Emerging biological therapies for treating chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A pairwise and network meta-analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pupt.2018.03.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is often corticosteroid resistant and, thus, alternative anti-inflammatory approaches are needed. Since it is still not clear whether blocking specific pro-inflammatory factors may provide clinical benefit in COPD, we have performed a meta-analysis to quantify the impact of monoclonal antibodies (mABs) targeting the cytokine/chemokine-mediated inflammation in COPD.

A pairwise and network meta-analyses were performed by extracting data from randomized clicnial trials on COPD concerning the impact of mABs vs. placebo on the risk of exacerbation, forced expiratory volume in 1ā€Æs (FEV1), and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ).

Data on the interleukin (IL)-1Ī² antagonist canakinumab, IL-1R1 antagonist MEDI8986, IL-5 antagonist mepolizumab, IL-5R antagonist benralizumab, IL-8 antagonist ABX-IL8, and TNF-Ī± antagonist infliximab were found. Overall, mAB therapy had a moderate impact on the risk exacerbation, but not on FEV1 and SGRQ. The pairwise meta-analysis performed in eosinophilic patients, and the network approach, indicated that mepolizumab elicited a beneficial effect against the risk of exacerbation, whereas benralizumab was more effective in improving both FEV1 and SGRQ.

This study demonstrates that targeting the pathway activated by IL-5 may have a beneficial impact in eosinophilic COPD patients.

Introduction

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an inflammatory disorder in which the persistent respiratory symptoms and airflow limitation are due to a complex chronic inflammation that predominantly affects peripheral airways and lung parenchyma [1,2].

The inflammatory response to noxious particle and/or gases is prevalently orchestrated by the activation of inflammatory cells such as alveolar macrophages, neutrophils, T lymphocytes, and innate lymphoid cells recruited from the circulation. Furthermore, in some COPD patients there may also be increases in eosinophils. These inflammatory and structural cells, including epithelial and endothelial cells and fibroblasts, secrete several cytokines and chemokines [3]. These mediators have a relevant role in the pathogenesis and progression of COPD, since they recruit inflammatory cells from the circulation into the lungs, maintain inflammation, and lead to characteristic structural changes in the airways [2,3].

Relevant advances have been achieved for the identification of multiple cytokines and chemokines involved in chronic inflammatory disorders, but the effort to characterize a specific inflammatory profile in patients with COPD produced conflicting results [3]. In fact, some studies suggested that COPD is mainly characterized by a T-helper (Th)-1 and T-cytotoxic (Tc)-1 subtype (Th1/Tc1) pattern, whereas further researches found a predominant Th2/Tc2 phenotype [2]. Therefore, the cluster of cytokines and chemokines that orchestrate inflammation in COPD may involve tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-Ī±, interleukin (IL)-1Ī², IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-13 IL-17, IL-18, IL-23, IL-33, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), and growth factors such as transforming growth factor (TGF)-Ī² [2].

Little progress has been made in understanding the role of these factors in COPD, and how the multiple cytokine and chemokine network operate [3]. Nevertheless, the inhibition of these mediators, and the pathways that they activate, may represent a potential strategy to modulate the inflammatory processes that sustains the progression of COPD [4]. Moreover, since inflammation in COPD is largely corticosteroid resistant, alternative anti-inflammatory approaches are strongly needed [5,6]. Unfortunately, the currently available alternative anti-inflammatory strategies approved for the treatment of COPD are often limited by several transient mild-to-moderate adverse events, that may reduce the compliance to treatment [1,7]. As a consequence, to date there is a huge unmet medical need with regard to effective and well tolerated anti-inflammatory agents for treating patients with COPD [8].

Blocking cytokine and chemokines, their synthesis, antagonizing their receptors and targeting intracellular signalling pathways by using monoclonal antibodies (mABs) is a biological therapeutic approach that has been successful in the treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases, namely severe asthma, rheumatoid arthritis, and inflammatory bowel disease [6].

Indeed, mABs have advantages over small molecules, such as the high affinity and specificity for their targets, and the metabolic stability that allows them to be active for long time and have a long duration of action (from weeks to months). Furthermore, since their breakdown products are amino acids, they are not converted into toxic metabolites [9,10]. Consequently, several biological inhibitors of inflammatory mediators have been developed for targeting the cytokine/chemokine-mediated inflammation in COPD [2].

To date, it is still not clear whether blocking specific cytokines and chemokines may provide clinical benefit in COPD patients [3]. Therefore, we have performed a pairwise meta-analysis aimed to quantify the overall impact of mABs tested in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with regard to functional and clinical outcomes of COPD. Furthermore, we have also carried out a network approach to compare and rank the effectiveness of specific mABs on the risk of COPD exacerbation, lung function, and health-related quality of life in eosinophilic COPD pateints.

Section snippets

Search strategy

This pairwise and network meta-analysis has been registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42017073945; available at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42017073945), and performed in agreement with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement (Fig. 1) [11]. Furthermore, this synthesis satisfied all the recommended items reported by the PRISMA-P 2015 checklist [12].

We undertook a comprehensive literature search for RCTs

Studies characteristics

Results obtained from 2453 COPD patients (1375 were treated with a mAB and 1078 with placebo) were selected from 7 studies carried out on canakinumab [30], MEDI8986 [31], mepolizumab [32,33], benralizumab [34], ABX-IL8 [35], and infliximab [36]. Only the studies that investigated mepolizumab and benralizumab reported also information on sputum and/or blood eosinophil count (1434 patients had an eosinophilic phenotype) [[32], [33], [34]].

Three studies on TNF-Ī± antagonists were excluded from this

Discussion

The overall results of this quantitative synthesis indicate that mABs provide a weak, although significant, beneficial effect when administered to moderate-to-severe COPD patients. In particular, the pairwise meta-analysis demonstrates that mAB therapy induced a moderate reduction of the risk of COPD exacerbation, but did not significantly modulate neither the change in FEV1 nor SGRQ, compared to placebo.

However, the analysis of the effect estimates resulting from the analysis of eosinophilic

Conclusions

Cytokines and chemokines play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis and development of COPD. Nevertheless, nowadays the mABs directed against these mediators have provided only little or no evidence of therapeutic effectiveness with regard to functional and clinical outcomes of COPD, such as exacerbation rate, lung function and health-related quality of life. Although this scenario confirms the complexity and heterogeneity of COPD in which no dominant cytokine and/or chemokines seems to be

Declaration of interest

None.

Conflicts of interest

PR, MGM, EP, MC and LC have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in, or financial conflict with, the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript, including employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Funding sources

This study was supported by institutional funds (University of Rome ā€œTor Vergataā€, Rome, Italy).

Acknowledgements

None.

References (47)

  • C.A. Rizzo et al.

    The IL-5 receptor on human bronchus selectively primes for hyperresponsiveness

    J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.

    (2002)
  • GOLD

    Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. Global Strategy for Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of COPD ā€“ 2018 Report

    (2018)
  • M.G. Matera et al.

    Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

    Drugs

    (2016)
  • G. Caramori et al.

    Cytokine inhibition in the treatment of COPD

    Int. J. Chronic Obstr. Pulm. Dis.

    (2014)
  • P.J. Barnes

    Development of new drugs for COPD

    Curr. Med. Chem.

    (2013)
  • P. Rogliani et al.

    Drug safety evaluation of roflumilast for the treatment of COPD: a meta-analysis

    Expet Opin. Drug Saf.

    (2016)
  • M. Cazzola et al.

    Emerging anti-inflammatory strategies for COPD

    Eur. Respir. J.

    (2012)
  • R.C. Fellner et al.

    Inhaled protein/peptide-based therapies for respiratory disease

    Mol. Cell. Pediatr.

    (2016)
  • P. Chames et al.

    Therapeutic antibodies: successes, limitations and hopes for the future

    Br. J. Pharmacol.

    (2009)
  • D. Moher et al.

    Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement

    Open Med.

    (2009)
  • D. Moher et al.

    Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement

    Syst. Rev.

    (2015)
  • H. Pedder et al.

    Data extraction for complex meta-analysis (DECiMAL) guide

    Syst. Rev.

    (2016)
  • J.P.T. Higgins et al.

    Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0

    (2011)
  • Cited by (12)

    • A systematic review and integrated analysis of biologics that target Type 2 inflammation to treat COPD with increased peripheral blood eosinophils

      2022, Heliyon
      Citation Excerpt :

      Five meta-analyses for biologics in patients with COPD were published to-date. Rogliani et al. conducted a meta-analysis of biologics with differing mechanisms of action, including anti-IL-5, anti-IL-5 receptor Ī±, ant-IL-1Ī², anti-IL-1 receptor 1, anti-IL-8, and anti-tumor necrosis factor-Ī± mAbs [12]. Unfortunately, their analysis double counted placebos in the three-group comparison of the METREO trial for mepolizumab.

    • COPD Therapy: Beyond Conventional Pharmacology

      2020, Archivos de Bronconeumologia
    • Novel Anti-Inflammatory Approaches to COPD

      2023, International Journal of COPD
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text