Journal Information
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Full text access
Pre-proof, online 12 July 2024
Changes in the functional classification of spirometry using the new interpretation standard 2022: a multicenter study
Visits
36
C Arce Santiago1,
Corresponding author
arcesantiago@fibertel.com.ar

Correspondence author: Combatientes de Malvinas 3150 (1427), Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
, Carlos Aguirre-Franco2, Patricia Schonffeldt-Guerrero3, Cecilia Rodríguez-Flores4, Laura Gochicoa-Rangel5
1 Instituto de Investigaciones Médicas A. Lanari, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
2 Laboratorio de pruebas de función pulmonar. Fundación Neumológica Colombiana, Bogotá, Colombia
3 Laboratorio de función pulmonar Instituto Nacional del Tórax, Santiago de Chile, Chile
4 Laboratorio de función pulmonar. Hospital Maciel. Facultad de Medicina, Montevideo, Uruguay
5 Departamento de Fisiología Respiratoria. Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias "Ismael Cosío Villegas", Ciudad de México, México
This item has received
Article information
Abstract

Introduction: Pulmonary function tests are vital for diagnosing lung diseases, assessing treatment responses, and monitoring respiratory health. Recent updates to interpretive standards by the European Respiratory and American Thoracic Societies (ERS/ATS) in 2022 introduced significant changes compared to the 2005 standards. They include incorporating lung volume measurements, non-specific and mixed disorders, introducing z-scores for functional abnormality assessment, reducing severity categories from five to three, and revising criteria for positive bronchodilator responses.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective, multi-center study across four centers using spirometric data spanning from 2002 to 2022. We categorized spirometry results using both the 2005 and 2022 ATS/ERS standards and calculated predicted values following the GLI 2012 equation (Caucasian subset).

Results: Among 79,039 subjects, we observed that 23% shifted from an obstructive diagnosis under the 2005 standard to a mixed pattern diagnosis under the 2022 standard, necessitating lung volume assessments. In the evaluation of bronchodilator responses among 59,203 tests, 12.3% of those initially classified as responders were reclassified as non-responders with the new standards. We found variations in severity categorization across age groups, with older patients tending to receive milder severity classifications and younger individuals receiving greater severity classifications under the 2022 standards.

Conclusions: The 2022 document emphasizes early lung volume assessment, potentially leading to increased utilization of more complex tests. Furthermore, the bronchodilator response was predominant in extreme age groups and among individuals with milder spirometric impairments. This shift may impact treatment decisions, potentially initiating medication in milder cases and de-escalating treatment in more severe cases.

Keywords:
spirometry
interpretation
pulmonary function tests
bronchodilation
Full text is only aviable in PDF
Archivos de Bronconeumología
Article options
Tools

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?