Elsevier

Cancer Treatment Reviews

Volume 53, February 2017, Pages 128-137
Cancer Treatment Reviews

Anti-Tumour Treatment
Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in non-small cell lung cancer patients: A continuing challenge in the personalized treatment era

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.12.006Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Incidence of LM is 3.8% in the overall NSCLC population, and 9% in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients.

  • Prognosis remains poor, even with the use of personalized treatments.

  • Systemic treatment and intrathecal chemotherapy is an appropriate strategy for treating LM.

  • In molecularly-selected patients the best strategy remains unknown.

Abstract

Leptomeningeal metastasis is a fatal manifestation seen in advanced cancer patients. Its incidence is increasing, reaching 3.8% in molecularly unselected non-small cell lung cancer patients and up to 5% and 9% in ALK-rearranged and EGFR-mutant lung cancer patients, respectively. The prognosis remains poor despite systemic treatment, intrathecal chemotherapy, radiation therapy and personalized treatments in molecularly selected patients. However, new therapies with improved cerebral-spinal fluid penetration have been developed for subgroups of molecular selected patients indicating they could be promising therapeutic options for managing leptomeningeal disease. Systemic chemotherapy, which may be combined with intrathecal chemotherapy, remains standard treatment for lung cancer patients with leptomeningeal disease and a good-risk profile. We summarize evidence reported in the literature for managing this complication in lung cancer patients. Based on this, we have selected potential therapeutic strategies that could be used in daily clinical practice.

Introduction

Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are the multifocal seeding of the leptomeninges by malignant carcinomatous cells [1]. Malignant cells can reach the meninges by several different pathways: haematogenous spread via arterial or venous circulation, perivascular lymphatic spread, endoneural and perineural spread, direct spread from metastases located in the brain or bone in proximity to the subarachnoid or ventricular spaces, and spread from choroid plexus and subependymal metastases. Two types of leptomeningeal tumor spread can be distinguished: the first with free-floating non-adherent cancer cells (diffuse type); and the second characterized by contrast-enhanced leptomeningeal nodules (nodular type). LM are found in approximately 5% of patients with malignant tumours [1], and most arise from lung, breast carcinoma and melanoma [2]. In autopsy series, LM incidence may be 20% or more for many solid tumours [3], suggesting that they are clinically underdiagnosed and likely occur at a late stage of the disease. Clinical features vary according to the CNS region involved. Classically, three domains of neurological functions are used to characterize the clinical features: the cerebral hemisphere, cranial nerve, and spinal cord and exiting nerve roots [4].

LM are becoming increasingly common due to availability of improved treatments, leading ultimately to prolonged patient survival, and as neuroimaging methods improve. However, prognosis of LM remain poor, with patient performance status (PS) being the main prognostic factor [2]. Up to one-third of patients are treated with best supportive care alone [5]. Despite the lack of standard treatment, active treatment has been associated independently with longer overall survival (OS) [5] .

Among non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, the incidence of LM is 3.8%, being more frequent in adenocarcinoma subtype. One-third of patients have concomitant brain metastases [6]. Median OS of NSCLC patients with LM ranges from 3.6 to 11 months [6], [7], mostly as a consequence of using modern systemic therapies, which decrease the risk of death (hazard ratio [HR], 0.24; P = 0.007) [8]. In the modern treatment era, LM is a devastating complication for oncologic patients, including molecularly selected patients, and the optimal therapeutic approach remains a challenge. This review explores the present cutting edge options for diagnosis, systemic treatment and immunotherapy for LM among NSCLC patients, examining the efficacy of personalized treatments in molecularly-selected lung cancer patients with LM. Based on our literature review we have selected some therapeutic recommendations, which could be used in daily clinical practice (Table 1).

Section snippets

Diagnostic

Diagnosis of LM is based on three assessments types: clinical, imaging and cerebral-spinal fluid (CSF) cytological examinations. Initial clinical manifestations can be subtle and may include cauda equine symptoms or signs, cranial nerve deficits, headaches and back pain, visual disturbances, diplopia, hearing loss and neurocognitive syndromes. In advanced stages, symptoms related to elevated intracranial pressure could occur [9], [10]. In current trials, it is based on the identification of

Treatment

Treatment objectives for LM are to improve neurologic symptoms, quality of life, and survival, while maintaining marginal toxicity. Standard treatment is yet to be established due to the lack of randomized clinical trials with definitive conclusions. This situation is explained by low incidence rates, the rapidly progressing nature of the disease, and the heterogeneous LM population. As such, most treatment recommendations are based on clinical experience or patient cohorts and experts’

Molecularly-selected lung cancer patients

Approximately 20–25% of advanced NSCLC tumours, especially the adenocarcinoma subtype, have an actionable oncogenic driver mutations [36] allowing personalized treatment. In Caucasian patients, the most frequent genetic alterations in advanced NSCLC are the KRAS mutation in ∼29% of patients, the EGFR mutations in ∼11%, ALK rearrangements in ∼5% [37], and MET mutations (exon 14) in 4% [38]. Other less frequent mutations include BRAF and PIK3CA mutations in ∼2%, each, HER2 mutations in 1% of

Immunotherapy

Four randomized phase III, two with nivolumab [110], [111], one trial with pembrolizumab [112] (both anti-PD-1 agents); and one trial with atezolizumab [113] reported that immunotherapy significantly improved survival compared to docetaxel in previously-treated patients advanced NSCLC patients, even among the subpopulation of patients with pre-treated brain metastases. The efficacy of immunotherapy among patients with symptomatic or untreated brain metastases is unknown. In a recent phase II

Conclusions

LM is an increasing complication among cancer patients. Incidence of LM is 3.8% in the overall NSCLC population, and can increase to 9% in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients. Prognosis remains poor, even with the use of personalized treatments, principally due to low penetration into the CSF of currently used TKI and cytotoxic agents. However, third generation EGFR and ALK TKIs have been developed with better brain-barrier penetration, which may have an impact as therapeutic strategies among

Conflicts of interests

The authors declare don’t have any conflict of interest.

References (116)

  • P.G. Morris et al.

    Leptomeningeal metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer: survival and the impact of whole brain radiotherapy

    J Thorac Oncol

    (2012)
  • J.H. Park et al.

    Clinical outcomes of leptomeningeal metastasis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer in the modern chemotherapy era

    Lung Cancer

    (2012)
  • F. Barlesi et al.

    Pemetrexed and cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with asymptomatic inoperable brain metastases: a multicenter phase II trial (GFPC 07–01)

    Ann Oncol

    (2011)
  • F. Barlesi et al.

    Biomarkers France contributors, Routine molecular profiling of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a 1-year nationwide programme of the French Cooperative Thoracic Intergroup (IFCT)

    Lancet

    (2016)
  • Y.-S. Li et al.

    Leptomeningeal metastases in patients with NSCLC with EGFR mutations

    J Thorac Oncol

    (2016)
  • J.L. Kuiper et al.

    Treatment and survival of patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer and leptomeningeal metastasis: a retrospective cohort analysis

    Lung Cancer

    (2015)
  • J. Zhao et al.

    Cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of gefitinib in patients with lung adenocarcinoma

    Clin Lung Cancer

    (2013)
  • E. Lee et al.

    Erlotinib versus gefitinib for control of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in non-small-cell lung cancer

    J Thorac Oncol

    (2013)
  • M. Schuler et al.

    First-line afatinib versus chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and common epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations and brain metastases

    J Thorac Oncol

    (2016)
  • P. Hoffknecht et al.

    Afatinib Compassionate Use Consortium (ACUC), efficacy of the irreversible ErbB family blocker afatinib in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-pretreated non-small-cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases or leptomeningeal disease

    J Thorac Oncol

    (2015)
  • A. Hata et al.

    Spatiotemporal T790M Heterogeneity in Individual Patients with EGFR-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer after Acquired Resistance to EGFR-TKI

    J Thorac Oncol

    (2015)
  • T. Seto et al.

    Erlotinib alone or with bevacizumab as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring EGFR mutations (JO25567): an open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 2 study

    Lancet Oncol

    (2014)
  • E. Ichihara et al.

    Phase II trial of gefitinib in combination with bevacizumab as first-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with activating EGFR gene mutations: the Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group Trial 1001

    J Thorac Oncol

    (2015)
  • J.F. Gainor et al.

    The central nervous system as a sanctuary site in ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer

    J Thorac Oncol

    (2013)
  • H.K. Ahn et al.

    ALK inhibitor crizotinib combined with intrathecal methotrexate treatment for non-small cell lung cancer with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis

    Lung Cancer

    (2012)
  • D.-W. Kim et al.

    Activity and safety of ceritinib in patients with ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (ASCEND-1): updated results from the multicentre, open-label, phase 1 trial

    Lancet Oncol

    (2016)
  • S.M. Gadgeel et al.

    Safety and activity of alectinib against systemic disease and brain metastases in patients with crizotinib-resistant ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (AF-002JG): results from the dose-finding portion of a phase 1/2 study

    Lancet Oncol

    (2014)
  • J.F. Gainor et al.

    Alectinib salvages CNS relapses in ALK-positive lung cancer patients previously treated with crizotinib and ceritinib

    J Thorac Oncol

    (2015)
  • H.Y. Zou et al.

    PF-06463922, an ALK/ROS1 inhibitor, overcomes resistance to first and second generation ALK inhibitors in preclinical models

    Cancer Cell

    (2015)
  • J. Mazières et al.

    Lung cancer patients with HER2 mutations treated with chemotherapy and HER2-targeted drugs: results from the European EUHER2 cohort

    Ann Oncol

    (2016)
  • J.L. Clarke et al.

    Leptomeningeal metastases in the MRI era

    Neurology

    (2010)
  • E. Le Rhun et al.

    Carcinomatous meningitis: Leptomeningeal metastases in solid tumors

    Surg Neurol Int

    (2013)
  • M. Chamberlain et al.

    Leptomeningeal metastasis: a response assessment in neuro-oncology critical review of endpoints and response criteria of published randomized clinical trials

    Neuro-Oncology

    (2014)
  • M.C. Chamberlain

    Leptomeningeal metastasis

    Curr Opin Oncol

    (2010)
  • S.K. Singh et al.

    Intracranial leptomeningeal metastases: comparison of depiction at FLAIR and contrast-enhanced MR imaging

    Radiology

    (2000)
  • Central Nervous System Cancers. NCCN version 1.2016 (www.nccn.org),...
  • C. Ma et al.

    Novel method for the detection and quantification of malignant cells in the CSF of patients with leptomeningeal metastasis of lung cancer

    Oncol Lett

    (2016)
  • L. Nayak et al.

    Rare cell capture technology for the diagnosis of leptomeningeal metastasis in solid tumors

    Neurology

    (2013)
  • R.N. Hitchins et al.

    A prospective randomized trial of single-agent versus combination chemotherapy in meningeal carcinomatosis

    J Clin Oncol

    (1987)
  • S.A. Grossman et al.

    Randomized prospective comparison of intraventricular methotrexate and thiotepa in patients with previously untreated neoplastic meningitis. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

    J Clin Oncol

    (1993)
  • M.J. Glantz et al.

    Randomized trial of a slow-release versus a standard formulation of cytarabine for the intrathecal treatment of lymphomatous meningitis

    J Clin Oncol

    (1999)
  • M.J. Glantz et al.

    A randomized controlled trial comparing intrathecal sustained-release cytarabine (DepoCyt) to intrathecal methotrexate in patients with neoplastic meningitis from solid tumors

    Clin Cancer Res

    (1999)
  • M.J. Glantz et al.

    Route of intracerebrospinal fluid chemotherapy administration and efficacy of therapy in neoplastic meningitis

    Cancer

    (2010)
  • Y.-L. Wu et al.

    Intrathecal chemotherapy as a treatment for leptomeningeal metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis

    Oncol Lett

    (2016)
  • M. Li et al.

    Pemetrexed plus platinum as the first-line treatment option for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

    PLoS ONE

    (2012)
  • S.L. Stapleton et al.

    Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed after intravenous administration in non-human primates

    Cancer Chemother Pharmacol

    (2007)
  • U. Herrlinger et al.

    Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in leptomeningeal metastasis: diagnostic and prognostic value

    Br J Cancer

    (2004)
  • M.D. Groves et al.

    Biomarkers of disease: cerebrospinal fluid vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and stromal cell derived factor (SDF)-1 levels in patients with neoplastic meningitis (NM) due to breast cancer, lung cancer and melanoma

    J Neurooncol

    (2009)
  • A. Ilhan-Mutlu et al.

    Bevacizumab prevents brain metastases formation in lung adenocarcinoma

    Mol Cancer Ther

    (2016)
  • P.-F. Wu et al.

    A pilot study of bevacizumab combined with etoposide and cisplatin in breast cancer patients with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis

    BMC Cancer

    (2015)
  • Cited by (145)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France. Fax: +33 (0)1 42 11 52 19.

    2

    Neuro-oncology, Neurosurgery Department, Salengro Hospital, Rue Emile Laine, 59037 Lille cedex, France. Fax: +33 (0)3 20 44 68 08.

    View full text