Journal Information
Vol. 14. Issue 1.
Pages 46-49 (January - March 1978)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 14. Issue 1.
Pages 46-49 (January - March 1978)
Full text access
Comparacion de la accion broncodilatadora de la terbutalina administrada por via oral y en aerosol
Comparison of the bronchodilator action of terbutaline administered by oral route and in aerosol
Visits
4551
M. Corrales*, A. de Vega*, F. Payo*, L. Palenciano**
* Médico Adjunto. Instituto Nacional de Silicosis. Oviedo
** Jefe de Servicio, Fisiología Respiratoria. Instituto Nacional de Silicosis. Oviedo
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Resumen

Se ha comparado el efecto de la Terbutalina por vía oral (5 mgr.) y por aerosol (0,5 mgr.) sobre la Raw, SRaw y VGI en 14 pacientes con obstrucción de vías aéreas. La broncodilatación fue ligeramente mayor y se produjo más rápidamente tras aerosol que las tabletas pero por las diferencias no llegaban a ser estadísti-camente significativas.

A igualdad de broncodilatación la Terbutalina produce menos efectos colaterales por aerosol que por vía oral. Se aconseja, por tanto, emplear la vía oral sólo cuando la administra-ción en aerosol sea insatisfactoria por algún motivo.

Summary

The authors have compared the effect of Terbutaline by oral route (5 mgr.) and by aerosol (0.5 mgr.) on the Raw, SRaw and VGI in 14 patients with obstruction of the air routes. The bronchodilatation was slightly superior and was produced more rapidly after the aerosol than after the tablets, but the differences were not statistically significant.

The bronchodilatation being equal, Terbutaline by aerosol produced fewer side effects than by the oral route. Therefore, the authors advise use by oral route only when administration by aerosol is unsatisfactory for some reason.

Full text is only aviable in PDF
Bibliografia
[1.]
Problems with Terbutaline.
New. Engl. J. Med., 296 (1977), pp. 821
[2.]
H. Formgren.
Broncho-and Cardio-selective β-receptor active drugs in the treatment of asthmatic patients.
Scand. J. Resp. Dis.,, (1977), pp. 25
[3.]
G. Thiringer, N. Svedmyr.
Comparison of infused and inhaled Terbutaline in patients with asthma.
Scand. J. Resp. Dis., 57 (1976), pp. 17
[4.]
M. Corrales, A. De Vega, F. Payo, L. Palenciano.
Espirometría y pietismografia corporal en la valoración de broncodilatadores.
Arch. Bronconeumol., 12 (1976), pp. 193
[5.]
W.T. Ulmer.
Analysis of changes in airways resistance during quiet breathing in obstructive lung disease.
Bronchitis III, pp. 235
[6.]
P. Gayrard, J. Orehek, J. Charpin.
Stimulation et blocage β-adrenergique dans l’asthme.
Respiration, 32 (1975), pp. 294
[7.]
H. Formgren.
The therapeutic value of oral long-term treatment with Terbutaline (Bricanyl) in asthma.
Scand. J. Resp. Dis., 56 (1975), pp. 321
[8.]
G. Thiringer, N. Svedmyr.
Evaluation of skeletal muscle tremor due to bronchodilator agents.
Scand. J. Resp. Dis., 56 (1975), pp. 93
[9.]
T. Svedmyr, S. Larsson, G. Thiringer.
Development of «resistance» in β-adrenergic receptors of asthmatic paüents.
Chest, 69 (1976), pp. 479
[10.]
I.C. Patterson, G.K. Crompton.
Use of pressurised aerosol by asthmatic patients.
Brit. Med. J., (1976), pp. 76
[11.]
J. Orehek, P. Gayrard, M.A.U.D. Gri-, Ch.J. Charpin.
Patient error in use of bronchodilator metered aerosols.
Brit. Med. J., 1 (1976), pp. 76
[12.]
A.K. Pierce, J.P. Sandford.
Bacterial contamination of aerosols.
Arch. Intern. Med., 131 (1973), pp. 156
Copyright © 1978. Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica
Archivos de Bronconeumología
Article options
Tools

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?