Elsevier

International Journal of Cardiology

Volume 197, 15 October 2015, Pages 162-163
International Journal of Cardiology

Letter to the Editor
Risk stratification of normotensive pulmonary embolism based on the sPESI — Does it work for all patients?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.06.065Get rights and content

Section snippets

Conflict of interest

The authors report no relationships that could be construed as a conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. Dr. Joachim Lotz, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Germany and German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), partner site Göttingen for images shown in Fig. 1.

The study was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF 01EO1003). The authors are responsible for the contents of this publication.

References (9)

  • M. Righini et al.

    The Simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI): validation of a clinical prognostic model for pulmonary embolism

    J. Thromb. Haemost.

    (2011)
  • S.V. Konstantinides et al.

    ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism

    Eur. Heart J.

    (2014)
  • M. Lankeit et al.

    Predictive value of the high-sensitivity troponin T assay and the simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index in hemodynamically stable patients with acute pulmonary embolism: a prospective validation study

    Circulation

    (2011)
  • M. Lankeit et al.

    Validation of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide cut-off values for risk stratification of pulmonary embolism

    Eur. Respir. J.

    (2014)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (16)

  • Factor Xa inhibition and sPESI failure in intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism

    2018, American Journal of Emergency Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    We report one patient with THROMBI involving apixaban loading dose failure, where successful thrombolysis was performed 12 h after the last apixaban dose. Importantly, despite PE severity, simplified pulmonary embolism severity index (sPESI) failed twice to stratify risk in two consecutive ED admissions [11]. Considering the limited evidence of NOACs efficacy in THROMBI [1, 2] and the lack of safety recommendations in patients on NOACs who require urgent thrombolysis [12, 13], we performed a systematic review.

  • Risk stratification of acute pulmonary embolism based on clinical parameters, H-FABP and multidetector CT

    2018, International Journal of Cardiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    For those patients, hospital admission and close monitoring seems reasonable, and according to the guidelines, thrombolysis might be considered, if signs of haemodynamic decompensation appear [2]. On the other hand, it has recently been debated, whether risk assessment of low risk patients should only rely on a clinical score [31]. In our cohort, the complication rate for an adverse 30-day outcome was 1.1% in patients with sPESI of 0.

  • High-sensitivity troponin and right ventricular function in acute pulmonary embolism

    2016, American Journal of Emergency Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    There is sufficient evidence about the poor outcome of patients presenting hypotension with or without shock. However, most patients are normotensive and 70% are considered at intermediate risk, according to the scores recommended by the guidelines [17–21]. TAPSE has been validated as a prognostic parameter in PE, is easy to measure and has very low interobserver variability [8,22]; yet, it requires a bedside ultrasound, which is not available in many emergency departments.

  • Management of Pulmonary Embolism: An Update

    2016, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    These criteria await validation in larger cohorts and further countries. Importantly, and in view of first reports that severe right ventricular dysfunction may occasionally be present in a patient with a negative sPESI (21), it will also need to be determined in this context whether CT or echocardiographic imaging of the right ventricle should be added to clinical eligibility criteria for immediate or early discharge in order to maximize patient safety. What are the next steps if a normotensive patient is not classified into the low-risk category on the basis of the clinical criteria described previously?

View all citing articles on Scopus
1

The authors contributed equally.

View full text