bouazzaoui, M. Delcroix, O. Dzikowska-Diduch, et al.
Non-invasive early exclusion of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after acute pulmonary embolism: the InShape II study.
[25]
G. Boon, P.M. Jairam, G.M.C. Groot, C.J. van Rooden, Y.M. Ende-Verhaar, L.F.M. Beenen, et al.
Identification of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension on CTPAs performed for diagnosing acute pulmonary embolism depending on level of expertise.
Eur J Intern Med, (2021),
[26]
Y.M. Ende-Verhaar, L.J. Meijboom, L.J.M. Kroft, L.F.M. Beenen, G. Boon, S. Middeldorp, et al.
Usefulness of standard computed tomography pulmonary angiography performed for acute pulmonary embolism for identification of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: results of the InShape III study.
J Heart Lung Transplant, 38 (2019), pp. 731-738
[27]
R.S. Cires-Drouet, M. Mayorga-Carlin, S. Toursavadkohi, R. White, E. Redding, F. Durham, et al.
Safety of exercise therapy after acute pulmonary embolism.
Phlebology, 35 (2020), pp. 824-832
[28]
N. Rolving, B.C. Brocki, J.R. Bloch-Nielsen, T.B. Larsen, F.L. Jensen, H.R. Mikkelsen, et al.
Effect of a physiotherapist-guided home-based exercise intervention on physical capacity and patient-reported outcomes among patients with acute pulmonary embolism: a randomized clinical trial.
[29]
S. Nopp, F.A. Klok, F. Moik, M. Petrovic, I. Derka, C. Ay, et al.
Outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with persisting symptoms after pulmonary embolism.
J Clin Med, 9 (2020), pp. 1811
[30]
M. Amoury, F. Noack, K. Kleeberg, D. Stoevesandt, B. Lehnigk, S. Bethge, et al.
Prognosis of patients with pulmonary embolism after rehabilitation.
Vasc Health Risk Manag, 14 (2018), pp. 183-187
[31]
F. Noack, B. Schmidt, M. Amoury, D. Stoevesandt, S. Gielen, B. Pflaumbaum, et al.
Feasibility and safety of rehabilitation after venous thromboembolism.
Vasc Health Risk Manag, 11 (2015), pp. 397-401
[32]
S.G. Lakoski, P.D. Savage, A.M. Berkman, L. Penalosa, A. Crocker, P.A. Ades, et al.
The safety and efficacy of early-initiation exercise training after acute venous thromboembolism: a randomized clinical trial.
J Thromb Haemost, 13 (2015), pp. 1238-1244
[33]
G. Boon, S.M.J. Janssen, S. Barco, H.J. Bogaard, W. Ghanima, L.J.M. Kroft, et al.
Efficacy and safety of a 12-week outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program in Post-PE Syndrome.
Thromb Res, 206 (2021), pp. 66-75
[34]
A. Ghram, Y. Jenab, R. Soori, S. Choobineh, A. Hosseinsabet, S. Niyazi, et al.
High-intensity interval training in patients with pulmonary embolism: a randomized controlled trial.
[35]
S. Bliddal, K. Banasik, O.B. Pedersen, J. Nissen, L. Cantwell, M. Schwinn, et al.
Acute and persistent symptoms in non-hospitalized PCR-confirmed COVID-19 patients.
[36]
A. Carfì, R. Bernabei, F. Landi.
Persistent symptoms in patients after acute COVID-19.
JAMA, 324 (2020), pp. 603-605
[37]
V. Chopra, S.A. Flanders, M. O’Malley, A.N. Malani, H.C.AT Sixty-day outcomes among patients hospitalized with COVID-19 Prescott.
Ann Intern Med, 174 (2021), pp. 576-578
[38]
H. Crook, S. Raza, J. Nowell, M. Young, P.AT Long covid-mechanisms, risk factors, and management Edison.
BMJ, 374 (2021), pp. n1648
[39]
H.E. Davis, G.S. Assaf, L. McCorkell, H. Wei, R.J. Low, Y. Re’em, et al.
Characterizing long COVID in an international cohort: 7 months of symptoms and their impact.
EClinicalMedicine, 38 (2021), pp. 101019
[40]
C. Huang, L. Huang, Y. Wang, X. Li, L. Ren, X. Gu, et al.
6-Month consequences of COVID-19 in patients discharged from hospital: a cohort study.
[41]
R. Naeije, S. Caravita.
Phenotyping long COVID.
Eur Respir J, 58 (2021), pp. 2101763
[42]
A. Nalbandian, K. Sehgal, A. Gupta, M.V. Madhavan, C. McGroder, J.S. Stevens, et al.
Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome.
Nat Med, 27 (2021), pp. 601-615
[43]
F.A. Klok, M. Kruip, N.J.M. van der Meer, M.S. Arbous, D. Gommers, K.M. Kant, et al.
Incidence of thrombotic complications in critically ill ICU patients with COVID-19.
Thromb Res, 191 (2020), pp. 145-147
[44]
F.H.J. Kaptein, M.A.M. Stals, M. Grootenboers, S.J.E. Braken, J.L.I. Burggraaf, B.C.T. van Bussel, et al.
Incidence of thrombotic complications and overall survival in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in the second and first wave.
Thromb Res, 199 (2021), pp. 143-148
[45]
S. Nopp, F. Moik, B. Jilma, I. Pabinger, C. Ay, et al.
Risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Res Pract Thromb Haemost, 4 (2020), pp. 1178-1191
[46]
R. Francesco Rinaldo, M. Mondoni, E. Maria Parazzini, F. Pitari, E. Brambilla, S. Luraschi, et al.
Deconditioning as main mechanism of impaired exercise response in COVID-19 survivors.
[47]
H. Humphreys, L. Kilby, N. Kudiersky, R.AT Long COVID and the role of physical activity: a qualitative study Copeland.
[48]
F.A. Klok, G. Boon, S. Barco, M. Endres, J.J.M. Geelhoed, S. Knauss, et al.
The Post-COVID-19 Functional Status scale: a tool to measure functional status over time after COVID-19.
Eur Respir J, 56 (2020),
[49]
M. Taboada, A. Cariñena, E. Moreno, N. Rodríguez, M.J. Domínguez, A. Casal, et al.
Post-COVID-19 functional status six-months after hospitalization.
J Infect, 82 (2021), pp. e31-e33
[50]
A.W. Vaes, Y.M.J. Goërtz, M. Van Herck, F.V.C. Machado, R. Meys, J.M. Delbressine, et al.
Recovery from COVID-19: a sprint or marathon? 6-Month follow-up data from online long COVID-19 support group members.
ERJ Open Res, 7 (2021),
[51]
R.F. D’Cruz, M.D. Waller, F. Perrin, J. Periselneris, S. Norton, L.J. Smith, et al.
Chest radiography is a poor predictor of respiratory symptoms and functional impairment in survivors of severe COVID-19 pneumonia.
ERJ Open Res, 7 (2021), pp. 00655-2020
[52]
Du H, Fang S, Wu S, Chen X. Six-month follow-up of functional status in discharged patients with coronavirus disease 2019. PREPRINT (Version 1). Available from: Research Square. 2020. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-132296/v1.
[53]
F.V.C. Machado, R. Meys, J.M. Delbressine, A.W. Vaes, Y.M.J. Goërtz, M. van Herck, et al.
Construct validity of the Post-COVID-19 Functional Status Scale in adult subjects with COVID-19.
Health Qual Life Outcomes, 19 (2021), pp. 40
[54]
E. Çalik Kütükcü, A. Çakmak, E. Kinaci, O.A. Uyaroğlu, N. Vardar Yağli, G. Sain Güven, et al.
Reliability and validity of the turkish version of post-COVID-19 functional status scale.
Turk J Med Sci, (2021),
[55]
L.A. Lorca, R. Torres-Castro, I.L. Ribeiro, P. Benavente, M. Pizarro, B. San Cristobal, et al.
Linguistic validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the post-COVID-19 functional status scale for the chilean population.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 100 (2021), pp. 313-320
[56]
L.A.R.I. Lorca, R. Torres-Castro, C. Sacomori, C. Rivera.
Psychometric properties of the post-COVID-19 functional status scale for adult COVID-19 survivors.
Rehabilitacion (Madr), (2021),
[57]
A. Jimeno-Almazán, J.G. Pallarés, Á. Buendía-Romero, A. Martínez-Cava, F. Franco-López, B.J. Sánchez-Alcaraz Martínez, et al.
Post-COVID-19 syndrome and the potential benefits of exercise.
Int J Environ Res Public Health, 18 (2021), pp. 5329
[58]
S.J. Yong.
Long COVID or post-COVID-19 syndrome: putative pathophysiology, risk factors, and treatments.
Infect Dis (Lond), 53 (2021), pp. 737-754
[59]
O.L. Aiyegbusi, S.E. Hughes, G. Turner, S.C. Rivera, C. McMullan, J.S. Chandan, et al.
Symptoms, complications and management of long COVID: a review.
J R Soc Med, (2021),
[60]
Z. Yan, M. Yang, C.L. Lai.
Long COVID-19 syndrome: a comprehensive review of its effect on various organ systems and recommendation on rehabilitation plans.
Biomedicines, 9 (2021), pp. 966
[61]
K. Liu, W. Zhang, Y. Yang, J. Zhang, Y. Li, Y.AT Respiratory rehabilitation in elderly patients with COVID-19: a randomized controlled study Chen.
Complement Ther Clin Pract, 39 (2020), pp. 101166
Copyright © 2021. SEPAR
Archivos de Bronconeumología

Subscribe to our newsletter

Article options
Tools

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?