Elsevier

Heart & Lung

Volume 44, Issue 4, July–August 2015, Pages 327-334
Heart & Lung

Care of Patients With Pulmonary Disorders
Prognostic value of troponins in acute nonmassive pulmonary embolism: A meta-analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2015.03.007Get rights and content

Abstract

The objective of our meta-analysis is to update the evidence on the prognostic value of elevated troponin levels in patient with acute normotensive pulmonary embolism (PE). We did a systematic literature review of database, including Pubmed, EMBASE, and Cochrane. Studies were included if those were done on normotensive patients with acute PE and serum troponin assay was done. The primary end point was short term all cause mortality. The secondary end points were short term PE related mortality and serious adverse events. Elevated troponin levels were significantly associated with the increased risk for short term mortality (odds ratio [OR], 4.80; 95% CI, 3.25–7.08, I2 = 54%), PE related mortality (OR, 3.80; 95% CI, 2.74–5.27, I2 = 0%) and serious adverse events (OR, 3.65; 95% CI, 2.41–5.53, I2 = 47%). Our study suggests that elevated levels of troponin identify a subgroup of patients with increased risk for short term mortality and serious adverse events.

Introduction

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third leading cause of cardiovascular death.1 Acute PE has a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations and prognosis. The clinical presentation of acute PE varies from sudden death to cardiogenic shock to asymptomatic. Mortality attributable to PE ranges from 9% in patients who are hemodynamically unstable at the time of presentation to about 3% in patients who are stable in current era.2 So far, guidelines exist for treating hemodynamically unstable patients with thrombolytics because of high risk for short term mortality; however, we are still lacking in a prognostic strategy which can identify a subgroup of patients who are hemodynamically stable but at risk for poor outcomes.3 Risk stratification at the time of admission is important for the appropriate management of patients with acute PE. On one side of the spectrum are the patients who are normotensive at the time of admission and very low risk for death, who could be managed as an outpatient with newer anticoagulants. On the other side of the spectrum are the patients who are at risk for poor outcomes and need close monitoring and may benefit from more aggressive treatment like thrombolytics. Optimal management of these patients can lead to decrease health care cost and increased patient satisfaction.4 Patients who are hemodynamically stable at the time of admission, but manifest right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) have a poor prognosis when compared to patients without RVD.5, 6 Various clinical, imaging and serum biomarkers have been evaluated to identify a subgroup of patients who have RVD and are at high risk for poor outcomes. Echocardiogram is a useful tool in risk stratification in acute PE by diagnosing RVD; however, it is not available round the clock in all institutions. Also, the prognostic value of echocardiogram for RVD in predicting short term mortality is too low to be useful in clinical practice.7 Several serum biomarkers such as troponin, Brain Natriuretic peptide (BNP) or N terminal pro-BNP (NT-pro BNP), Heart-type fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP) has also been evaluated to identify patients with poor outcomes but the best prognostic tool is still unknown to date.8, 9, 10, 11 Previous meta-analysis on the use of troponin in patients with acute PE included few studies with small patient population size and the results were unsatisfactory for clinical usefulness in risk stratification.8 We aimed to update the meta-analysis by adding seventeen more studies with larger patient population to further clarify whether elevated cardiac troponin levels are useful in clinical decision making.

Section snippets

Study objectives

The primary objective of this meta-analysis was to update the evidence whether elevated troponin levels (T or I) are useful in predicting short term (in-hospital or 30 day) all cause mortality in normotensive patients with acute PE. The secondary objectives were to assess whether elevated troponin levels are useful in predicting short term mortality (in-hospital or 30 day) resulting from PE and serious adverse events.

Data source and searches

A systematic search of Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane Database were performed.

Results

Overall, 2560 articles were found until December 2014. Out of 2560 articles screened, only 26 studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria and included in our analysis.12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 21 studies included patients with hypotension or hemodynamic instability at the time of admission and excluded from our analysis. Review articles, editorials, duplicates and abstracts were excluded. There were 6 studies which

All cause mortality

Twenty three studies reported all cause mortality data (Fig. 2). The overall mortality rate in acute PE was 5.7%. 274 of 2596 patients with elevated troponin levels and 143 out of 4707 with normal troponin levels died (10.5% versus 3.1%). Elevated troponin (T or I) levels were significantly associated with higher risk of death as compared to normal troponin levels (OR, 4.80; 95% CI, 3.25–7.08, I2 = 54%). Excluding three retrospective studies revealed the same results (OR, 4.69; 95% CI,

Discussion

Our meta-analysis shows that elevated troponin levels are associated with a fivefold increased risk for all cause short term mortality and about fourfold increased risk for serious adverse events. Our results are in agreement with the previous review of Jimenez et al. Our meta-analysis included total of 26 studies (with 23 studies reported primary end point) as compared to 9 studies in the previous review. All the studies included in our review resulted in similar findings. Even though elevated

Strengths

Studies were extensively searched independently by two authors and clarified by a third author for methods and outcomes. Authors were contacted to get the missing data to complete the analysis. Studies were extensively screened and duplicated and partially duplicated cohorts were removed after contacting the authors. Random-effect models were used for wider confidence interval and between study and within study variation. The likelihood ratios, which best describes the discriminatory power of

Limitations

The major limitation of our study is that our pooled analyses were not adjusted for confounding variables such as age, gender etc. The second limitation is that the threshold for abnormal values of troponin and assay differed across studies. Third, there was some heterogeneity in the OR of primary end point results which could have weakened the conclusion of our analysis somewhat.

Conclusion

Elevated levels of troponin identify subgroups of patients with increased risk for short term mortality and serious adverse events; however, the results are not satisfactory enough to make any change in current clinical practice. hs-cTnT may be a useful biomarker in conjunction with clinical tools in helping clinicians decide to recommend outpatient management and that will substantially reduce health care cost. More data is needed to define the role of hs-cTnT in acute PE.

References (43)

  • L. Moores et al.

    Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index and troponin testing for the selection of low-risk patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism

    J Thromb Haemost

    (2010)
  • N. Vuilleumier et al.

    Cardiac biomarkers for risk stratification in non-massive pulmonary embolism: a multicenter prospective study

    J Thromb Haemost

    (2009)
  • C. Bova et al.

    Risk stratification and outcomes in hemodynamically stable patients with acute pulmonary embolism: a prospective, multicentre, cohort study with three months of follow-up

    J Thromb Haemost

    (2009)
  • I.I. Tulevski et al.

    Combined utility of brain natriuretic peptide and cardiac troponin T may improve rapid triage and risk stratification in normotensive patients with pulmonary embolism

    Int J Cardiol

    (2007)
  • J.D. Douketis et al.

    The incidence and prognostic significance of elevated cardiac troponins in patients with submassive pulmonary embolism

    J Thromb Haemost

    (2005)
  • P. Pruszczyk et al.

    Cardiac troponin T monitoring identifies high-risk group of normotensive patients with acute pulmonary embolism

    Chest

    (2003)
  • D.A. Grimes et al.

    Refining clinical diagnosis with likelihood ratios

    Lancet

    (2005)
  • S. Laporte et al.

    Clinical predictors for fatal pulmonary embolism in 15,520 patients with venous thromboembolism: findings from the Registro Informatizado de la Enfermedad Tromboembolica Venosa (RIETE) Registry

    Circulation

    (2008)
  • M.R. Jaff et al.

    Management of massive and submassive pulmonary embolism, iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis, and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

    Circulation

    (2011)
  • N. Kucher et al.

    Prognostic role of echocardiography among patients with acute pulmonary embolism and a systolic arterial pressure of 90 mm Hg or higher

    Arch Intern Med

    (2005)
  • S. Grifoni et al.

    Short-term clinical outcome of patients with acute pulmonary embolism, normal blood pressure, and echocardiographic right ventricular dysfunction

    Circulation

    (2000)
  • Cited by (0)

    Name of Institute where Study was performed: The Wright Center for Graduate Medical Education, 501 Madison Avenue, Scranton, PA 18505, USA.

    Financial support: There was no financial support provided by any institution for this study.

    Conflict of interest: No conflict of interest.

    View full text